|
I will upgrade in a heartbeat. I've been using windows 8.1 for a while now and despite wanting to pull my hairs out on the first few weeks, I barely feel I'm not using Windows 7 anymore.
8.1 improved usability a lot over 8.0 for desktop users. I can only expect Windows 10 will be much better.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
----
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
Everything since XP has been basically the same kernel, a few added userland features, and a different window manager (user interface).
I've been on Windows 10 for about 3 months. I'm still finding and reporting bugs, but nothing major, and only UI stuff. There was nothing wrong with Windows 8, except they made bad decisions about the UI. A replacement shell like Classic Shell makes it fine.
However, a clean install of Windows 8 is about 20 gigabytes.
I can't think of a good reason to migrate a server from 2008 to 2012 until security patches are discontinued.
|
|
|
|
|
Based on my experience with Windows 8 (cr*p), don't upgrade to W10 if you have W7.
If you have W8, by all means upgrade (W10 couldn't be any worse).
(I'm not even talking W8 UI; that beast hangs at least once every couple of days for me).
|
|
|
|
|
I think after android most general people are now aware of open source and people will soon shift their all personal computer uses to linux distributions thats why windows 10 will not be successful much.
Another reason windows 10 will be free upgrade even for pirated users the value of windows will now decrease.
A nightmare for everybody is that after announcing windows 10 free, microsoft may not integrate adwares to its operating system 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been testing Win 10 since its first preview release and find it to be an excellent OS.
That said, it is different than Win 7 from a user's point of view.
So I suggest you base your decision on your 12 users. How adaptable are they? Perhaps it's better to consider how change-resistant are they?
I've been programming since before there were PCs and the most difficult part of any job has not been the implementation of the change, but rather the change itself. People are very resistant to change in their work environments and that in itself can be enough to scuttle some projects.
The Win server 2008 is a non-issue.
Hope this helps
Murray
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) 10 for the money. 10 for the glory. 10 for the world. Viva la revolución!
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the hardest reason not to upgrade as soon as it is available is that it is not in your DNA or in your companies DNA. So expect a few generations of employees to mutate and acquire the skills to be early ad safe adopters.
Frank Silva
|
|
|
|
|
After asking a question on how to upgrade to 8.1 a lot of respectable ![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) ians have told me that it was a bad idea doing that (going from 7 to 8.1) and of course, I've wondered what is so terrible about it as it Works for me...
So here's another question: why 7 is much better tan 8.1 or if you prefer... why 8.1 is as terrible compared to 7?
Please don't start flame wars or similar... everyone has its opinion and it must be respected.
I'll start:
windows 8 pro's:
- Internet explorer 11 knows that it has to change it's spell check when you change the input language.
- You can pause large file operations.
- It starts really fast.
- When you start several copy operations all of them are stacked onto one single dialog.
- Once you know that windows+c shortcut getting into the control panel is a breeze.
- In a multi display environment you have the task bar in all the displays and then you can reach all your open programs from any display and show the start menu in the display you are looking at...
windows 7 pro's:
- start menu is much better.
...
modified 18-Mar-15 13:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Why does Win8 suck? Simple...
Your computer has installed updates and will restart in 30 minutes
[Restart Now] [Close]
I clicked Close, because I'll restart when I'm %(*#ing well ready to restart... Go back to doing things...
Your computer has installed updates and will restart in 15 minutes
[Restart Now] [Close]
What the elephant? I told it to shut up!
...and so on, until the automatic reboot...
Obviously, once I experienced that, I turned it off so it'll never do that again... But no operating system should force a reboot like that, without even giving an option to postpone.
The start screen is annoying, but not a deal-breaker... Haven't found anything else I hate about it yet... Of course, I only have it on my laptop, not my Win7 desktop, so it hasn't seen heavy use.
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly they have also taken that idea to Windows Server 2012 too
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
It did pretty much the same thing on Win 7, but you could choose to postpone any reminders for four hours, which was much more reasonable.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Huh. Mine has never done that. All I get are the updates being installed when I shutdown or reboot. What am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
What you've got there is a bad case of unchecked I.T. administrator arrogance.
(Heyyyy here's something that'll make my job a teensy bit easier... And screw the people whose work it trashes, they stepped away from their computer, so fsck them.)
|
|
|
|
|
Umm, no... Home machine, not work. That's out-of-the-box behavior, courtesy of Lenovo
|
|
|
|
|
So... the administrator works at Lenovo, setting those defaults.
