|
JustWatchLittle wrote: still on c++ Be happy... it could be VB
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually... I don't have a problem with it, but it was a mandatory joke :P
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
VB certainly earned me a lot of money when I was contracting.
|
|
|
|
|
Only because something is profitable doesn't imply that is good
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes true, and thanks for blaming me. I find all this also, but _what exactly _ Excel is using?
And in case you think you know everything, than please explain which algo I have to use that my original Points are in the smooth function....
Google I can do by myself, but get the real Background is sometimes more than just a Little bit googling and copy&paste...
modified 11-Nov-17 15:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
JustWatchLittle wrote: thanks for blaming me Nobody "blamed" you ! If anyone is to blame here, it should be this lazy flea, who didn't go a-googlin' before he oped his yap JustWatchLittle wrote: And in case you think you know everything, than please explain which algo I have to use that my original Points are in the smooth function.... So, we should read your mind, figure out what type of spline function you want ?
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it.» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
You should reread and rethink this post.
It comes off in a pretty bad way, Marc is really trying to be helpful, and there's not enough info in the thread to conclude that he is "blaming" you.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm aware that Mr. Marc Clifton is an authority and that his information/tips are very helpful! I read most of his articles and enjoy them and are thankful for them.
For this question I simply feeled pissed off, could be I'm wrong. Sorry. Sorry especally to @Marc-Clifton
|
|
|
|
|
JustWatchLittle wrote: Yes true, and thanks for blaming me.
I'm LMAO reading the replies. My reply to Bill was specifically meant for Bill as he was wishing there were some C# implementations. I was actually surprised how little how I found googling around.
JustWatchLittle wrote: Google I can do by myself, but get the real Background is sometimes more than just a Little bit googling and copy&paste...
Well duh, I wasn't googling for what algo Excel was specifically using, just trying to find if someone, say on github, had done a broad implementation of several algorithms. Never came up with anything, though I imagine in Python/Numpy they exist.
JustWatchLittle wrote: And in case you think you know everything, than please explain which algo I have to use that my original Points are in the smooth function....
Everything but that.
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, thank you very much for your answer. Need some time to translate and understand it.
Thanks again.
Bruno
|
|
|
|
|
As ever, thanks !
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it.\» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
God it is dreadful.
On XP it used to work, now, it is a pile of crap.
|
|
|
|
|
Tell us WHY it's dreadful and a pile of crap. Everything else is just an opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
because it steams and is brown
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like coffee. Mmmm... coffee...
|
|
|
|
|
And fresh made chocolate brownies.
|
|
|
|
|
And Halle Berry...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mileage may vary...I've really not had any problems with Windows networking, aside from VMs which can be a pain.
So, what's the problem?
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be caching a lot of stuff because when you change something it takes minutes to get a connection.
You get endless progress bar, across the address field in explorer, followed b the useless 'diagnose' choice.
even after flushing the DNS cache, because my two test machines have the same ip address (makes testing easier when I switch between them), windows thinks it knows about the connection but can't access it (probably because the option 'let windows manage' got enabled.
Then you have the ridiculous inability to switch a network from private, to public, or work. In fact how the hell does an IP link even HAVE these sub types? It doesnt. This is windows trying to be clever and limit access. And when software tries to be clever it goes wrong. And it is painfully slow to find a machine on the network. You should try linux. It really is immediate.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: because my two test machines have the same ip address
That's probably the problem - Windows is trying to ensure that the machine at the other end is exactly the one it thinks it is.
I have no problems with it, and I've got 2 Win10 devices, 1 Win XP desktop, 5 Android (or 7 if I count the Amazon and Google TV devices - and I probably should), two linux based NASes and a gawd-knows-what based printer on my network. Plus the router. All the shares work fine, all access to SQL is fine, it just works.
Maybe that's because I don't play silly buggers with my IP addresses?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That is just todays problem, and it wouldnt be if it didnt frigging cache it somewhere). My main grips is the time it takes, and frequent failure, to even access devices on the network. Hell, it does this even trying to open a local folder sometimes. You must have seen the blue progress bar in explorer surely?
|
|
|
|