|
|
This column would open a dialogbox when clicked
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can try adding image column from Columns->(Collection Properties)
and on the event of the datagrid click if the clicked column is the image column then you can can call a dialouge box to display.
|
|
|
|
|
What .NET reporting frameworks have you used and liked?
Most people do not like reports but we all know the business world needs them.
I have used ActiveReports for a little while now and noticed a steady decline in their release schedule.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SQL Server Reporting Services.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm responsible for a project involving development of a client-server application which requires two types of messaging between the client and the server:
1. Reliable message delivery to and from the server
2. Low latency, high volume data feed from the server to clients
With #1, I have found that MSMQ works pretty well for our needs within our network. However, I'm concerned that MSMQ doesn't work well over an untrusted network and therefore I am thinking of switching to using .NET remoting, as I believe that it is possible to encrypt the traffic and operate over untrusted networks such as the Internet.
#2 poses a much bigger problem. My experiments with .NET remoting have shown me that the application gets saturated very quickly. Using remote events and delegates, the client app simply can't keep up with the server and performance suffers to the point of being unusable. I'm a bit out of my depth on multithreading but I've seen MFC apps using sockets that don't need complex threading models to accomplish this so I'm not sure that multithreading is required here.
My questions are:
- For #1, I'd appreciate advice as to whether this sounds like a good idea and any pointers to how to encrypt the traffic.
- For #2, is there any example code that anyone can point me at which uses the .NET framework to get the performance I need, or ideas to help resolve this performance problem?
Any assistance and of course example code is welcomed!
|
|
|
|
|
You could take a look at either WCF, RabbitMQ, or NServiceBus, whatever is more appropriate for your scenario.
If you already have a working solution using MSMQ, then just make a secure tunnel - problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi-
I think this is pretty basic, but I'm not a coder...
I am using Visual Studio 2008 to create a web interface for an Access database. I can view, sort, edit my data in GridView but want to be able to have an expand/collapse feature. Not for a parent - child greidview. I just want to be able to see 5 records at a time and then when I click on the expand button be able to see all the records. Then when i hit collapse, I go back to only seeing 5 rows.
ANY advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you would get better suggestions/answers from Web Development[^] or ASP.NET[^] forum, depending on the technology you use.
Mika
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to Linux platform, i want to know that,
From where i can get Dot Net Framework for Linux platform ? and how i can run my dot net programs on to the Linux platform ?
please guide me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mono's not 100% complete, though.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
It's not feature complete, but it's the best bet for him at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Just now looking at the current roadmap, and it looks more complete than the last time I checked it out ( been a handful of years ago  )...
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
It will probably lack some core functions, like object.Equals() 
Last time I had to report that double.TryParse throws an exception. Somehow they couldnt understand that it should never throw an exception... thankfully that has been fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
I just fiddled around with it through an .iso file mounted on VMWare server. Didn't really go into depth, but I will when time permits 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Lakul,
You have to Installing Mono on Linux then .net framework will working fine.
Check installer, according to your requirement.See[^]
Pavan Pareta
|
|
|
|
|
Take a scenario that I have a HTML file located at some scratch area. whenever I run the regression the Html file is getting updated. I want to see the updated Html file every time I click the link on file name.
If I take sharepoint Document Library to upload the HTML file.
So the question is after clicking on file link, will I able to view updated file always? what extra setting I need to do? or do I have to make any customisation.
Shital Neralkar, Bangalore, India
|
|
|
|
|
Can I use a .Net 2.0 assembly in a .Net 3.5 app? I don't have source to the assembly in question, so a recompile is not possible.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Yes[^]
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you can. For example I use database providers which are written against 2.0 (from GAC).
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of the assemblies you use in .NET 3.5 apps were introduced in 2.0. They haven't been upgraded or changed because they worked fine then. As the newer versions of .NET are introduced as incremental upgrades, this use of old framework elements should continue to be fine for the forseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use version 1 libraries AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
