Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

Beating the Daylight Savings Time bug and getting correct file modification times

, 28 May 2001
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
Windows reports erroneous file modification times, which change according to daylight savings. This article describes why this is so and how to determine correct file modification times and avoid the DST bug.


Not many Windows developers seem aware of it, but Microsoft deliberately designed Windows NT to report incorrect file creation, modification, and access times. This decision is documented in the Knowledge Base in articles Q128126 and Q158588. For most purposes, this behavior is innocuous, but as Microsoft writes in Q158588,

After the automatic correction for Daylight Savings Time, monitoring programs comparing current time/date stamps to reference data that were not written using Win32 API calls which directly obtain/adjust to Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) will erroneously report time/date changes on files. Programs affected by this issue may include version-control software, database-synchronization software, software-distribution packages, backup software ....

This behavior is responsible for a flood of questions to the various support lists for CVS, following the first Sunday in April and the last Sunday in October, with scores of people complaining that CVS now reports erroneously that their files have been modified. This is commonly known as the "red file bug" because the WinCVS shell uses red icons to indicate modified files.

Over the past two years, several people have made concerted efforts to fix this bug and determine the correct file modification times for files both on NTFS and FAT volumes. It has proved surprisingly difficult to solve this problem correctly. I believe that I have finally gotten everything right and would like to share my solution with anyone else who cares about this issue.

An Example of the Problem

The batch file listed belowFor example, run the following batch file on a computer where C: is an NTFS volume and A: is a FAT-formatted floppy disk. You will need write access to C:\ and A:\. This script will change your system time and date, so be prepared to manually restore them afterwards.

REM Test_DST_Bug.bat
REM File Modification Time Test
Date /T
Time /T
Date 10/27/2001
Time 10:00 AM
Echo Foo > A:\Foo.txt
Time 10:30 AM
Echo Foo > C:\Bar.txt
dir a:\Foo.txt c:\Bar.txt
Date 10/28/2001
dir a:\Foo.txt c:\Bar.txt
REM Prompt the user to reset the date and time.

The result looks something like this (abridged to save space)

C:\>Date 10/27/2001
C:\>dir a:\Foo.txt c:\Bar.txt

  Directory of a:\
10/27/01  10:00a                     6 foo.txt
  Directory of c:\
10/27/01  <font color=red>10:30a</font>                     6 Bar.txt

C:\>Date 10/28/2001
C:\>dir a:\Foo.txt c:\Bar.txt

  Directory of a:\
10/27/01  10:00a                     6 foo.txt
  Directory of c:\
10/27/01  <font color=red>09:30a</font>                     6 Bar.txt

On 27 October, Windows correctly reports that Bar.txt was modified half an hour after Foo.txt, but the next day, Windows has changed its mind and decided that actually, Bar.txt was modified half an hour before Foo.txt. A näive programmer might think this was a bug, but as Microsoft emphasized, this is how they want Windows to behave.

Solution to the problem

Having spent a lot of time thinking about this problem, I wanted to share the information with people who want to get to the bottom of it, but I realize that most readers here will just want to grab my solutions and use them. Thus, I am putting the instructions here for using the solution.

The library I supply contains one exported function: BOOL GetUTCFileModTime ( LPCTSTR name, time_t * utc_mod_time ). Just pass this function a filename (it can be a fully qualified path or just a file name in the current directory). The function will return TRUE for success, FALSE for failure, and will store the UTC file modification time in * utc_mod_time. Link with the JmgStat.lib library and you're off and running. Oh, yes. I have wrapped the library in the namespace Jonathan_M_Gilligan_95724E90_4A88_11d5_80F3_006008C7B14D. Someone else might have a function called GetUTCFileModTime() and I don't want to collide with it, so I have concatenated my initials with a GUID to produce a unique, but recognizable namespace. Rather than typeing such a long string for every invocation of the function, you may want to assign a namespace alias, namespace jmg = Jonathan_M_Gilligan_95724E90_4A88_11d5_80F3_006008C7B14D; and then you can call jmg::GetUTCFileModTime(); Example:

namespace jmg = Jonathan_M_Gilligan_95724E90_4A88_11d5_80F3_006008C7B14D;

time_t mod_time_1, mod_time_2;
if ( jmg::GetUTCFileModTime( _T("foo.txt"), & mod_time_1 ) 
        && jmg::GetUTCFileModTime( _T("bar.txt"), & mod_time_2 )  )
    if (mod_time_1 > mod_time_2)
        _tprintf( _T("foo is older.\n") );

Why Windows has this problem

The origin of this file-name problem lies in the early days of MS-DOS and PC-DOS. Unix and other operating systems designed for continuous use and network communications have long tended to store times in GMT (later UTC) format so computers in different time zones can accurately determine the order of different events. However, when Microsoft adapted DOS for the IBM PC, the personal computer was not envisioned in the context of wide-area networks, where it would be important to compare the modification times of files on the PC with those on another computer in another time zone.

