Click here to Skip to main content
15,910,471 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
JokeRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Nelek19-May-24 10:19
protectorNelek19-May-24 10:19 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Mike Hankey19-May-24 10:41
mveMike Hankey19-May-24 10:41 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
trønderen19-May-24 11:58
trønderen19-May-24 11:58 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Richard Andrew x6419-May-24 12:13
professionalRichard Andrew x6419-May-24 12:13 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
trønderen19-May-24 12:11
trønderen19-May-24 12:11 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Ralf Quint20-May-24 10:14
Ralf Quint20-May-24 10:14 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
trønderen20-May-24 14:44
trønderen20-May-24 14:44 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Ralf Quint20-May-24 16:48
Ralf Quint20-May-24 16:48 
Very interesting that you are trying to explain how Pascal works to someone who is programming in various versions of Pascal, as the main programming language, for 48 years now.

Yes, the "with A, B" is (for decades, nothing new) just a shorter form of writing a nested "with A..with B". That alone is not a problem, never is, never was.
The problem that I was pointing out, and you apparently didn't understand, is that within the nested WITH statements (regardless of how you write it), it IS POSSIBLE to create an unintentional ambiguity, which is NOT guaranteed to be always have the same precedence. If you think that, it clearly shows that you have not worked with a lot of different Pascal implementations.

And the application of scopes within nested procedures/functions, that is completely different issue. THAT is clearly defined. But that would be also not related to the initial post of this thread.
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
trønderen21-May-24 4:12
trønderen21-May-24 4:12 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Ralf Quint21-May-24 6:18
Ralf Quint21-May-24 6:18 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
trønderen21-May-24 6:51
trønderen21-May-24 6:51 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Peter Turtle19-May-24 21:47
professionalPeter Turtle19-May-24 21:47 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
0x01AA20-May-24 0:25
mve0x01AA20-May-24 0:25 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Peter Turtle20-May-24 2:25
professionalPeter Turtle20-May-24 2:25 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Al Gonzalez20-May-24 6:46
Al Gonzalez20-May-24 6:46 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
0x01AA20-May-24 7:06
mve0x01AA20-May-24 7:06 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Ralf Quint20-May-24 8:41
Ralf Quint20-May-24 8:41 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
Ravi Bhavnani20-May-24 14:53
professionalRavi Bhavnani20-May-24 14:53 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
0x01AA21-May-24 8:26
mve0x01AA21-May-24 8:26 
GeneralRe: Fluent Api in Pascal, nothing earth-shattering ... Pin
jschell21-May-24 12:44
jschell21-May-24 12:44 
GeneralWordle 1,065 Pin
StarNamer@work18-May-24 13:32
professionalStarNamer@work18-May-24 13:32 
GeneralRe: Wordle 1,065 Pin
Sandeep Mewara18-May-24 17:09
mveSandeep Mewara18-May-24 17:09 
GeneralRe: Wordle 1,065 Pin
OriginalGriff18-May-24 20:01
mveOriginalGriff18-May-24 20:01 
GeneralRe: Wordle 1,065 Pin
Amarnath S18-May-24 20:10
professionalAmarnath S18-May-24 20:10 
GeneralRe: Wordle 1,065 - 5 4 me shoulda been 3 Pin
pkfox18-May-24 21:09
professionalpkfox18-May-24 21:09 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.