|
I can't confidently answer your question at all...
However here is what relevant info I found:
1st apparently to call .NET class from COM (or as COM component in your case) you need the mscorlib.tlb, as explained there
How to: Reference .NET Types from COM[^]
and a longer one
Calling a .NET Component from a COM Component[^]
I suspect these article might not help much or are nothing new for you, and you still wonder.. where is this damn mscorlib.tlb?
Well.. it's somewhere in the .NET framework folder:
Open
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET
And search for mscorlib.tlb, there are a few of them!
|
|
|
|
|
As a side note, can you talk about this project of yours?
Looks.. interesting?!
And you might consider loading .NET Core[^] instead of the normal framework?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Super Lloyd,
Yeah,...you understood essentially what I was getting at. The question is basically a COM question (since the .NET Framework classes, types, methods and attributes are 'exposed' to unmanaged applications through the associated COM interfaces).
The idea behind the application is to see how difficult it is to use the .NET Framework assembly types and methods from a MASM assembly language application. And, actually, I didn't come up with the original concept,...I'm just writing a test app to demonstrate that the code does in fact work correctly. I assume that it's not impossible, because you could do the same thing in C++, using Visual Studio.
The big problem with us assembly programmers is that we don't have all the header files that come with Visual Studio to rely on when we write our source, so we have to prototype everything from scratch (usually using the SDK header files, or files we can download from the Internet), and converting the syntax to that of an assembly language include file (the equivalent of a C or C++ header file), which is pretty simple.
And, yes,...you were right about the type library (mscorlib.tlb). You can launch the OLE/COM ObjectViewer (which I think is included with Visual Studio), and, scroll down to the type libraries. A COM type library is supposed to be registered for COM activation (similar to the registry entries for a COM Server Dll) and has entries in the registry, which indicate its location on your computer. So, I can open up the type library and view its various interfaces in IDL format. I assume that the type library was created with Tlbexp.exe (Type Library Exporter), and so the order of implementation addresses for the various functions in the selected interface virtual function table should be the same as in the .NET Framework assembly. This has been working pretty well so far. I can call the method of a COM interface that corresponds to its .NET class, and retrieve the data requested without any difficulty. But, I'm uncertain, at this point how to reference the various .NET Framework types that I will need to supply as calling parameters to corresponding COM Interface methods, so that I can actually call [COM Visible] .NET methods in my unmanaged application.
If you use an Intermediate Language decompiler, like ILSpy, you can open up mscorlib, and compare the actual .NET Framework class (for instance: Assembly Class), with its corresponding COM Interface for unmanaged applications: _Assembly, and get an idea for how they correspond.
modified 6-Jul-16 17:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Alright then.
It's really funny that you have an assembly question, while there was a very recent insider news about the rise of Assembly programming language!
What a timely coincidence!
|
|
|
|
|
Assembly language is interesting. You can do almost anything,...it's like cheating. But, for the novice assembly programmer (like me) it's very error-prone.
The biggest advantage is that it's extremely convenient to address anything in memory. This is why hackers prefer assembly language for their malicious code. Also, if you want total control over the precision of your data when implementing floating point calculations,...you'd want to write those procedures in assembly.
Years ago, when I first discovered IDA Pro, which is a 32-bit disassembler, I realized that I was going to have to learn to read assembly language so that I could understand the output of IDA. So, I got a text book on the subject (there is only one text book on MASM Assembly Programming), and used it as a reference,...but, it is almost totally obsolete. The Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer Manuals are by far the best source of information about the assembly language instruction sets.
|
|
|
|
|
While I got you in a chatty mood...
The last time I did assembly (yes, I did!) was around.. mmmm.. let me think... 1995?
When Windows 1995, somehow I lost the plot (I think I didn't know how to compile program which supported the then new protected mode or something like that...)..
I wonder, if I wanted to (briefly) play around with assembly today on Windows PC, what starting resource would you suggest?
In fact, now that I think of it, I compared compiled C to assembly and it was pretty close, that might be another reason I gave up....
Do you write your all program in assembly?
Or do you have asm block (or something like that) inside C functions?
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd,
So, are you the only one here ??? Nobody has a clue as to where the mscorlib header files might be hiding ??? Dang, .NET Framework programmers,...
I did find this blog about something similar: .Net Annoyances, 2004
The author says: "System.Object is defined in the mscorlib assembly. There is no mscorlib.h header file, and there is no mscorlib.idl to generate a C header file either. In order to get at this stuff I had to load up the binary type library file and export it as IDL."
