System Admin

FirstPrevNext

Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Mike Dimmick9-Jul-04 5:26 Mike Dimmick 9-Jul-04 5:26  Anonymous wrote: I also keep the case open 24/7. Don't. Airflow is typically better if you assemble the case properly. If it still gets too hot, you need an exhaust fan in the box and reasonable airflow in the room - if you put the back of the system too close to the wall, the hot air has nowhere to go and simply gets sucked straight back into the system. Cooling systems work best with a low ambient temperature. My P4 2.8GHz system has the normal PSU fan, CPU fan and a fan on the graphics card, but it also has a smallish 8cm fan in the front of the case and a 12cm fan in the back. All those fans are quite noisy, which is why I used a case which comes with a large amount of acoustic wadding (from QuietPC.com[^]). The fans mostly came from QuietPC as well, but five fans still make quite a bit of noise. Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Anonymous9-Jul-04 12:30 Anonymous 9-Jul-04 12:30  Blah. Another crash after 2 days. The computer was idle. It crashed while I was in the other room. There was no programs running. Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.3.0017.0 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loading Dump File [C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini070904-01.dmp] Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available Symbol search path is: C:\WINNT\Symbols Executable search path is: Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2 Windows 2000 Kernel Version 2195 (Service Pack 4) UP Free x86 compatible Kernel base = 0x80400000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x8046e8f0 Debug session time: Fri Jul 09 18:15:50 2004 System Uptime: not available Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2 Loading Kernel Symbols ........................................................................................................ Loading unloaded module list ....................................... Loading User Symbols ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information. BugCheck 7F, {d, 0, 0, 0} Probably caused by : ntoskrnl.exe ( nt!KiSystemFatalException+e ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP (7f) This means a trap occurred in kernel mode, and it's a trap of a kind that the kernel isn't allowed to have/catch (bound trap) or that is always instant death (double fault). The first number in the bugcheck params is the number of the trap (8 = double fault, etc) Consult an Intel x86 family manual to learn more about what these traps are. Here is a *portion* of those codes: If kv shows a taskGate use .tss on the part before the colon, then kv. Else if kv shows a trapframe use .trap on that value Else .trap on the appropriate frame will show where the trap was taken (on x86, this will be the ebp that goes with the procedure KiTrap) Endif kb will then show the corrected stack. Arguments: Arg1: 0000000d, EXCEPTION_GP_FAULT Arg2: 00000000 Arg3: 00000000 Arg4: 00000000 Debugging Details: ------------------ BUGCHECK_STR: 0x7f_d CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: DRIVER_FAULT LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 8049747e to 80469822 STACK_TEXT: ed17f7dc 8049747e ed17f84c e37194b0 00000000 nt!KiSystemFatalException+0xe ed17f854 8049803f e32ff728 00200080 ed17f8b8 nt!HvpGetCellPaged+0x35 ed17f864 80497b44 e37f0568 ed17f8f8 00000000 nt!CmpQuerySecurityDescriptorInfo+0x10 ed17f8b8 804507ac e3e99140 00000001 ed17f8f8 nt!CmpSecurityMethod+0xb4 ed17f8f0 8045043d 0000000f ed17f91c ed17f910 nt!ObGetObjectSecurity+0x60 ed17f920 80497dd1 e3e99140 ed17fbf4 00000001 nt!ObCheckObjectAccess+0x28 ed17f948 804976f2 e32ff728 0000e500 e331f504 nt!CmpDoOpen+0x210 ed17fb40 804516eb e32ff728 818a89e0 ed17fbf4 nt!CmpParseKey+0x389 ed17fbb4 80496299 000001e0 ed17fcb0 00000040 nt!ObpLookupObjectName+0xdf ed17fcc4 80497c7c 00000000 818a89e0 8122da01 nt!ObOpenObjectByName+0xc5 ed17fd50 80465b91 0006fd2c 00020019 0006f59c nt!NtOpenKey+0x151 ed17fd50 77f833c0 0006fd2c 00020019 0006f59c nt!KiSystemService+0xc4 WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong. 0006f540 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x77f833c0 FOLLOWUP_IP: nt!KiSystemFatalException+e 80469822 ?? ??? SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 0 FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner SYMBOL_NAME: nt!KiSystemFatalException+e MODULE_NAME: nt IMAGE_NAME: ntoskrnl.exe DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4047db83 STACK_COMMAND: kb BUCKET_ID: 0x7f_d_nt!KiSystemFatalException+e Followup: MachineOwner I havent had this error yet. Whats this one all about? Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Anonymous9-Jul-04 12:31 Anonymous 9-Jul-04 12:31  I have new RAM on order BTW. It's my guess that the RAM is the possible culprit. Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Roger Wright9-Jul-04 17:31 Roger Wright 9-Jul-04 17:31  See Win32 Error Codes[^] for clues. For one thing, Win32 Error 2 indicates that a file could not be found. Secondly, a driver fault is indicated. The line: "WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong. 0006f540 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x77f833c0" Indicates that the Instruction pointer is referencing a memory address that Windows doesn't recognize as being in use, hence the data there is probably invalid. Executing it will most likely cause a serious failure. I suspect that a driver has become corrupted; isolating it will be a tedious process. Boot in Step-by-Step Confirmation mode and disable all driver loading except the basics - disk controller, keyboard, mouse, video, etc. If the failure happens on this load, you may have a motherboard or firmware (BIOS) problem. If the problem doesn't recur, boot again and enable loading of a few drivers, then wait for a failure. If none occurs, reboot again and add a few more drivers to the allowed set, repeating this procedure until a failure happens. Go back a step and enable the most recent group of enabled drivers one at a time to determine which one causes the failure. Replace that driver from the original media or with an updated version compatible with your OS version. You might also have a version conflict among the many dlls used by Windows, but the error logs don't look like that's the problem this time. Running SFC from the Start/Run menu may reveal something useful. "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Anonymous9-Jul-04 13:18 Anonymous 9-Jul-04 13:18  Sad, sad day... Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.3.0017.0 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loading Dump File [C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini070904-02.dmp] Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available Symbol search path is: C:\WINNT\Symbols Executable search path is: Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2 Windows 2000 Kernel Version 2195 (Service Pack 4) UP Free x86 compatible Kernel base = 0x80400000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0x8046e8f0 Debug session time: Fri Jul 09 19:19:50 2004 System Uptime: not available Unable to load image ntoskrnl.exe, Win32 error 2 Loading Kernel Symbols ....................................................................................................... Loading unloaded module list .......... Loading User Symbols ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information. BugCheck A, {a668c4d0, 2, 1, 80448ed8} Unable to load image SYMEVENT.SYS, Win32 error 2 *** WARNING: Unable to verify timestamp for SYMEVENT.SYS *** ERROR: Module load completed but symbols could not be loaded for SYMEVENT.SYS Probably caused by : SYMEVENT.SYS ( SYMEVENT+4a7e ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (a) An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is usually caused by drivers using improper addresses. If a kernel debugger is available get the stack backtrace. Arguments: Arg1: a668c4d0, memory referenced Arg2: 00000002, IRQL Arg3: 00000001, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation Arg4: 80448ed8, address which referenced memory Debugging Details: ------------------ WRITE_ADDRESS: unable to read from 80483450 unable to read from 80482ea8 unable to read from 80482d78 unable to read from 80475234 unable to read from 80482d90 unable to read from 80482ea4 unable to read from 80475238 unable to read from 80482f64 unable to read from 80483420 a668c4d0 CURRENT_IRQL: 2 FAULTING_IP: nt!MiRemovePageFromList+55 80448ed8 ?? ??? CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 2 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: DRIVER_FAULT BUGCHECK_STR: 0xA LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 804494c9 to 80448ed8 TRAP_FRAME: bd1b4938 -- (.trap ffffffffbd1b4938) ErrCode = 00000002 eax=649b6a99 ebx=ffffffff ecx=818d7000 edx=81a56e20 esi=818d6fe8 edi=80474c30 eip=80448ed8 esp=bd1b49ac ebp=bd1b49ec iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz ac pe cy cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010293 nt!MiRemovePageFromList+0x55: 80448ed8 ?? ??? Resetting default scope STACK_TEXT: bd1b49b4 804494c9 863b3c28 