The monthly survey lists some of the best articles of the month. Some of which I might have seen but also lots which I missed. Having to vote manually I have to take a look at those articles first to build my opinion. If there was an automatically generated list I would probably not even notice them or I wouldn't feel the need to look at them all individually as I do now.
I believe a nomination for the article of the month survey is a huge oppurtunity also for topics which aren't targeting a wide audiance but in itself are an interesting read.
I would say the automatic selection to popup a list of candidates to the competition. Then manually voting which of them are really to get into the competition.
The manual vote could be done for a kind of comitee or by people with a minimum rep to avoid socket puppets.
The final contest of article of the month, open to all users as always.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I like the idea of automatic selection, thought it would be helpful to be shown a list of contenders towards the end of the competition. The reminder often leads me to articles I would have otherwise missed.
It might be worth adding a "Best Tip" in each class as well - there are some good tips out there which should perhaps be recognised.
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
I don't like this idea for many reasons:
* Articles that are updated very often usually got a lot more views than articles that are only published once and never corrected (maybe because they don't need corrections at all);
* Articles with many different downloads may get a lot more downloads simply because some people download all the files. That is, 1 file to download may get 1000 downloads. 5 files to download may get 3500 downloads (I am not considering everyone will get the 5 files).
Also, there is the problem that most popular doesn't mean best article... in fact, many bad articles become very popular and generate a lot of discussions simply because they have problems.
It would be nice if had a committee ( ) of Code Projects MVPs who would give their marks.
Their mark (median of or all their marks or something along those lines) should be combined with votes per category and ratings within given period.