The simplest way to get back into assembly language programming is downloading: The MASM32 SDK
modified 8-Jul-16 16:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm posting this just in case someone out there in the galaxy has a similar problem. 
As it turns out, I had the correct approach, but, I made a simple mistake (an incorrect assumption).
If you open the mscorlib Type Library in the OLE/COM Object Viewer, and select one of the COM interfaces, it will produce the IDL code of the interface virtual function table's implemented methods in the correct vtable order. I did this, for example, with the System.Reflection._Assembly interface that exposes the public members of the System.Reflection.Assembly class to unmanaged code. What I didn't notice was that the System.Reflection._Assembly interface was derived from IDispatch, instead of IUnknown, like I was assuming. IUnknown has three methods and IDispatch has four methods (in addition to IUnknown's three methods),...so, my count of the offset to the correct COM method implementation function pointer within the interface vtable was off by 4x4bytes. Embarrassing,...
...Just for some serious overkill, here is the IDL output of the System.Reflection._Assembly interface (from OLE/COM Object Viewer):
[
odl,
uuid(17156360-2F1A-384A-BC52-FDE93C215C5B),
version(1.0),
dual,
oleautomation,
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "System.Reflection.Assembly")
]
interface _Assembly : IDispatch {
[id(00000000), propget,
custom({54FC8F55-38DE-4703-9C4E-250351302B1C}, "1")]
HRESULT ToString([out, retval] BSTR* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020001)]
HRESULT Equals(
[in] VARIANT other,
[out, retval] VARIANT_BOOL* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020002)]
HRESULT GetHashCode([out, retval] long* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020003)]
HRESULT GetType([out, retval] _Type** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020004), propget]
HRESULT CodeBase([out, retval] BSTR* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020005), propget]
HRESULT EscapedCodeBase([out, retval] BSTR* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020006)]
HRESULT GetName([out, retval] _AssemblyName** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020007),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetName")]
HRESULT GetName_2(
[in] VARIANT_BOOL copiedName,
[out, retval] _AssemblyName** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020008), propget]
HRESULT FullName([out, retval] BSTR* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020009), propget]
HRESULT EntryPoint([out, retval] _MethodInfo** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000a),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetType")]
HRESULT GetType_2(
[in] BSTR name,
[out, retval] _Type** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000b),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetType")]
HRESULT GetType_3(
[in] BSTR name,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL throwOnError,
[out, retval] _Type** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000c)]
HRESULT GetExportedTypes([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Type*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000d)]
HRESULT GetTypes([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Type*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000e)]
HRESULT GetManifestResourceStream(
[in] _Type* Type,
[in] BSTR name,
[out, retval] _Stream** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002000f),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetManifestResourceStream")]
HRESULT GetManifestResourceStream_2(
[in] BSTR name,
[out, retval] _Stream** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020010)]
HRESULT GetFile(
[in] BSTR name,
[out, retval] _FileStream** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020011)]
HRESULT GetFiles([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_FileStream*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020012),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetFiles")]
HRESULT GetFiles_2(
[in] VARIANT_BOOL getResourceModules,
[out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_FileStream*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020013)]
HRESULT GetManifestResourceNames([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(BSTR)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020014)]
HRESULT GetManifestResourceInfo(
[in] BSTR resourceName,
[out, retval] _ManifestResourceInfo** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020015), propget]
HRESULT Location([out, retval] BSTR* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020016), propget]
HRESULT Evidence([out, retval] _Evidence** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020017)]
HRESULT GetCustomAttributes(
[in] _Type* attributeType,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL inherit,
[out, retval] SAFEARRAY(VARIANT)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020018),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetCustomAttributes")]
HRESULT GetCustomAttributes_2(
[in] VARIANT_BOOL inherit,
[out, retval] SAFEARRAY(VARIANT)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020019)]
HRESULT IsDefined(
[in] _Type* attributeType,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL inherit,
[out, retval] VARIANT_BOOL* pRetVal);
[id(0x6002001a)]
HRESULT GetObjectData(
[in] _SerializationInfo* info,
[in] StreamingContext Context);
[id(0x6002001b)]
HRESULT add_ModuleResolve([in] _ModuleResolveEventHandler* value);
[id(0x6002001c)]
HRESULT remove_ModuleResolve([in] _ModuleResolveEventHandler* value);
[id(0x6002001d),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetType")]
HRESULT GetType_4(
