|
Quote: Do you know if this is true? I have used it extensively over the past few weeks and it never ran out of memory - not once!
With VS2012 it happened almost every day.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: With VS2012 it happened almost every day.
Heck, we have some huge forms at work and VS '15 runs out of memory just about every 30 mins!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I would be interested to hear your impressions of VS2017.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I often run out of memory. It happens almost every day!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
So you missed reading the reports where ms says it's unhappy because so many developers are bypassing their personal-information-gathering spyware saintly telemetry functions?
Not much point in stopping them spying on you helping you with their saintly telemetry functions if you're just going to allow them direct access to you.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Got any links for this? I'd like to read more.
I know there was some brouhaha over them doing this for C++ code (which they supposedly removed in Update 3), but I hadn't heard any more after that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure it was in an article in the Insider News (since that's just about the only place where I read tech news).
It was going on about how developers and the tech elite were putting themselves more at risk because they knew how to get around winio's forced updates.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, ok - that's different than what I was thinking about. The issue I had in mind was something that happened in May/June of last year where the VS C++ compiler was injecting Microsoft telemetry calls into your compiled binaries.
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose this version does a better job of hiding the telemetrics code that it stealthly inserts into your exe.
|
|
|
|
|
It is far from ready for final release, and they plan for that on 7 March. I was having a beautiful time writing a WPF app with a .NET Core web API as data source, but then I had to "quickly" do an MVC web app with a web api data source. 2017 is nowhere ready enough for debugging web apps. I have to start the app with dotnet run , then start the remote debugger (added an External Tool to do that), even if the site isn't remote, then attach to the dotnet process. I used to just press F5.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Experts
Usually I finish my mails with:
Kind regards
XYZ
Now my "not programming" question:
Is it correct or appropriate I mean this "kind regards" or is it too personal for a business correspondence?
Thank you very much in advance for your help.
Kind regards
Bruno
Regards
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
A formal business letter is normally ended with "yours sincerely", "your faithfully" or "yours truly" depending on the context. Emails tend to be ended with "regards", "kind regards", "thanks and regards" or any other appropriate greeting, again depending on the context.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your Explanation.
The very formal I do like you mention with
Yours sincerely
FirstName Name
So what I'm thinking to understand from your answer "Kind regards" is ok for non formal?
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again and a 5 and accepted
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
For informal, friends and strangers, I just end with
Cheers[1]
Brady
[1]It's not a toast, but a standard parting "greeting" in UK based versions of English, especially ubiquitous in South Africa.
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: ubiquitous in South Africa Not something I have ever heard from my Afrikaaner daughter-in-law. However, now she has been granted British Citizenship we will need to teach her how to speak English properly:
i.e. mispronounced, ungrammatical and full of slang.
|
|
|
|
|
No, not in common use among Afrikaaners, except for an occasional, malformed 'tchee-errs'.
Teach her well, all you say you will, please.
|
|
|
|
|
For formal letters, the general rule is that you use "Yours sincerely" (or "Sincerely yours" in the USA) when you've addressed the letter by name, and "Your faithfully" when you've used a non-specific address - "Dear Sirs", "Dear Sir/Madam", etc.
word choice - Is it "Yours faithfully" or "Yours sincerely"? - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange[^]
But most email messages don't require this level of formality.
Just try to avoid signing emails to your customers with "love from" or "XOXO".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for this.
"Your faithfully" sounds very strange for me after consulting http://dict.leo.org/englisch-deutsch/Your%20faithfully but I trust you that it is ok.
[Edit]
I'am a late bloomer, I know it . "xoxo" I need to test it near to coco (compiler compiler)
[/Edit]
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As Richard said.
Faithfully & sincerely are formal but the meaning and usage is clear. If an e-mail is written as a letter, I always start Dear X/Sir/Madam/Alien Overlord and add the corresponding salutation. When it is an informal note, I would sign off 'Thanks', 'Looking forward to your ideas/whatver'.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Alien Overlord
Thank you for clarification.
Yours faithfully (facefully? )
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds OK to me.
Maybe I should use that instead of "stuff it".
Rules for playing Javascript frameworks.
1. You can't win.
2. You can't break even.
3. You can't get out of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that, was being smarta$$, don't use it.
Rules for playing Javascript frameworks.
1. You can't win.
2. You can't break even.
3. You can't get out of the game.
|
|
|
|