|
seems legit 
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Debbie Does Anne Summers.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Care Bears: Man of war
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toys in the Bedroom with Paris
|
|
|
|
|
Now I lay me down to sleep
I pray the Lord my soul to keep
If I die before I wake
I pray the Lord my soul to take
Or did you mean the city Paris ? 
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking that I should perfactly learn bootstrap because it makes easy and responsive design of your application. I don't need a designer to create template for me and consistent look. Bootstrap provide a couple of additional .less files, and @importthem in bootstrap.less. I use one for variables, imported right below variables.less and one for classes, imported at the end of the boostrap.less list. This way, I ensure that I can override both variables and classes.
When I implement bootstratp2 with MVC than UI code makes more lengthy . I add lot of span and div so I download twitterbootstrapmvc and it makes easy development for me. This time all this are open source and free.
But now we have bootstrap 3 (css +js) that is free and open source so we can use it and modify it. But again it makes more lengthy UI design so we need to download twitterbootstrapmvc but this time it is paid and I think, Bootstrap price($59.99) is not a reasonable price so I am not using it further. What happen when Dmitry A. Efimenko decide it more high price. What do you think?
I should be continuing with this while I am not using it any commercial application?
|
|
|
|
|
I am kind of lost. Bootstrap is Free, and TwitterBootstrapMVC is also Free. So what is the problem?
Also I don't see how Bootstrap makes the UI code lengthy, you just need to learn using the bootstrap properly. When we were using Bootstrap for our ASP.Net MVC Web Application, we had created a set of custom scaffolding templates for CRUD Views, which was utilizing the Bootstrap. It was easy to implement and very fast to use.
I would suggest you to properly learn take a closer look at the Bootstrap 3 and ditch the TwitterBootstrapMVC. IMHO You should not rely on something that is already relying on something else, specially when both the things are open-source and free.
Sandeep Singh Shekhawat wrote: What happen when Dmitry A. Efimenko decide it more high price. What do you think?
Exactly, even worse what will happen when they stopped supporting it, or close down the project. These are the risks you take when you use someone else's code/work for free. Goes for every open-source project.
To avoid this, we have created our own custom-css / javascript to support responsive design in our ASP.Net MVC Web Application. Trust me the CSS3 + Media-Queries are not that complex to learn.
Also our in-house alternative works much better since we are the one who have developed it for ourselves. Now we are not relying on bootstrap, and the best part is one less framework to chase when they release a new version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh! I missed that. You are right, that price is ridiculous. Just ditch that and use the Bootstrap directly.
I still think that the UI Code required by Bootstrap is not lengthy. Take a look.[^]
Just put some extra efforts in creating a set of Custom Scaffolding Templates using Bootstrap. And it will be very simple to use.
|
|
|
|
|
It is ok with APS.NET Web Form but what do you think about ASP.NET MVC where you need lot of span and div tags?
|
|
|
|
|
I was talking about the ASP.Net MVC only.
Yes, there are few more Divs than usual, but they are not 'a lot'. Also the default views in MVC 5 are much more cleaner than MVC 3/4. So the key is to create a clean scaffolding template using Bootstrap for MVC 5.
And if you don't want to create the templates by yourself. Download[^] this nuget package and customize it. But this is again just like your previous experience, depending upon something that is relying on something else.
|
|
|
|
|
Rutvik Dave wrote: TwitterBootstrapMVC is also Free
It was. That author is CP member. Initially it was free but later not. We just noticed that some new members're posted questions(regarding license) in Q/A section & the article's forum. Now that article marked has been deleted.
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I see.
I am not a licensing expert, but I don't think you can charge for something that is derived from MIT License.
|
|
|
|
|
I was about to start learning that but unfortunately that's not free anymore.
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I'm going to buy a Lumia phone. One of my friend suggested me Nokia Lumia 1320.
Can you guys plz add your inputs & suggestions.
Thanks.
Mohammed Hameed.
|
|
|
|
|
1320 is a nice phone. The screen has bit lower resolution when comparing with the screen-size (same thing with the 625), but other than that it's a good device.
I would suggest you to spend 6-7k Rupees more and consider 925. It's a very nice phone, also it has a perfect manageable screen-size and a great camera. (IMO: 1320 / 1520 are big phones, but that's a personal preference).
I you are not much into the gaming (< 1 GB ram), 720 is a nice budget phone with a long lasting battery life (2 full days on a single charge).
And if you want to consider cheaper Android phone, take a look at the Moto G. (much better than the cheaper and terrible Samsung galaxy phone lineup)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Rutvik for the valuable info...
Mohammed Hameed.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen any for it; but reviews of it's high end sibling the 1520 complained that instead of being an all more small stuff for young geeks with good eyes or an all large print for old people phablet that WP8 ended up being a mishmash of the two paradigms that was unlikely to make either group happy. Supposedly the next WP update is going to fix this; but I'd be cautious about buying a WP8 phablet until I knew which way they went (or if they made it user configurable).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outernet: [^]
"By leveraging datacasting technology over a low-cost satellite constellation, Outernet is able to bypass censorship, ensure privacy, and offer a universally-accessible information service at no cost to global citizens. It's the modern version of shortwave radio, or BitTorrent from space." And, their goals, for starters, are rather modest:
"WHAT WILL OUTERNET DELIVER?
NEWS AND INFORMATION
International and local news
Crop prices for farmers
Bitcoin blockchains
APPLICATIONS AND CONTENT
Ubuntu & OpenStreetMap
Wikipedia in its entirety
Movies, music, games
EDUCATIONAL COURSEWARE
Khan Academy and Coursera
British Council's LearnEnglish
Teachers Without Borders
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
Used when cellular networks fail
Disaster relief coordination
Global notification system"Oh my: yet another bright shining future to live for ... mmmm.
“But I don't want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can't help that,” said the Cat: “we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.”
“How do you know I'm mad?” said Alice.
“You must be," said the Cat, or you wouldn't have come here.” Lewis Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
So...no google then? 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)