|
Reverse the text image and print with raised characters. Then some ink, a roller and you can print on blank paper of almost any type! 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, Gutenberg, how about 3D printing lots of separate letters and then assembling them in a wooden frame before printing. This way the letters can be reused many times.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
An even better idea! Well Done! 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
They misunderstood. A 3D printer is needed to print a document. A regular printer is needed to print the contents of a document. You got what you asked for. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, well spotted!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
maze3 wrote: Me: but I can't print a word document to that.
But you can take a screenshot of the document, and blend it to a 3D model of a helix.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
maze3 wrote: Me: but I can't print a word document to that.
You just need to make a flat and very, very thin 3D model.
|
|
|
|
|
The usual controversy reigns post the Oscars. A while back my 17 year old daughter wanted to go to the movies and suggested Bohemian Rhapsody even though she knew nothing about Queen. We went and both really enjoyed the film so I'm pretty happy Rami Malek got best actor. For the rest of it "I don't give a damn."
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
BoRap was good - and well worth watching, even if you don't know who Freddie was.
The Green Book is supposed to be pretty good as well (8.3 on IMDB is either damn good or a lot of paid shills) so I'm surprised that got anything at all.
But most Hollywood output is tired, trite, and formulaic, sadly.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But most Hollywood output is tired, trite, and formulaic, sadly.
Or extremely ideological lately. When I go to a movie, I don't want to be lectured. If I feel that I need a lecture, I watch real ones on youtube.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote: If I feel that I need a lecture, I watch real ones on youtube.
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it can become very entertaining. Not the lectures themselves, but the 'reactions' to them by idiots who want to tell an astrophysicist that the earth is flat and that they are wrong about absolutely everything.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Green Book
Dont you mean GreBo?
|
|
|
|
|
At least he didn't mean "BoRat" 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: The Green Book is supposed to be pretty good as well (8.3 on IMDB is either damn good or a lot of paid shills) so I'm surprised that got anything at all.
I liked it, and I've been generally despising most movies made over the last few years...
|
|
|
|
|
well if you hadn't posted this message I wouldn't know the oscars were on
... so thanks for the heads up, now I know why utube is recommending movie clips at me.
don't start me on the oscars: titanic...wtf!?!? brokenback mountain: please. luckily most other years I've forgotten. oh wait, shindilers list. ah ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ! ... forget! forget!
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
These, and the other "let's pat ourselves on the back" events are becoming every more useless.
Now that there must be an appropriate number of "women" and "people of color" amongst the winners, you cannot be sure who, if anyone, really earned it.
On the other hand - since they're awarding themselves, does it matter? Not so long as the right people where the right extremely revealing clothing for the event.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: "let's pat ourselves on the back" events are becoming every more useless.
Frak!
(Nerds, tell me where that first came from, others avert your eyes.)
I was hoping that we could one day throw an expensive party and pat each other on the backs for our articles here. Then I might actually write some, just to be invited.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by the list of those frequenting the CP, the most important part (per my link) would be sorely lacking. At which point, what's the point?
I just don't have the desire (or stomach) to check out Linus Torvalds going topless.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
What? Linus is going to come to the party? You just are not the party type, huh? The whole idea is to go as far as you can while still desperately trying not to become the scandal of the night. All expect it, all come to see it, but nobody wants the part. Still, I think we have some people here who we can count on.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Now that there must be an appropriate number of "women" and "people of color" amongst the winners, you cannot be sure who, if anyone, really earned it.
Filling a quota rather than rewarding those who deserve it devalues all awards.
If all the best people in all categories happen to all be women and people of color, then I have no problem giving them all the Oscars. They just have to expect the same when the opposite is also true. There's the incentive for everyone to make something exceptional.
|
|
|
|
|
All they needed, not that long ago, was a loud whine from the (supposedly) underrepresented - and they even said they 'need to fix the problem'.
Well - if 95% of the directors are white males, I'd expect a 95% chance that the best director would be a white male. Maybe a bit less - those who don't fit the mold are very possibly a bit better to even get where they are (assuming it, too, wasn't another quota!).
And I understand the reality . . . I see old movies from the 1930's and 1940's. Everyone seems to be, basically, a WASP. By the 40's, it seems Jews were allowed to use their real name as producers, composers, and the like - but not actually be in even a minor acting roll. Black? Occasionally allowed to act in humiliating. Women? Blond heroines. Dark haired were either part of the evil group or exotic 'native' queens (white queen of black tribe). If you've never done so, look up "Edgar G. Robinson"'s real name.
So - there are problems - but like everything else - you can admit them and eliminate obstacles. That's fair to all - let the best be the best. All will benefit. As soon as there's special treatment then merit is suspect (warranted or not). That results in a great roar, most akin to a flushing sound.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
It reminded me of when Justin Trudeau (still today Canada's PM) just got elected and, when asked why his cabinet would be made up of 50% women and minorities, his response was "because it's 2015". Which was met with thunderous applause. Oh, so progressive, Justin.
My follow-up question has always been, if all the best qualified candidates for those jobs were all women and minorities, then he'd be discriminating against them because he apparently still wanted the remaining 50% to be represented by some other group(s). In other words, he's prioritized quotas rather than finding the best people for the job. When you're hiring for the top-level jobs in government, shouldn't you be looking at qualifications first, regardless of gender/skin color/whatever else? Heck, when interviewing candidates, we're not allowed to ask about anything that could be used to discriminate against any particular group. Yet this is exactly what he did (and was so proud of it).
With logic like that, he sure lost no time to demonstrate how he was not qualified for the job.
(Soapbox material? I'm discussing policies, not politics)
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: When you're hiring for the top-level jobs in government, shouldn't you be looking at qualifications first, regardless of gender/skin color/whatever else?
Here, I profoundly disagree.
The best qualified should be picked out amongst all candidates for any job. The person who doesn't get a job because room was made for a special pick? That person feels as hungry and desperate and anyone else. What did they do that they should be punished. The answer is, of course, the same as was used to discrimiate against the "others": they were born with the wrong gender/skin/religion/accent/.....
When affirmative action first came out - for that ONE GENERATION - it was, alas, sensible. Opportunity to compete was stolen from them. Now? Opportunities their but quotas are easier. So let the "other people" study and get the job because your particular group remains under-represented. F^ck that! A very good say: "You've made your bed, now lie in it."
Ultimately, it is in the interest of 'racists' to have racial quotas - as it keeps the fires of hate well stoked.
There is one and only one way to end discrimination. Don't F***ing Discriminate!
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Here, I profoundly disagree.
The best qualified should be picked out amongst all candidates for any job.
Well, I've probably expressed this poorly then. I certainly agree 100% with that.
W∴ Balboos wrote: There is one and only one way to end discrimination. Don't F***ing Discriminate!
That was pretty much my point about my Trudeau reference. That is discrimination.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
