I can provide a demonstration but I am sure you got my point. For time being, (Chris or Sean) you can see my recent article, most of the images are required to be 640px+ for their content to be visible as my laptop screen is producing higher resolution graphics, so text gets smaller and smaller. I somehow was able to give a note to the readers to right-click and view the images.
But I am sure, CodeProject articles can get a good UX/UI if they include this feature for their stuff and allow authors to add images of the quality they want, and let users view the images at the quality they are needed to be viewed, while maintaining the UI of the post preview page.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
If the author has changed some parts of the article to adapt it to a new technology... why should not be considered "up-to-date" and appear in that list?
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.