80442b78 e39610a4 nt!MiRemovePageFromList+0x55 bd1b49bc 80442b78 e39610a4 fffff000 004884d0 nt!MiRemoveAnyPage+0x6f bd1b49ec 804425e1 ffb977c0 863b3c7c 00001000 nt!MiResolveMappedFileFault+0x319 bd1b4a18 80441960 00000000 cfbe909c c033efa4 nt!MiResolveProtoPteFault+0x128 bd1b4a60 8044ad48 00000000 cfbe909c c033efa4 nt!MiDispatchFault+0x13d bd1b4aac 80447c52 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt!MmAccessFault+0x682 bd1b4adc 8040dbc8 cfbe909c 00000000 ffba1028 nt!MmCheckCachedPageState+0x28e bd1b4b9c 804c971a ffba1028 0002909c 00000400 nt!CcFastCopyRead+0x1d5 bd1b4c20 bd050a7e ffba1028 bd1b4cfc 00000400 nt!FsRtlCopyRead+0x1c9 WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 SYMEVENT+0x4a7e FOLLOWUP_IP: SYMEVENT+4a7e bd050a7e ?? ??? SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 9 FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner SYMBOL_NAME: SYMEVENT+4a7e MODULE_NAME: SYMEVENT IMAGE_NAME: SYMEVENT.SYS DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 3f31ac37 STACK_COMMAND: .trap ffffffffbd1b4938 ; kb BUCKET_ID: 0xA_W_SYMEVENT+4a7e Followup: MachineOwner --------- Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Anonymous9-Jul-04 16:31 Anonymous 9-Jul-04 16:31  This is so frustrating, because I'm good with computers and I take good care of this on. The only damn reason I'm using windows is so I can play counter-strike. Re: Can you read this MiniDump? Tim Deveaux11-Jul-04 3:39 Tim Deveaux 11-Jul-04 3:39  This looks to me like pesky hardware failure. The double fault above is particularly indicative - essentially, it couldn't even blue screen [edit]/trap the exception[/edit] properly. Verifying a solution will be tough. You could remove the paint and slip a new machine underneath, but that seems overly pessimistic. I wonder if you could monitor the CPU temp somehow. I have seen machines bs when their fans got stuck, and these are the sort of [edit]useless[/edit] bugchecks you get. If we had a graph of CPU temp redlining, or not, it might give us something to work with. A colleague had a open box at the office that would bs if you touched the ram. Often, we would taunt him a second time! I leave you now with some pithy quotes: "If you would see the invisible, you must look carefully at the visible" Santayana "Eliminate the impossible, and all that is left, however improbable, must be the truth" S. Holmes. "The Force Luke... use the Force" O.Kenobi Whatever. Keep us posted, and good luck. Use the common IIS WebServer in a LAN swarnamanoo7-Jul-04 21:41 swarnamanoo 7-Jul-04 21:41  Hi all.. I've installed an IIS WebServer in a server and all the users in the LAN must be able to access that.When we are trying to develop a web application and run it on a different system,It is posting an error saying "Error while trying to run project:Unable to start debugging on the web server.Access is denied" Though i've given debugger permissions for all on the server,its not working.can any one help me out in this issue. Re: Use the common IIS WebServer in a LAN Mekong River8-Jul-04 12:27 Mekong River 8-Jul-04 12:27  Try to read an article from the following site: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B306172[^] http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=306165&product=aspnet[^] it might give you some idea to solve the problem. Roath Kanel APO-CEDC Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office how to include username/password a URL Hong Dat Huynh6-Jul-04 20:13 Hong Dat Huynh 6-Jul-04 20:13  My ASP.NET web applicaton includes a window media player (wmp) object. I'm using that wmp object to play a .wmv file in the network share folder. something like <object style="Z-INDEX: 0; LEFT: 0px; RIGHT: 0px; TOP: 0px; BOTTOM= 0px; WIDTH= 100%; HEIGHT= 100%" classid="clsid:6BF52A52-394A-11D3-B153-00C04F79FAA6" id="winMediaPlayer"> <param name="URL" value="\\192.168.100.100\sharefolder\video.wmv" /> Form1.winMediaPlayer.controls.stop(); However, since at the moment I can not include the username/password to access the folder in the url, Windows Media Player gives an error message "Windows Media Player can not copy or play the file because the server denied access to it. Verify that you have access rights to the file, and then try again". Note that no authentication window appeared so that I could authenticate. wmp simply gave the above error message. That is the reason I want to include the username and password in the URL. Is it possible to include the username and password within the URL \\serverIP\sharedFolder\filename.wmv ? I know how to do that in a ftp or http URL such as