|
I have a harddisk which has 2 partitions. The first one C:(active partition) contains Windows 2000. Now i wish to move this OS to the second partition D: and make my computer boot from this partition. Is it possible? If so, how should i go about doing it?
<font=arial>Weiye Chen
When pursuing your dreams, don't forget to enjoy your life...
|
|
|
|
|
You'll have to reinstall Windows, and repartition the drive to make D: the primary partition. Extended partitions can be renamed, but not the boot partition. It gets really interesting on multiple drive systems - mine, for instance, boots to drive J: because of the peculiar arrangement of primary and extended partitions I had on the existing drives before I reinstalled Windows. Why do you want to make this move?
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm hoping someone knows enough about the history of Windows to explain some things. First, why would trackbars send WM_SCROLL messages? Even if they were going for a sort of backward compatibility that would have allowed programs that used scrollbars as trackbars to be upgraded just from resource changes, it seems to me that trackbars could have supported a mode that would have allowed them to send messages of a type that frameworks wouldn't already use for scrolling. Why did they make it so hard to use?
Also, the MSDN documentation says that TB_THUMBPOSITION is "WM_LBUTTONUP following a TB_THUMBTRACK notification message." This message would actually be useful if it were sent when the trackbar's position were updated by the keyboard. Instead, I have to check for every message except TB_THUMBTRACK and see if the position is different from my last recorded position to decide when a lasting adjustment to a thumb position is made. Why didn't they make TB_THUMBPOSITION work for that?
Nathan Holt
|
|
|
|
|
I'm currently running Windows XP on a LAN.
Using the OS ability to share folders and drives, I can enable my collegues to gain access to various parts of my PC. However I don't seem to be able to do this for mapped networked drives:
+ My Documents
- My Computer
+ (C)
+ DVD Drive(D)
+ (F) \\Somewhere\Somehow\
+ (G) \\Somewhere\Somehow\
+ (H) \\Somewhere\Somehow\
+ (I) \\Somewhere\Somehow\
So, from the above example, I can share my 'C' and 'D' drives and even parts of the 'My Documents' folder; but I cannot enable others to see my mapped 'F', 'G' etc, networked drives. Is there anyway that this can be done?
I Dream of Absolute Zero
|
|
|
|
|
If you can it is a bug in windows, at least by some arguments. Just because you have access to something does not mean you should be allowed to share it. Others who want access should get it from the origional server.
Note that there isn't much consences in the security community over this. However Microsoft appears to have taken the above position, and overall I'd say it is a good decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I have tried unsuccessfully on many sites to find the answer to this so kudos if you have any insight.
I am using schtasks
schtasks /Create /S WS2 /RU Administrator /RP Foobar /SC ONSTART /TN MyTask /TR C:\Admin\RunMe.bat
to create a task on a windows xp workstation remotely that runs a SYSTEM boot up. When I create the task remotely, occasionnaly it works fine, but usually i get a:
"trust relationship for this workstation and the primary domain failed"
error. I believe this might have something to do with the task trying to run before the network is fully set up etc, or somethign funky with active directory. If I run the task immedietly it works fine, only when I try to run the task on start, and only occasionally. The funny thing is, when I create the task I use the local Admin username and password, but I think it may fail because it seems to try to authenticate the credentials that I used to log into the machine to create the task FROM. Anyone know why this is happening and how to fix it?
thanks
steve
|
|
|
|
|
Try to read the following article from Here[^]
it might give you some idea.
Roath Kanel
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
On a client machine I've been unable to install any Windows Update since 6/10/04. It's Old Faithful, the trusty Pentium Pro 180MHz machine I built for Christmas '95, freshly reformatted and reborn with a clean installation of Win2K Pro and little else. SP4 was applied over the LAN from the server, MSDE from the CD with SQL Server SP4 installed from the server. Nothing else is on it.
Windows Update reports 9 Critical and 5 Windows Updates available - all fail to install, as a group or separately. Update.log shows that all were downloaded with a CRC error (Error 0x80070017). Repeatedly. It's unlikely to be a memory error, as Windows is running nicely, no quirky behaviors (other than the known ones). And the various utilities that come with it are all working perfectly. The disk drive checks out as undamaged, too.
Any ideas?
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
|
You could try downloading the updates from the KB article page (ie the standalone update) and see if they will install.
Matt Newman
What is your malfunction? - Dangeresque, too?
|
|
|
|
|
Roger, just in case there is a memory problem that hasn't raised it's head at a time you were around try MemTest86[^] or DocMemory[^].
