|
I wish I had. This new role sounds really interesting and has got me really confused. One minute I think I've made a decision, then the next I've changed my mind. Both roles involve challenges, interesting work and a good managers.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Here's some generic, semi-deep nonsense wisdom that may pull you over the line.
"Never regret the things you didn't do" 
|
|
|
|
|
I like that 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
1. Pay : Almost Same
2. Commute : Almost same
3. Autonomy : Almost same
So it narrows down to 2 things. Are you ready to move from your comfort zone and start a new Job with various unknown factors which you cannot predict now?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
1) What can you foresee about your career in the current company? Do you think it's probable that you will rise in position or do you foresee a stable career in the same position? And in the other company?
An engaging career is often more important than other things, static places become narrow quite easily. A new position in a company usually gives more chances to gain a prominent role.
2) What can you know about the new company in terms of annual revenue, accumulated debt, size and year of foundation?
Going from a place that will stand up for long to one that in a couple of years risks bankruptcy ain't good.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
If you're happy where you are, and pay and commute are the same. Why do you want to change?
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't really looking to change. I got approached by an agency with the role, and it seemed interesting. I get approached all the time from agencies, and 99% of the roles don't interest me. But this one was local, matched my skills set, was paying well etc. So I agreed to an interview, which went better than I was expecting. So I have a good offer in front of me, as well as being happy in my current role. Hence the confusion.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
So it's basically down to whether you want the security of a safe and still good job.
Or if you'd like a new challenge.
Only you can answer that.
But if you believe you will get bored some time in the future, you better go for it. Otherwise you shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
How close to retirement are you? It sounds like you can stay where you are till then (I know I did that and stayed in the same position for 15 years after 20 years of being a consultant/contractor).
It really comes down to comfort and do you want to accept the challenge of starting all over again with a different company.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm more than prepared to move if I thought it was the right thing to do. Pushing my limits and setting myself challenges has defined my entire career. I even moved my family early on in my career to be nearer to a role.
Normally I would have instinctively have made up my mind by now either way. This time the decision seems more difficult as the pros and cons are so evenly matched.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I currently have a GeForce GTX 460 graphics card which did its job nicely, but is getting outdated. I was looking to upgrade it, but there are so many options I have no idea what to look for.
I'm looking for a middle range type of thing, OK for playing today's games, some video processing, ... but it doesn't need to do hard labor.
I was looking into the GTX 1050 or GTX 1060 range of cards, but even there you have multiple versions ranging from 150 - 400 EUR (memory is pretty clear, but the other parameters that valid the price difference are not)
My main concern is:
a) it should fit in the same slot as my GTX 460 (I think that also uses 2 slots?)
b) my power bank should be able to handle it
any recommendations from the experts?
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently using a DUAL-GTX1060-6GB OC edition.
Bought it from amazon in November 2018 for $250.
Some times you get good offers like that. Keep an eye out, it is the Christmas season and these things go on sale.
|
|
|
|
|
don't forget to consider the box around the GPU, make sure it will work on modern hardware - the most popular slot of the day (of course also runs on your current box)
consider even the system, even if you are hard core windows-only now don't write off others [at least linux] so fast, you never know what your base o/s will be a year or two from now - maybe due to app/game choices, work-at-home, even o/s policy changes from ms (and others just as much).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming your budget goes that high I'll second the recommendation for a $230ish (US prices) 1660 super (roughly the same price as a standard 1660 but ~10% faster), or 1660 Ti ($280 but only 10% faster than 1660S).
The high priced 1060's are quasi-scammers massively marking stuff up because it's out of stock hoping to find a sucker who doesn't know any better. For the most part I'd recommend avoiding them at 1660S is ~35% faster than a 1060-6gb; and they generally start at about the same price.
The 1060-3gb is maybe an option if you can find a cheaper one around $180, but with only 3gb of ram is going to limit your ability to actually use the rest of the cards performance; and low ram cards tend to age much more poorly with time.
The 1050 and 1050Ti can both be found around $150, performance on both is about the same but the TI's got 4gb instead of 3; and is the one I'd recommend on a budget.
The 460 was a 150W card, which is more than any of the above so you shouldn't need to worry about if your PSU can run them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to ask what game needs something significantly better than a GTX 460, which I thought sounded similar to what I have, but after looking it up, it turns out my 960 was out in 2014, whereas the 460 is 4 years older still. Pretty good run, for a video card.
FWIW, the only thing I still play nowadays is GTAV, which is almost constantly smooth as glass even at 4K. Not bad for a 5-year old card, although to be fair, the game predates the card, so by today's standards GTAV can't be all that demanding...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing some of the most challenging code I've written in months. It's for doing type and member resolution using the CodeDOM. It has to virtualize types from the code dom tree and allow you to crawl their members which is not easy, especially since it has to be able to traverse reflected types as well. Yikes.
That and scope is always a pain. Where am I? What members, variables, arguments, namespace imports etc, are available from here? that kind of thing.
Mostly I've solved it but crawling members is tough. I'm scratching my head a lot.
Still, it's great fun, too. I love that my parser is working so far, and how well the project has gone considering the challenges.
So one milestone down, currently working on the next.
After that, I think it gets easier, as I just have to emulate T4 text processing as the Slang preprocessor.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: crawling members is tough
Have you tried breaststroke instead?
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager: "And our good-job-medal this month goes to... Joe! Congratulations Joe, for a job well done!"
Medal: "Good Job You Have No Poo On Your Hands!"
Colleague sewer workers with poo on their hands because they actually did their job: 
|
|
|
|
|
Completely to the point, that's why you are rewarded with the Leader Medal[^] 
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: crawling members is tough
Those can be stomped easily. It is the ones who can still run are problem.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
If it were possible to injure myself writing code I'd have sprained something by now
It is possible to injure yourself writing code.
I've spent decades sitting in a chair and hardly moving all day. This has resulted in weight gain and, in turn, a bad back.
I can't imagine I'd be in this shape (round's a shape, right?) if I instead had been a lumberjack (leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia, etc etc).
|
|
|
|
|
I stand at my keyboard in penance whilst debugging.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Research into standing desks is suggesting they're far from being as great as previously thought. I don't have any problem believing that.
That being said, it's obvious getting up and stretching after a while is a must, so I wouldn't mind having a standing desk...but the amount of stuff in my case that would have to follow to make it practical in either position makes it rather...unworkable (for one thing, I have too many cables that are just too short).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
