Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

Introduction to Managed C++

, 7 Jul 2002
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
An attempt to get a beginner started on Managed C++


This is intended as a jump-start tutorial for Managed C++ programming. It does not cover every aspect of the managed extensions, but it does cover certain areas that are often puzzling to someone coming from a C# or a native C++ background. The article assumes that the reader is familiar with the basic elements of .NET technology and that the user can understand C++ code when he or she sees it.

Simple program

#using <mscorlib.dll>

using namespace System;

int _tmain(void)
    return 0;

#using is a preprocessor directive that imports meta data from a .NET module or library. In our small program we have used #using on mscorlib.dll which is an essential library for all .NET programs. Just using #using gives us access to all the namespaces and classes in that module or library. But we'd have to type the fully qualified name for each class we use, including the namespace or namespaces if any. We can use the using namespace directive which will allow us to use class names without having to use the namespace-name explicitly.

For example I can write this :-

System::Console::WriteLine("Hello Earth");

But if I have used a using namespace directive, then I can use :-

using namespace System;
Console::WriteLine("Hello Earth");

It's mostly a matter of readability. Some people might prefer to use fully qualified names to improve the clarity of their code. And sometimes you are forced to, as when two namespaces have classes with the same names in which case the compiler gets confused.

Managed classes

A managed class is a class that is garbage collected, means you don't have to delete it after using it. All that's managed for you by the common language runtime. In MC++ we create managed classes using the __gc keyword as shown below.

__gc class First
        m_name = "Anonymous";
    First(String* s)
        m_name = s;
    String* GetName()
        return m_name;
    void SetName(String* s)
        m_name = s;
    String* m_name;

Well, it looks more or less like a normal C++ class except that we have used the __gc keyword when declaring it. That marks it as managed. You'll also notice how I have used String* instead of String. This is because the String class is a managed class that can only be declared on the heap.

First* f1 = new First();
First* f2 = new First("Andrew");

Using the managed class is not dissimilar from using a normal old-style C++ class. Except that I cannot declare objects of type First, I have to declare them on the heap using First* and new. As you might observe, I have not called delete. Hey, don't look at me with that sort of gleam in your eyes as if to tell me that I should not be so careless. I didn't call delete because it's not required that I do so. This is Managed C++ we are talking about, remember. And because First is a managed class, the common language runtime will automatically delete the objects that are no longer under use, using it's garbage collector. Very handy, I say very handy!

Using properties

Take a look at the two listings below :-

//Listing A
//Listing B
f2->Name = "Colin";

Obviously the second listing is more readable. Of course using a public member variable would be a very impetuous idea and one that would result in a lot of scornful looks from most programmers. But in .NET we have properties, in fact I have some rather vague ideas that the native C++ compiler supports properties too, but since the vagueness is rather strong, I better keep quiet about that one.

__gc class First


    __property String* get_Name()
        return m_name;
    __property void set_Name(String* s)
        m_name = s;



If you have only a get_ function then your property is read-only. If you have only the set_ function you have a write-only property. And in our case, since we have both get_ and set_ functions, we have a read-and-write property. The get_ function's return type must be same as the set_ function's argument. MSDN adds that you cannot define a property that has the same name as the containing class.


Consider the function below :-

void Show(Object* o)

Rather neat, eh? It takes an object of type Object and displays it on the console. Now see this snippet of code.

String* s1 = "Hello World";

Compiles and works fine. Now see the following snippet of code.

int i = 100;
Show(i); //This won't compile

Blast! That won't even compile. You'll get compiler error C2664: 'Show' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'int' to 'System::Object __gc *'. This is where we need to use the __box keyword.

int i = 100;

What __box does is simple. It creates a new managed object on the heap and copies the value type object into the managed object. And it returns the managed object which is actually a copy of the original value type object. This means that if you modify the managed object returned by an __box, the original object won't change at all.