Maybe it was the same person that installed the giant advertisement pushing security hole, maybe just part of the team.
|
|
|
|
|
Work environment: Windows 7 Enterprise
Home environment: Windows 8.1
I like the 'Start' button Windows 7, but, being in a corporate environment, we get patches pushed when someone else decides and the laptop will restart after a defined period. No, I can't shut it off.
So, the auto-restart isn't an issue - I'm going to get auto-restart either way.
On Windows 8.1, we have an account for my wife and myself; a separate account for our daughter. I like being able to use parental controls to limit what she sees and limit the amount of time she can be on the computer.
For a home machine, I haven't found anything issues to complain about.\
Is the layout different? Yes, but the layout was different going from a green screen in college to Windows 3, and then again on Windows 95... Change is constant.
Tim
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Carmichael wrote: Change is constant.
True. It would be nice if we'd only commit those changes that are actually improvements, cause quite often they are just that - changes.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Right, change for change's sake is user-hostile.
Let me pick which changes to activate!
|
|
|
|
|
You're awesome!!! We need to get that valuable knowledge out to the voters before November, 2016!! I mean seriously, if you're just voting for change, all you are doing is rolling the dice. And if you already live in the best country in the world (based on who is trying to get in and who is trying to get out  ), you probably wouldn't want TOO much to change randomly.
hatfok
King Yiddum's Castle
Pegasus Galaxy
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Carmichael wrote: Is the layout different? Yes, but the layout was different going from a green screen in college to Windows 3, and then again on Windows 95... Change is constant.
Ah, but it doesn't have to be. It's a balancing act, between progress (change is good!) and what is already good and familiar (change is bad!)
I see it as kind of like the progression of cooking (speaking from personal experience here...)
DOS and earlier were kind of like PB&J sandwiches. Basic, but kept you fed.
Windows 3/3.1 etc were like microwave ramen. Slightly more difficult to make, but still, kept you fed.
Windows 95 was a step up to grilled cheese. Getting better, but still, not all that great.
Windows 98 was adding ham to that grilled cheese.
Windows 2000 was pairing cream of tomato soup with that grilled ham and cheese.
Windows ME was back to ramen.
Windows XP was a medium sirloin with a loaded baked potato. Close, but not quite there yet.
Windows 7 was a perfectly cooked rare filet mignon with a loaded baked potato and asparagus with hollandaise. Perfection.
Now Windows 8... That is like you took a look at that beautiful meal that was Windows 7... And got greedy. You said 'I want more. I can do better.' But what you ended up with was an over-seasoned, over-cooked, filet, a potato with flavors that don't pair well, and hollandaise with a consistency that more closely resembles cold butter, than maple syrup. All because you couldn't leave well enough alone. Now your wife is upset with you because you ruined her favorite meal, and you had to order pizza.
Progress only comes from experimentation, and we certainly learn more from our failures than our successes. Still, you have to learn when to leave well enough alone. Microsoft has been in business long enough now that they should have already learned that lesson.
|
|
|
|
|
I note that you forgot Vista.
I bet you'll forget Win 8 even quicker.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Vista: Bleah! Did you have to remind me of that disaster? 
|
|
|
|
|
Y'know what's really funny?
I still have a Vista PC in use, mainly as a file server, but I still sometimes sit at it.
I think I'm one of the nine people in the world who didn't have a problem with Vista -- the only thing I objected to was the "wow factor", but the first time I booted the PC, it asked me if I wanted the "wow factor" cr@p, I said "NO!", and it never bothered me about it again.
It was lovely and fast, with all that memory that was added to handle the "wow" being freed up.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've still got a laptop running Vista mainly being used as a media device. I agree, I didn't have a problem with Vista, other than the fact it was over hyped and didn't add anything to XP. As for Win 8.1, I've got 2 PCs and a tablet running it and I really only have 2 dislikes
1) No start menu
2) The hover in the lower right you have to do to get the settings to show up
Other than that it's not that bad and the wife and kids are able to use it effectively. I'm still running Win 7 on my PC but, like with Vista, I didn't have a compelling reason to upgrade to 8.1. I will be upgrading it to Win 10, mostly cause it's a free upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
Guess I'm one of the few people that use third party menu apps in Windows... Had Classic Shell running since switched from XP to Win 7.
Never actually noticed the lack of menu in Win 8.
Classic Shell had 15 million downloads according to SourceForge. Probably about 1% of the Win 8.x users checked it out. Maybe someone should have mentioned going to third party apps in their tirades against Win 8.x on all the IT media.
The idea that you can change to a third party app if you don't like the base app is why lots of us use Firefox or Chrome. So why not a menu app?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
