On the subject of codeproject voting ... a dilemma

Because you're helping to organized the site. You also organize by voting, bookmarking, downloading, and other things. Caring about votes will come - be patient, young Jedi. :)

If you're a person like you describe, please, do me a favor, look at my articles/tips, may be even answers.
If you could offer me some valid criticism (not necessarily constructive!) I would be much more grateful than if you supplied me with tons of articles on technology.

Criticism can be much more valuable. There is too much technical information out there. It can turn into valuable knowledge only it it is digested by the reader, not another writer. By many reasons information digested by someone else does not help much. More importantly, if you simply read it, you cannot trust it until you understand it with mathematical accuracy and grind through you own experience. It all takes considerable amount of labor. When we do this work, you all makes some mistakes which can gravely erode the value of our knowledge. Peer review and criticism is the only thing which help to dig out our deeply rooted or casual mistakes. We can trust science only because scientific method includes multiple check ups of the result from different stand points by different people. Same thing happens in technology.

Perhaps most people are more or less illiterate in their profession. One of the main reason for that is the lack of culture of listening to criticism and using it for improvement of work.

If you can really play the role of critic and you can do it really well, you can be most valuable person in our effort to exchange technological knowledge and experience — for those who is able to value it.

—SA