ftp://username:password@serverIP/filename http://username:password@serverIP/filename.html, but not with the above URL. Thanks. Dialup connection on win98 Mazdak5-Jul-04 21:37 Mazdak 5-Jul-04 21:37  I want to format my win98 and install it again. I have a dial up connection on it which I forget its password. I want to use it again after I format/install myy win98. I know some utility like pwl tool or unlock password which I can get that password, but I can't find them. Could someone please give me FREE download of one of these utilities. Mazy "One who dives deep gets the pearls,the burning desire for realization brings the goal nearer." - Babuji Re: Dialup connection on win98 Mekong River8-Jul-04 12:18 Mekong River 8-Jul-04 12:18  How about your ISP? if it is possible you could ask your ISP for your password. Once you have it, you could proceed your task. Roath Kanel APO-CEDC Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office Will Ms stop upgrading w2k after wxp sp2 is released? kfaday4-Jul-04 13:22 kfaday 4-Jul-04 13:22  i mean upgrading as of releasing patches, giving support, etc Anybody know anything about this? this made me wonder about that: <url>http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~normanb/ Re: Will Ms stop upgrading w2k after wxp sp2 is released? Michael Dunn5-Jul-04 6:24 Michael Dunn 5-Jul-04 6:24  This page[^] says that mainstream support for Win 2K ends on June 30 next year. --Mike-- Personal stuff:: Ericahist | Homepage Shareware stuff:: 1ClickPicGrabber | RightClick-Encrypt CP stuff:: CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ ---- Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so Brain, but if we shaved our heads, we'd look like weasels! Re: Will Ms stop upgrading w2k after wxp sp2 is released? Mike Dimmick5-Jul-04 13:03 Mike Dimmick 5-Jul-04 13:03  This news article[^] from April says that Microsoft will be working on Windows 2000 SP5 once XP SP2 is released (although there's probably quite a bit of parallel running). An interview with Bob Muglia[^] confirms what will be in SP5. Extended support continues until 2010 - see the Lifecycle Support Policy FAQ[^]: "Extended support includes all paid support options and security-related hotfix support that is provided at no charge. Hotfix support that is not security-related requires a separate extended hotfix support contract to be purchased within 90 days after mainstream support ends. Microsoft will not accept requests for warranty support, design changes, or new features during the extended support phase." Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder Problem using yahoo with outlook express or outlook Mekong River3-Jul-04 6:53 Mekong River 3-Jul-04 6:53  Hi, i have a problem with my outlook express and outlook. I create new account for an e-mail system, i choose POP3/SMTP account type from the screen wizard. I type my user name and password. I also type pop.mail.yahoo.com and smtp.mail.yahoo.com for POP and SMTP. But when I connect to get an e-mail the machine is asking me many time to fill the information about user name and password. Does anyone know about this problem? Roath Kanel APO-CEDC Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office Moving OS between partitions Weiye Chen30-Jun-04 22:39 Weiye Chen 30-Jun-04 22:39  I have a harddisk which has 2 partitions. The first one C:(active partition) contains Windows 2000. Now i wish to move this OS to the second partition D: and make my computer boot from this partition. Is it possible? If so, how should i go about doing it? <font=arial>Weiye Chen When pursuing your dreams, don't forget to enjoy your life... Re: Moving OS between partitions Roger Wright1-Jul-04 5:36 Roger Wright 1-Jul-04 5:36  You'll have to reinstall Windows, and repartition the drive to make D: the primary partition. Extended partitions can be renamed, but not the boot partition. It gets really interesting on multiple drive systems - mine, for instance, boots to drive J: because of the peculiar arrangement of primary and extended partitions I had on the existing drives before I reinstalled Windows. Why do you want to make this move? Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group. Trackbar (slider) wierdness Nathan Holt at EMOM29-Jun-04 6:46 Nathan Holt at EMOM 29-Jun-04 6:46  I'm hoping someone knows enough about the history of Windows to explain some things. First, why would trackbars send WM_SCROLL messages? Even if they were going for a sort of backward compatibility that would have allowed programs that used scrollbars as trackbars to be upgraded just from resource changes, it seems to me that trackbars could have supported a mode that would have allowed them to send messages of a type that frameworks wouldn't already use for scrolling. Why did they make it so hard to use? Also, the MSDN documentation says that TB_THUMBPOSITION is "WM_LBUTTONUP following a TB_THUMBTRACK notification message." This message would actually be useful if it were sent when the trackbar's position were updated by the keyboard. Instead, I have to check for every message except TB_THUMBTRACK and see if the position is different from my last recorded position to decide when a lasting adjustment to a thumb position is made. Why didn't they make TB_THUMBPOSITION work for that? Nathan Holt Shared Drive RChin28-Jun-04 3:39 RChin 28-Jun-04 3:39  I'm currently running Windows XP on a LAN. Using the OS ability to share folders and drives, I can enable my collegues to gain access to various parts of my PC. However I don't seem to be able to do this for mapped networked drives: + My Documents - My Computer + (C) + DVD Drive(D) + (F) \\Somewhere\Somehow\ + (G) \\Somewhere\Somehow\ + (H) \\Somewhere\Somehow\ + (I) \\Somewhere\Somehow\ So, from the above example, I can share my 'C' and 'D' drives and even parts of the 'My Documents' folder; but I cannot enable others to see my mapped 'F', 'G' etc, networked drives. Is there anyway that this can be done? I Dream of Absolute Zero Re: Shared Drive Henry miller28-Jun-04 4:07 Henry miller 28-Jun-04 4:07  If you can it is a bug in windows, at least by some arguments. Just because you have access to something does not mean you should be allowed to share it. Others who want access should get it from the origional server. Note that there isn't much consences in the security community over this. However Microsoft appears to have taken the above position, and overall I'd say it is a good decision. Can anyone answer? schtasks... LeprosyLM28-Jun-04 3:18 LeprosyLM 28-Jun-04 3:18  Hello, I have tried unsuccessfully on many sites to find the answer to this so kudos if you have any insight. I am using schtasks schtasks /Create /S WS2 /RU Administrator /RP Foobar /SC ONSTART /TN MyTask /TR C:\Admin\RunMe.bat to create a task on a windows xp workstation remotely that runs a SYSTEM boot up. When I create the task remotely, occasionnaly it works fine, but usually i get a: "trust relationship for this workstation and the primary domain failed" error. I believe this might have something to do with the task trying to run before the network is fully set up etc, or somethign funky with active directory. If I run the task immedietly it works fine, only when I try to run the task on start, and only occasionally. The funny thing is, when I create the task I use the local Admin username and password, but I think it may fail because it seems to try to authenticate the credentials that I used to log into the machine to create the task FROM. Anyone know why this is happening and how to fix it? thanks steve Re: Can anyone answer? schtasks... Mekong River29-Jun-04 4:34 Mekong River 29-Jun-04 4:34  Try to read the following article from Here[^] it might give you some idea. Roath Kanel APO-CEDC Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office Windows Update Failures Roger Wright25-Jun-04 20:46 Roger Wright 25-Jun-04 20:46  On a client machine I've been unable to install any Windows Update since 6/10/04. It's Old Faithful, the trusty Pentium Pro 180MHz machine I built for Christmas '95, freshly reformatted and reborn with a clean installation of Win2K Pro and little else. SP4 was applied over the LAN from the server, MSDE from the CD with SQL Server SP4 installed from the server. Nothing else is on it. Windows Update reports 9 Critical and 5 Windows Updates available - all fail to install, as a group or separately. Update.log shows that all were downloaded with a CRC error (Error 0x80070017). Repeatedly. It's unlikely to be a memory error, as Windows is running nicely, no quirky behaviors (other than the known ones). And the various utilities that come with it are all working perfectly. The disk drive checks out as undamaged, too. Any ideas? Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group. Re: Windows Update Failures Matt Newman26-Jun-04 6:00 Matt Newman 26-Jun-04 6:00  You could try downloading the updates from the KB article page (ie the standalone update) and see if they will install. Matt Newman What is your malfunction? - Dangeresque, too?

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 17-May-24 12:45 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...363364365366367368369370371372 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.