Other than that I'll come over and we'll go round and see Billy Boy and get things sorted.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So i had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote:
I'll come over and we'll go round
Sounds good to me, Michael. When are you arriving? If you're coming in from the east, tell the pilot to turn left at Las Vegas. I'd come to visit you, but Australia doesn't want me. I've taken the test online, but like everyone else, they don't want anyone over 40.
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote:
Sounds good to me, Michael. When are you arriving? If you're coming in from the east, tell the pilot to turn left at Las Vegas.
The one and only time I made it to the US it was via Los Angeles and then on to Boston. So I take it I would have to turn right at Las Vegas.
Roger Wright wrote:
I'd come to visit you, but Australia doesn't want me. I've taken the test online, but like everyone else, they don't want anyone over 40.
Can you point me to this online test? I would like to show it to some of the wankers who work in the other departments of our unemployment system. A chunk of the useless scum to wade through my Work For the Dole scheme can't write English and can't speak it very well. Have f*** all education and absolutley no brains and only seem good for producing more brain-dead drains on society. If you can't get in how do these ignorant c***s. Heaps of them are over 40.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So i had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to retrieve remote machine users information, without domain administrator rights.
i am using NetUserInfo() with USER_INFO_1, but i am unable to get any sort of information. Can my problem be solved ?? and if yes then does anyone know any friendly way to get it solved.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to use a network drive on XP SP1a but I get Network Security Policy errors when I try to execute it from a network drive. Does anyone know how I can fix this?
Matt Newman
All rise for the honorable Judge Stone Cold Steve Austin - From Dilbert Episode 30
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! You must be sure that you have the necessary rights on the target drive. If its a folder, try right clicking on it if you have R/W access
solidsnake
|
|
|
|
|
snake32 wrote:
Hi! You must be sure that you have the necessary rights on the target drive. If its a folder, try right clicking on it if you have R/W access
I can't double check the access permissions cause the PSU on that machine blew up and I haven't gotten the new one yet, but I should have full access. I only have problems executing .NET applications because the location isn't fully trusted and I get security exceptions.
Matt Newman
What is your malfunction? - Dangeresque, too?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
WinXP: Try adding the IP address to the trusted sites (security tab) in the internet explorer options tab. Also, add the ip to the wins option in the properities of Network places. WinXP has an unusual amount of security that is good for home use but bad for business uses.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I got it fixed, what I did was opened the .Net framework wizards and adjusted the Local Area Zone to Full Trust. (Basically the same idea)
Matt Newman
What is your malfunction? - Dangeresque, too?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I am using a Win XP system. Recently there was a problem and I had to upgrade my display driver. After that I could not view any video in Windows MP or real player.I could hear the sound but couldnt see the video.
What could be the reason for this?.
Thanks,
Deepak Samuel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Download Windows MediaPlayer10 or download this program
BSPlayer...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there gurus
I have a problem: my PSU died a while ago (some may remember this) and when it was replaced it turned out that it had fried the onboard controller of my harddrive as well... Now the hard drive itself is no problem (it's already been replaced) but the data that's on it is. Before I get jeers about backups, they have been made (luckily) so all the "important" stuff has been saved, but all my personal stuff (disposable but lots of work to collect...) is lost. Now my question is this: would I be considered stark raving mad for asking if it's possible to get an identical drive (as far as that is possible) and screwing off the circuit board and fitting it on the other drive? Because I'm pretty much convinced the data itself is fine... Frankly I don't care if it's a crazy question, I'm asking it anyway.
*depressed*
Thanks in advance for any (useful) replies. 
Paul 
Blog: ZAblog.nl
MSN: tchwala@hotmail.com
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, its possible and I think its how they do data recovery from damaged systems. I can only see 2 possible places where something could go wrong.
1. The replacement HD has a differnt algorithm for saving/retreiving data and you can't read it
2. You accidently damage the platters during the swap.
Contrary to popular belief the platters aren't in a vacuum. I would say its doable, just don't spend to much money on the identical drive.
Matt Newman
All rise for the honorable Judge Stone Cold Steve Austin - From Dilbert Episode 30
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, I'll have to think about that one, it's still under warranty...
*indecision*
Paul
Blog: ZAblog.nl
MSN: tchwala@hotmail.com
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's worth a try, Paul. If you're certain that the platters and the transport hardware are not at fault, it might work. If it doesn't, you might also try installing the old platters into the new drive. I have a hunch, though, that the low-level formatting we don't usually do calibrates the drive media to the control hardware/firmware, and this may not work because of production tolerances that haven't been precisely matched to the unit. Still, it's worth a shot if the lost data is valuable enough. This could be a valuable article, if it works.;)
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