In the interest of efficiently using the very limited resources of the computer, Microsoft wisely decided not to waste bits or processor cycles worrying about time zones. To put this decision in context, recall that the first two generations of PCs did not have battery-backed real-time clocks, so you would generally put DATE and TIME commands into your AUTOEXEC.BAT file to prompt you to enter the date and time manually when the computer booted.

Digression on systems of measuring time...

By the time of WinNT, wide-area networks and had become sufficiently common that Microsoft realized that the OS should measure time in some universal format that would allow different computers to compare the order (and separation) of events irrespective of their particular time zones. Although the details vary (different time structures measure time relative to different events), the net effect is that all times used internally in Win32 measure time with respect to UTC (what used to be called GMT).

Having once worked down the hall from the master atomic clock array for the United States at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, I feel obligated to add a few words about time and systems for reporting time. Long ago, we used to refer time to GMT, or Greenwich Mean Time, which was kept by the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, England and was ultimately referred to the position of the sun as measured by the observatory. When atomic clocks became the standard for timekeeping, a new standard, called UTC emerged. UTC is a bastard acronym. In English, it stands for "Coordinated Universal Time," while in French it stands for "le temps universel coordonné." Rather than using either CUT or TUC, the nonsense compromise acronym UTC was adopted.

To understand UTC, we must first understand the more abstract International Atomic Time (TAI, le temps atomique international), which measures the number of seconds that have elapsed since approximately 1 Jan 1958, as measured by caesium atomic clocks. The second is defined to be the amount of time required for 9 192 631 770 cycles of the caesium hyperfine frequency. However, neither the day nor the year are exact multiples of this number, so we take TAI and correct it so that it corresponds to the actual motion of the earth by adding corrections such as "leap seconds." TAI measures raw atomic time. UTC measures time coordinated to the motion of the earth (i.e., so we don't end up having midnight while the sun is shining or January in midsummer). Details of what UTC really means, together with a more detailed history of timekeeping, can be found at

UTC, time zones, and Windows file times

So what does this all have to do with file modification times on Windows computers? Windows is stuck with some serious problems integrating FAT and NTFS files compatibly. FAT records file modification times with respect to the local time zone, while NTFS records file modification (as well as creation and access times, which FAT does not record) in UTC. The first question you may want to ask is, "How should Windows report these file times?" Clearly it would be stupid for dir and Windows Explorer to report FAT file times in the local time zone and NTFS file times in UTC. If inconsistent formats were used, users would have great difficulty determining which of two files was more recent. We must thus choose to translate one of the two file time formats when we report to the user. Most users are likely to want to know the file modification time in their local time zone. This keeps things consistent with what people learned to expect under DOS and Win16. It also is more useful to most users, who may want to know how long ago they modified a file without looking up the offset of their local time zone from UTC.

It is straightforward to translate UTC to local time. You look up the offset, in minutes, between the local time zone and UTC, determine whether daylight savings is in effect and add either the standard or the daylight offset to the UTC time. However, daylight time throws a subtle wrench in the works if we try to go backwards...

The problem with daylight time

If you want to translate a time in your local time zone into UTC, it seems a straightforward matter of determining whether daylight time is in effect locally and then subtracting either the standard or the daylight offset from the local time to arrive at UTC. A subtle problem emerges due to the fact that the mapping from UTC to local time is not one-to-one. Specifically, when we leave daylight savings time and set our clocks back, there are two distinct hour-long intervals of UTC time that map onto the same hour-long interval of local time. Consider the concrete case of 1:30 AM on the last Sunday in October. Let's suppose the local time zone is US Central Time (-6 hours offset from UTC when daylight time is not in effect, -5 hours when it is). At 06:00 UTC on Sunday 28 October 2001, the time in the US Central zone will be 01:00 (1:00 AM) and daylight time will be in effect. At 06:30 UTC, it will be 01:30 local. At 07:00 UTC, it will be 01:00:00 local and daylight time will not be in effect. At 07:30 UTC, it will be 01:30 local. Thus, for all times 01:00 ≤ t < 02:00 local, there will be two distinct UTC times that correspond to the given local time. This degenerate mapping means that we can't be sure which UTC time corresponds to 01:30 local time. If a FAT file is marked as having been modified at 01:30 on 28 Oct. 2001, we can't determine the UTC time.