Obviously if you can box, you should be able to unbox too, eh? Let's say we want to box a value object to an Object and then unbox it back to a value object. The following code snippet shows you how to accomplish this chore.

Object* o1 = __box(i);
int j = *static_cast<__box int*>(o1);
j *= 3;

Good heavens! That turned out to be rather more sinister looking than you had expected I bet. What we do is to cast the managed object to the __gc pointer on the CLR heap and then we simply dereference it. You can use dynamic_cast instead of static_cast for increased type-safety.

Native code blocks

Consider the following function.

void NativeCall()
    puts("This is printed from a native function");

As you can see, it uses purely normal non-.NET stuff. Obviously we can improve execution speed if we can compile this function as native. MC++ provides us with the #pragma managed and #pragma unmanaged preprocessor directives. We simply add a #pragma unmanaged just before the function and then add a #pragma managed just after the function.

#pragma unmanaged

void NativeCall()

#pragma managed

Now when this function is encountered during program execution, the common language runtime will pass on control to the native platform. Obviously we must use this whenever we have functions that use fully unmanaged functions. What's real neat is that we call call unmanaged functions that are marked as #pragma unmanaged from within managed blocks of code.

__value classes

Earlier I had said that managed classes cannot be allocated on the stack. Sometimes, we might have the requirement for a very simple class, often merely for storing some values. In such cases it might be desirable to have a value type class that can be allocated on the stack. That's where the __value keyword comes in. The following code snippet shows you how to declare a value type class.

__value class Second
    void Abc()

Now we can declare objects of type Second on the stack.

Second sec;

In fact we can even declare them on the heap. But remember this won't be the CLR managed heap and thus we need to delete our objects on our own.

Second* psec = __nogc new Second();
delete psec;

More reading


This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below.

A list of licenses authors might use can be found here


About the Author

Nish Nishant

United States United States
Nish is a real nice guy who has been writing code since 1990 when he first got his hands on an 8088 with 640 KB RAM. Originally from sunny Trivandrum in India, he has been living in various places over the past few years and often thinks it’s time he settled down somewhere.
Nish has been a Microsoft Visual C++ MVP since October, 2002 - awfully nice of Microsoft, he thinks. He maintains an MVP tips and tricks web site - where you can find a consolidated list of his articles, writings and ideas on VC++, MFC, .NET and C++/CLI. Oh, and you might want to check out his blog on C++/CLI, MFC, .NET and a lot of other stuff -
Nish loves reading Science Fiction, P G Wodehouse and Agatha Christie, and also fancies himself to be a decent writer of sorts. He has authored a romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket as well as a programming book – Extending MFC applications with the .NET Framework.
Nish's latest book C++/CLI in Action published by Manning Publications is now available for purchase. You can read more about the book on his blog.
Despite his wife's attempts to get him into cooking, his best effort so far has been a badly done omelette. Some day, he hopes to be a good cook, and to cook a tasty dinner for his wife.