[in] BSTR name,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL throwOnError,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL ignoreCase,
[out, retval] _Type** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002001e)]
HRESULT GetSatelliteAssembly(
[in] _CultureInfo* culture,
[out, retval] _Assembly** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002001f),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetSatelliteAssembly")]
HRESULT GetSatelliteAssembly_2(
[in] _CultureInfo* culture,
[in] _Version* Version,
[out, retval] _Assembly** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020020)]
HRESULT LoadModule(
[in] BSTR moduleName,
[in] SAFEARRAY(unsigned char) rawModule,
[out, retval] _Module** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020021),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "LoadModule")]
HRESULT LoadModule_2(
[in] BSTR moduleName,
[in] SAFEARRAY(unsigned char) rawModule,
[in] SAFEARRAY(unsigned char) rawSymbolStore,
[out, retval] _Module** pRetVal);
[id(0x60020022)]
HRESULT CreateInstance(
[in] BSTR typeName,
[out, retval] VARIANT* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020023),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "CreateInstance")]
HRESULT CreateInstance_2(
[in] BSTR typeName,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL ignoreCase,
[out, retval] VARIANT* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020024),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "CreateInstance")]
HRESULT CreateInstance_3(
[in] BSTR typeName,
[in] VARIANT_BOOL ignoreCase,
[in] BindingFlags bindingAttr,
[in] _Binder* Binder,
[in] SAFEARRAY(VARIANT) args,
[in] _CultureInfo* culture,
[in] SAFEARRAY(VARIANT) activationAttributes,
[out, retval] VARIANT* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020025)]
HRESULT GetLoadedModules([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Module*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020026),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetLoadedModules")]
HRESULT GetLoadedModules_2(
[in] VARIANT_BOOL getResourceModules,
[out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Module*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020027)]
HRESULT GetModules([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Module*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020028),
custom({0F21F359-AB84-41E8-9A78-36D110E6D2F9}, "GetModules")]
HRESULT GetModules_2(
[in] VARIANT_BOOL getResourceModules,
[out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_Module*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x60020029)]
HRESULT GetModule(
[in] BSTR name,
[out, retval] _Module** pRetVal);
[id(0x6002002a)]
HRESULT GetReferencedAssemblies([out, retval] SAFEARRAY(_AssemblyName*)* pRetVal);
[id(0x6002002b), propget]
HRESULT GlobalAssemblyCache([out, retval] VARIANT_BOOL* pRetVal);
};
modified 13-Jul-16 16:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well done! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
you solved your problem! 
|
|
|
|
|
are there any examples on how do i call stored procedures with parameters using Dapper.net using query async? Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
There's an example of calling a stored procedure right on the project home page[^]:
var user = cnn.Query<User>("spGetUser", new { Id = 1 }, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure).SingleOrDefault();
Changing that to QueryAsync is fairly simple:
IEnumerable<User> users = await cnn.QueryAsync<User>("spGetUser", new { Id = 1 }, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);
User user = users.SingleOrDefault();
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saw this in an example when setting properties.
Is this some kind of special ASP.NET MVC syntax?
var movie = new Movie() {
Name = "Shrek!"
};
Where Name is a property of the class Movie.
|
|
|
|
|
No, there's no such thing as a "special syntax for ASP.NET MVC".
That's standard C# syntax that's been around since VS2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Read this. Seriously, do it.
"If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or mark it down. Insults are not welcome"
"Insults, slap-downs and sarcasm aren't welcome. Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid"
modified 28-Jun-16 9:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Read Dave's response again. He didn't insult you; he just answered your question - and correctly at that. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm... what's wrong with you?
How on this planet did I insult you?
|
|
|
|
|
I think adding the "Seriously, do it" was unnecessary, like I was some idiot.
You could have only said "please read this" or something.
|
|
|
|
|
larsp777 wrote: I think adding the "Seriously, do it" was unnecessary, like I was some idiot.
Lighten up, Francis. I hate to tell you this, but that's part of my signature. It shows up on everything I post here.
Why do I have that link in there? Because over the 13 years I've been around here I've watched the quality of questions plummet. There are so many "questions" asked around here that don't qualify as questions at all and usually don't have any context to frame the question nor enough detail to answer them.
Asking questions really is a skill. As you are/were a teacher:
Hi! I am a teaches a course in C# for beginners.
you should already know this.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, as said, I realized that it was in your signature and again, I apologize humbly.
Yes, I been a teacher for C# beginners but have alot to learn myself obviously
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, really sorry!
Realize now that it was in your signature.
again, I apologize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