When translating local file times to UTC and vice-versa, Microsoft made a strange decision. We would like to have the following code procduce out_time equal to in_time

FILETIME in_time, local_time, out_time;

//  assign in_time, then do this...

FileTimeToLocalFileTime(& in_time, & local_time);
LocalFileTimeToFileTime(& local_time, & out_time);

The problem is that if the local time zone is US Central (UTC - 6 hours for standard time, UTC - 5 hours for daylight time) then in_time = 06:30:00 Oct 28 2001 and in_time = 07:30:00 Oct 28 2001 both map onto the same local time, 01:30:00 Oct 28 2001 and we don't know which branch to choose when we execute LocalFileTimeToFileTime(). Microsoft picked an incorrect, but unambiguously invertable algorithm: move all times up an hour when daylight time is in effect on the local computer, irrespective of the DST state of the time being converted. Thus, if DST is in effect on my local computer, FileTimeToLocalFileTime converts 06:30:00 Oct 28 2001 UTC to 01:30:00 CDT and 07:30:00 Oct 28 2001 UTC to 02:30:00 CDT. If I call the same function with the same arguments, but when DST is not in effect on my local computer, FileTimeToLocalFileTime will convert 06:30:00 UTC to 00:30:00 CDT and 07:30:00 UTC to 01:30:00 CDT.

It may seem strange that this would affect the C library call stat, which allegedly returns the UTC modification time of a file. If you examine the source code for Microsoft's C library, you find that it gets the modification time thus:

// pseudocode listing
WIN32_FIND_DATA find_buf;
FILETIME local_ft;
time_t mod_time;

// FindFirstFile returns times in UTC.
// For NTFS files, it just returns the modification time
// stored on the disk.
// For FAT files, it converts the modification time from 
// local (which is stored on the disk) to UTC using
// LocalFileTimeToFileTime()
hFile = FindFirstFile ( file_name, &find_buf );

// convert UTC mod time to local...
FileTimeToLocalFileTime ( &find_buf.ftLastWriteTime, &local_ft );

// Now use a private, undocumented function to convert local time to UTC
// time according to the DST settings appropriate to the time being
// converted!
mod_time = __secret_microsoft_converter(local_ft);

For a FAT file, the conversions work like this:

  1. raw file modification is converted to UTC by LocalFileTimeToFileTime()
  2. UTC converted back to local by FileTimeToLocalFileTime(). Note that this exactly reverses the effect of step 1, so we are left with the correct local modification time.
  3. local time converted to "correct" UTC by private function

For an NTFS file, the conversions work like this:

  1. raw file modification is already in UTC, so we don't need to convert it.
  2. UTC converted to local by FileTimeToLocalFileTime(). This applies a DST correction according to the DST setting of the computer's system time, irrespective of the DST setting at the file modification time.
  3. local time converted to "correct" UTC by private function. Note that this does not reverse the effect of step 2 because in step 3, we use the DST setting for the file modification time, not the system time.

This explains the problem I showed at the top of this article: The time reported by dir for a file on an NTFS volume changes by an hour as we move into or out of daylight savings time, despite the fact that I haven't touched the file. FAT modification times are stable across DST.

Categorizing the problem

There are 3 possible ways I can think of where this inconsistency in reporting file times may cause problems:

  1. You may be comparing a file on an NTFS volume with a time_t value stored in a file (or memory). This is frequently seen in CVS and leads to the infamous "red-file" problem on the first Sunday of April and the last Sunday of October.
  2. You may be comparing a file on a FAT volume with a time_t value.
  3. You may be comparing a file on a FAT volume with a file on an NTFS volume.


  1. For case (1), it's simple. Get the file times using the Windows API call GetFileTime() instead of using the C library stat(), and convert the FILETIME to time_t by subtracting the origin (Jan 1 1600) and dividing by 10,000,000 to convert 100-nanosecond units to seconds.
  2. For case (2), stat() will work and return a time_t that you can compare to the stored one. If you must use GetFileTime() do not use LocalFileTimeToFileTime(). This function will apply the the daylight state of the current system time, not the daylight status of the file time in the argument. Fortunately, the C library mktime() function will correctly convert the time if you correctly set the tm_isdst field of the tm struct.

