Comments by TheRorooo (Top 5 by date)

Thanks for the suggestion. Including an empty string in Choices threw an error, but including a space seems to actually work. I am not very familiar with the BabbleTimeout property although I tried messing with I earlier. If I understand correctly that's the time the recognizer waits after it doesn't hear anything before it finishes recognition. Does a zero value make it wait infinitely in this case? But still maybe for my push to talk usage the approach, I suggested earlier might be better because this way the speech recognizer doesn't stop when I make a break when naming those things. Thanks either way.

Works pretty well so far. The only thing that would be useful in some situations for me and can't find a way to do it so far is having an instruction followed by naming some amount of specified phrases that could be from one to all of them. I could probably append the same options multiple times, but then the recognition doesn't stop. As I plan to use push to talk for this project anyway maybe I could have it just take the current hypothesized speech after releasing the button. This approach would probably also enable me to have optional phrases at the end of the instruction. If you have any better ideas, please let me know.

Okay, I think I got what you meant. Didn't know you could use a whole GrammarBuilder inside of Choices! This looks very promising from some initial testing :) Thank you very much.

Thank you for your reply. Maybe I didn't explain myself well. I am currently using a combination of Choices and .Append as you suggest. My problem is that let's say I have .Apppend 3 times and I want a fourth or even fifth optional one. It would also be the best for me to change the order of the next appends based on the phrase recognized from the first one as I currently would need to include the phrases in both. I also don't think this is really a tree structure as once you branch to one phrase you still have an option for all the same phrases in the next append which ideally you shouldn't. Or actually reading you comment one more time, do you mean you can include a whole grammar builder as one of the choices and try to make a tree-like structure that way?