Comments and Discussions

QuestionWhy slowdown operation!? Pinmembermurti3866-Feb-07 8:19 
GeneralManaging MFC PinmemberMohitJn8-Mar-04 23:00 
This is my first shot at .Net (2002), and here is what I landed into:
Objective: To create a Managed VC++.Net Doc/View App
This is how I tried:
1. Created a SDI App using AppWizard.
2. Modifed the Project Settings to include /CLR, and removed conflicting settings as /RTCxx etc.
3. Added a new generic class to my project and decorated it with __gc
Result: Successful compilation
Problem: The generic classes that I make can be managed and function which dont use managed code can be demarcated by #pragma unmanaged... No problem till this stage, but I want to understand is that, if i have a generic class and its not managed, then how do i go about demarcating it i.e. should i enclose my entire class in the #prgama, or jst not writing __gc will do teh magic. Also, the MFC classes as CDocument and CDialog are all unmanaged, but how does the compiler know that they are unmanaged? What is the recommended way to mix managed and unmanaged classes, and is there any way to make MFC "managable"
Too confused with .Net to think of a signature
GeneralPlatform SDK with Unmanaged interface PinmemberPawanKishore20-Feb-04 21:09 
GeneralManaged C++ classes Pinmemberricky_casson9-Jan-04 13:37 
GeneralCreating objects of unmanaged C++ in managed C++ Pinmembermoist10-Aug-03 21:16 
GeneralRe: Creating objects of unmanaged C++ in managed C++ PineditorNishant S11-Aug-03 7:59 
GeneralRe: Creating objects of unmanaged C++ in managed C++ Pinmembermoist11-Aug-03 15:48 
GeneralRe: Creating objects of unmanaged C++ in managed C++ PineditorNishant S11-Aug-03 16:32 
QuestionWhat about C using Unmanaged C Static Libraries ? PinsussAnonymous26-May-03 2:37 
Generalusing Hashtable in MC++ Pinmemberharanath25-Apr-03 6:58 
GeneralRe: using Hashtable in MC++ PinmemberNemanja Trifunovic25-Apr-03 7:13 
GeneralRe: using Hashtable in MC++ Pinmemberharanath27-Apr-03 22:57 
GeneralRe: using Hashtable in MC++ PinmemberMarkTheShark17-Feb-05 13:42 
GeneralHello, Nishant PinmemberAnthony_Yio10-Dec-02 17:52 
GeneralRe: Hello, Nishant PineditorNishant S26-Dec-02 11:26 
GeneralBrilliant Style PinmemberYusuf Jiruwala9-Dec-02 9:23 
GeneralRe: Brilliant Style PineditorNishant S26-Dec-02 11:25 
GeneralThanks Nish PineditorPaul Watson23-Jul-02 6:29 
GeneralRe: Thanks Nish PinsubeditorNishant S23-Jul-02 7:33 
QuestionHow slow is it? PinmemberMiguel Lopes9-Jul-02 9:21 
AnswerRe: How slow is it? PinsubeditorNishant S9-Jul-02 10:06 
GeneralRe: How slow is it? Pinmemberpankajdaga12-Jul-02 1:25 
GeneralRe: How slow is it? PinsubeditorNishant S13-Jul-02 1:41 
AnswerRe: How slow is it? PinmemberNemanja Trifunovic23-Jul-02 7:09 
GeneralRe: How slow is it? PinsubeditorNishant S23-Jul-02 7:37 
Generalsdrs PinmemberAnonymous21-Oct-01 23:38 
GeneralRe: sdrs PinmemberMatt Newman9-Mar-02 16:39 
GeneralEffort PinmemberNemesh Kaur19-Oct-01 1:33 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberMN19-Oct-01 6:53 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberMatt Newman9-Mar-02 16:41 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberJames T. Johnson9-Mar-02 16:50 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsubeditorNishant S8-Jul-02 13:28 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsubeditorNishant S8-Jul-02 13:29 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberMatt Newman8-Jul-02 17:11 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberDean 'Karnatos' Michaud9-Jul-02 9:43 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsubeditorNishant S9-Jul-02 10:00 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberRama Krishna15-Jul-02 9:47 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsubeditorNishant S15-Jul-02 14:56 
GeneralRe: Effort PinmemberRenGirion15-Jul-02 9:34 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsubeditorNishant S15-Jul-02 14:58 
GeneralRe: Effort Pinmembersuchan23-Jul-02 6:49 
General!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PinsubeditorNishant S23-Jul-02 7:35 
GeneralRe: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PinmemberKapil M4-Feb-03 8:17 
GeneralRe: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PineditorNishant S7-Feb-03 20:29 
GeneralRe: Effort PinsussJoe H7-Feb-03 9:32 
GeneralRe: Effort PineditorNishant S7-Feb-03 20:32 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

| Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Use | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.150326.1 | Last Updated 8 Jul 2002
Article Copyright 2001 by Nish Nishant
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2015
Layout: fixed | fluid