    There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem here. Windows does not supply a good API call to let you determine whether DST was in effect at a given time. Fortunately for residents of the US and other countries that use the same logic (Daylight time starts at 2:00 AM on the first Sunday of April and ends at 2:00 AM on the last Sunday in October), in which case you can set tm_isdst to a negative number and mktime() will automatically determine whether daylight time applies or not. If the file was modified in the window 1:00-2:00 am on the last Sunday in October, it's ambiguous how mktime() computes the modification time.

    People in time zones that do not follow the usual US daylight rule must brute-force the daylight time problem by retrieving the applicable TIMEZONEINFO structure with GetTimeZoneInformation and manually calculating whether daylight time applies.

  3. For case (3), the best bet is to follow the instructions for case 2 above and compare the resultant UTC time_t with the time for the NTFS file determined in case (1).
The library (available for download from the link at the top of this article implements this solution with checking for the filesystem the file is stored under.


This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here


About the Author

Jonathan Gilligan
Web Developer
United States United States
No Biography provided

Comments and Discussions

QuestionI'm either mad or stupid... PinmemberMikeBz30-May-14 1:52 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pinmembermatelich9-Nov-10 5:24 
GeneralAll file dates on C:\ change themselves 1 hour on each DST event! Pinmemberendeavorz16-Jan-10 7:17 
GeneralRe: All file dates on C:\ change themselves 1 hour on each DST event! Pinmemberendeavorz17-Jan-10 8:47 
Generalwindows 7 changed all Pinmemberumeca749-Dec-09 7:28 
GeneralRe: windows 7 changed all Pinmemberendeavorz16-Jan-10 7:08 
GeneralQ128126 and Q158588 not found PinmemberMandar D. Sahasrabuddhe2-Oct-09 23:51 
GeneralBugs PinmemberStewart Gordon15-Jan-09 0:44 
GeneralInvalid link for UTC PinmemberVoja Intermajstor4-Apr-06 23:13 
Generalconvert Timeval second to date format Pinmemberyessowmya17-Nov-04 3:01 
GeneralRe: convert Timeval second to date format PinmemberJonathan Gilligan17-Nov-04 4:41 
GeneralEliminate all time zone as well as DST. PinmemberForogar29-Nov-03 13:32 
GeneralRe: Eliminate all time zone as well as DST. PinmemberTroy Russell26-May-09 8:57 
GeneralDoesn't make sense PinmemberAnonymous8-Jul-02 12:06 
GeneralRe: Doesn't make sense PinmemberJonathan Gilligan8-Jul-02 16:01 
GeneralRe: Doesn't make sense Pinmemberpeterchen29-Mar-03 22:47 
GeneralRe: Doesn't make sense PinmemberFunkyMonkey18-Jan-06 17:17 
GeneralGPL ? :(( PinmemberGeorge10-Jun-01 10:27 
GeneralDynamic Disks PinmemberKennet Nielsen4-Jun-01 12:03 
GeneralRe: Dynamic Disks PinmemberJonathan Gilligan5-Jun-01 6:25 
QuestionTimeZones? PinmemberAlex30-May-01 12:42 
GeneralHyperfine spectrums PinmemberGiles Forster30-May-01 8:50 
GeneralRe: Hyperfine spectrums PinmemberJonathan Gilligan30-May-01 10:36 
GeneralSome thoughts ... Abolish DST! PinmemberClaudius Mokler30-May-01 0:39 
Thanks for this article, but :
Good things are timeless; so should programs be (really?).
It would be a godsend if this braindead "daylight savings" scheme would finally be abolished.
"daylight saving" is supposed to save energy, but the amount of energy (both real and virtual) spent on devising working schemes to cope with it is vastly higher than the originally "saved" amount.
Consider time tables, computers (ha!), constant re-setting of clocks and virtually everything else. (O.K., I live in europe and here we have something named DCF-77 which allows for really inexpensive radio-controlled clocks, but my great-grandfathers pocket watch, which I'm still using (it's now close to a hundred years old, but runs perfectly and is only about one minute per week off) also needs re-setting).
Besides, in our modern world the concept of "everyone works 9-5" has since long lost it's value.
Oh, would this be a brighter and nicer world, where decisions were based on thought and knowledge ...

Microsoft's implementation of their time (mis-)handling functions is also rather nasty; I had a long and not very successful fight with them. Some inept and mentally retarded apes are to be found nearly everywhere; I'm not astonished about some of them working for Microsoft.
There is but one time, GMT.
GeneralRe: Some thoughts ... Abolish DST! PinmemberAnonymous30-May-01 1:22 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

| Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.140827.1 | Last Updated 29 May 2001
Article Copyright 2001 by Jonathan Gilligan
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid