|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Now if it can arrange to spike the IP address!
That'd be the fun part -- as long as you can unspike them again, when you realise that half your phone doesn't work, any more.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
com.google.uid.shared.10015 DIE you data pig you. BBllurt!!!!
oops - anyone want to buy a brick, nice slim brick going cheap hah hah.
Yah I could see that happening and I could see me doing it to some obscure service I didn't like the look of. I won't even root my phone because the temptation to remove some of the vast number of apps that seem to infest the bloody thing would probably brick it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I root them when I need to get at stuff, then unroot them again.
The tools nowadays make it soooo easy.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've got TCPView, NetStat, WireShark, and all the other usual suspects, but they're all numbers, buttons, and figury-outery things. I was hoping for the same kind of simple, graphical view, where you can instantly see how many connections there are to the Kremlin.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I see what you want now. I don't know of any existing software, but it shouldn't be too hard to write something 
|
|
|
|
|
Outside my field of expertise, but if you make one, I'll pay EUR10* 
* As, I imagine, would many, many others
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So, the funny thing about the android app is that for it to work, it needs to pass all the information that's being packet capped on your network to a third party for parsing to "make it pretty". That's not terribly secure, especially if said app was written by, say, the Kremlin (or NSA, whoever). Then they don't need to even snoop on your traffic, you're sending it all right to them voluntarily!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley, but they're not the Russian government or an American corporation; they're a couple of guys in Germany, which makes them a tad (read: a Lot) more trustworthy.
Of course, when microsoft buys them out, that trust will be lost -- but the app will stop being useful, anyway, so it's an auto-resolving problem.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Walking back to the flat today I spotted five people in suits/smart casual having 'rows' or talking animatedly to what I hope were ear pieces / blu tooth microphones hidden about there garb. At least with larger ear pieces / wires you could tell the person was not an escapee!
Ho-Hum! 
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps they were talking to @Mike-Hankey 's psychiatrist?
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
I plan on setting up shop soon! Am conferring with an expert first.
Someone's therapist knows all about you!
modified 27-Mar-17 15:20pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh have to go looking for that thread my Lounge attendance has been slipping lately!
|
|
|
|
|
Midi_Mick wrote: @Mike-Hankey's psychiatrist
I thought he'd hanged himself, out of despair.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So now it's ok to be a looney as long as you are wearing a visible headset. 
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
It woud appear so! 
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonInThePubAGAIN wrote: I spotted five people in suits/smart casual having 'rows' or talking animatedly
Since when did a group of 5 people talking be considered "talking to yourself?" 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
5 Individuals, separate locations...
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Since when did a group of 5 people talking be considered "talking to yourself?"
They're called "meetings".
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I/we can hope 
|
|
|
|
|
My favourite example of this was when I was walking down a street in Shanghai at about 2300hrs with the missus.
About 150 yards in front of us was a young girl, wearing a nurse's uniform (just come off shift, or something). We couldn't hear anything she was saying, but her gesticulations (we were watching from behind, remember) were absolutely hilarious.
She was obviously having a "discussion" with her boyfriend, and we could feel what she was saying, even if we didn't know the details -- arms snapping out, fingers waving, etc; but no-one else there!
We followed her down a road we didn't want to go down, simply because it was so entertaining.
Poor thing. We've all been through such "discussions", so it strikes a chord, when we see someone else suffering one.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh good, I was under the impression that it was something to do with myself (maybe I'm not a wierdo magnet!)
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: We followed her down a road we didn't want to go down, simply because it was so entertaining.
How long did it take before you realised she was talking to the police to report a couple of weirdos stalking her?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard, could you please clarify why you marked and closed my question as spam or similar, would it not be more helpful to clarify what you think is wrong or incomplete with it. thank you!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
