|
Ohhh... so that's what you meant by "the site wouldn't display all code", I had assumed you meant some site you were working on.
Try escaping the < with < (which is what the "Auto-encode HTML when pasting?" does.
|
|
|
|
|
Megidolaon wrote: It's quick & dirty but it does it's job and for a single line of XML I think it's ok.
That's what I thought until I was passed some text with values that needed to be encoded.
Like < and & and even a Ctrl-C 
I have since worked up a class to make it easier and hide the details.
|
|
|
|
|
Anything to do with XML is a coding horror 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
XmlDocument xmlDocument = new XmlDocument();
xmlDocument.AppendChild = xmlDocument.CreateElement("evil");
;o)
(yes|no|maybe)*
|
|
|
|
|
That's evil 
Seriously, that is okay, I've seen worse
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Megidolaon wrote:
<big>string</big> <small>XMLCommand = "<<Command Name=\"DoStuff\" ID=\""</small><big>;</big>
<small>XMLCommand</small> <big>+=</big> <small>ID.ToString()</small><big>;</big>
<small>XMLCommand</small> <big>+=</big> <small>"\"/>"</small><big>;</big>
My eyes! The goggles do nothing!
-Spacix
All your skynet questions[ ^] belong to solved
I dislike the black-and-white voting system on questions/answers. 
|
|
|
|
|
Why should it qualify as a horror? Admittedly, the use of strings in that fashion is not terribly efficient, but since they're small and the number of operations is comparatively modest I wouldn't consider the inefficiency particularly objectionable if the code isn't executed too often (if 90% of the time is spent in 10% of the code, it wouldn't matter much if the other 90% of the code were twice as slow as it should be).
My own preference, especially if more parts were being assembled into the string, would be to either use something like a StringBuilder so as to avoid repeated allocations for the different partially-assembled strings, but I don't see anything particularly wrong with the code as given, or else (if using C++ or C#, as opposed to VB) spread one statement over multiple lines. The strings in the above example are short enough that using a simple string type is probably fine, though, and spreading statements over multiple lines isn't particularly aesthetically pleasing.
|
|
|
|
|
I need to read a file from the bottom is it possible in c language ?
The exact requirement is
suppose having a file like
========================================
hi
how are you
exit 1
then
you
exit 1
and i can
make this
exit 0
===========================================
I need to read the file from bottom to search the last exit 1
and print the lines above it
the output will be
then
you
Can anybody help me ??
vineesh
|
|
|
|
|
Yep that's a coding horror.
And by the way of course you can do that in C - try poking around in stdio.h and reading a book or two. Maybe use Google.
I am convinced that lobotomising users will make little to no difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Thats a very special kind of humour. 
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
R.
T.
F.
M.
I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days 
|
|
|
|
|
No, you have it wrong. He said he needed to read the file from the bottom:
M.
F.
T.
R.
Mostly, when you see programmers, they aren't doing anything. One of the attractive things about programmers is that you cannot tell whether or not they are working simply by looking at them. Very often they're sitting there seemingly drinking coffee and gossiping, or just staring into space. What the programmer is trying to do is get a handle on all the individual and unrelated ideas that are scampering around in his head. (Charles M Strauss)
|
|
|
|
|
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "stdio.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "string.h"
#define MEANINGFULL_SIZE 256
#define DELIM "\nexit 1\n"
#define FILE_DATA "hi\nhow are you\nexit 1\nthen\nyou\nexit 1\nand i can\nmake this\nexit 0\n"
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
char* filestr = (char*)malloc(MEANINGFULL_SIZE);
char* Found = (char*)malloc(MEANINGFULL_SIZE);
char* Current = {0};
memcpy(filestr,FILE_DATA,MEANINGFULL_SIZE-1); //pseudo readfile
Current = strstr(filestr,DELIM); //Find Stuff
memcpy(Found,Current+strlen(DELIM),strlen(Current));//copy what ever was found minus the delims
Current = strstr(Found,DELIM);//find the next delims
*Current = '\0'; //truncate the string
printf("%s \n",Found);//publish the result
while(1);
return 0;
}
Hope this helps u 
modified on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 5:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
evil
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Standard header files should be included withh < and >.
eg. #include <stdio.h>.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Doesnt that just change the search scope for the file included? which will have little effect if it is increased scope maybe u wil lose 0.00000000001n.S in compile time. (realising that 85% of stats are made up on the spot)
if it does have some esoteric effect that i have been lucky enough to avoid thus far please educate me.
|
|
|
|
|
First off, it's good style. Secondly it effects the search paths used.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
killabyte wrote: char* filestr = (char*)malloc(MEANINGFULL_SIZE);
Shouldn't soemthing be freed somewhere ?
|
|
|
|
|
yes in a perfect world
modified on Friday, July 11, 2008 9:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
vineeshV wrote: Can anybody help me ?
Sure....how about picking the correct forum 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
At the risk of sounding stupid, why don't you do it two phases:
1. Read the file into a datatable, adding an additional column to represent a line number
2. Sort the table by line number (desc) and loop through.
Edward
Edward Steward
edwardsteward@optusnet.com.au
|
|
|
|
|
Just read the file into an array of lines, and loop backwards to the first occurrence of the delimiter (exit 1), keep track of the index you found and go from there.
Dybs
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
