|
I use the following code for dependency injection of Register/Login controller. The problem is that I cannot use Repository pattern I have created previously.
private readonly UserManager<AppUser> _userManager;
private readonly SignInManager<AppUser> _signInManager;
private readonly IUserRepository _userRepository;
public HomeController(UserManager<AppUser> userManager, SignInManager<AppUser> signInManager, IUserRepository userRepository)
{
_userManager = userManager;
_signInManager = signInManager;
_userRepository = userRepository;
}
When I run the code, the following error is occured:
Quote: InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type 'CustomizedIdentity.Repositories.IUserRepository' while attempting to activate 'CustomizedIdentity.Controllers.HomeController'.
modified 6-Dec-21 14:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You haven't registered an implementation of your IUserRepository service in your DI container. You need to fix your service registration code to register that service, and any services it depends on.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to create a site on IIS that can allow users to manually thru their mobile phones (yes they will have access to this internal site), and use their AD username/password to login. Anyone that's valid is allowed in. Once authenticated will present the next page. Plus that next page wouldn't allow them on it unless they are authenticated. Does anyone have any sample ASP.NET Web examples to get me started? Don't usually develop applications within IIS other than HTML pages so looking for any samples to get me started. Having a hard time finding one that isn't how to use Azure online.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm creating models for my ASP.NET Core project. I want to use "Code First" approach to create database and tables. Please check these annotations to be correct:
[Required]
[DataType(DataType.Date)]
[DisplayFormat(ApplyFormatInEditMode = true, DataFormatString = "{0:MM/dd/yyyy}")]
public DateTime creationDate { get; set; }
[Required]
[DataType(DataType.Time)]
[DisplayFormat(ApplyFormatInEditMode = true, DataFormatString = "{0:HH:mm:ss}")]
public DateTime creationTime { get; set; }
And please tell me that what 0 means inside the curly braces.
|
|
|
|
|
The DataFormatString value is a format string to convert a date to a string in the format shown. The zero gives the position of the data parameter (following the format string) when the format is used, like:
string theDate = string.Format(DataFormatString, someDateTimeValue);
See String.Format Method (System) | Microsoft Docs[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Is data annotation for the time correct?
[DisplayFormat(ApplyFormatInEditMode = true, DataFormatString = "{0:HH:mm:ss}")]
|
|
|
|
|
I deliberately did not answer that part because I don't know the answer. Does it correspond to the documentation?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I did not find any reference for time format. Can I use String type instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I get what you want to do here, which is to create models to match your database perhaps, so each table has a matching model. But your over thinking this, and don't need that much detail. Keep it simple and flexible at first, and only add detail when needed. For some reason Microsoft likes to capitalize the first letter, and will nag you later about the first letter being lower case.
This is an example model in c# to match a DB table or collection. Your example is a like a model used to present data in the view. Even when presenting data in the view, I would keep that simple as well. You want to craft models as simple as possible, and try to make them as reusable as possible to keep models down in count.
public class PORTFOLIOS
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public DateTime TimeStamp { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string CreatedBy { get; set; }
public string UpdatedBy { get; set; }
public DateTime UpdateDate { get; set; }
public string HTML { get; set; }
public string AvatarB64 { get; set; }
public string AvatarName { get; set; }
public string AvatarType { get; set; }
public string AvatarUrl { get; set; }
public int AvatarX { get; set; }
public int AvatarY { get; set; }
}
If it ain't broke don't fix it
Discover my world at jkirkerx.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm using ASP.NET Core 6. I'm trying to establish a local connection with SQL SERVER. The authentication method is Windows Auth. I used the following code in appsettings.json:
"ConnectionStrings": {
"AuthConnectionString": "Server=.;Database=AspNetAuth;Trusted_Connection=True"
}
And following code in program.cs:
builder.Services.AddDbContext<AuthDbContex>(options => options.UseSqlServer(builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("AuthConnectionString")));
builder.Services.AddIdentity<IdentityUser, IdentityRole>().AddEntityFrameworkStores<AuthDbContex>();
I created Migration, but when I try to update database, the following error is occured:
Quote: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure that . is a valid server address?
|
|
|
|
|
In a SQL connection string, . resolves to the local computer.
You can even use it with a named instance - for example: server=.\SQLEXPRESS
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, not seen it used before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used app.UseAuthentication and the problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to allow my users to check if they have ActiveSync enabled for email and if they do return you are good to go, else tell them they need to complete a form. So a simple test I setup tried to start with a powershell.asp page containing:
<form action="doPowershell.asp" method="post">
Network Username: <input type="textbox" name="userName"/>
<input type="submit"/>
</form>
Then the resulting doPowershell.asp page I have for testing:
<%
Dim userName
userName = Request.Form("userName")
response.write(userName)
Server.Execute("activesync.ps1")
%>
the activesync.ps1 file contains
(Get-CASMailbox -Identity <username>).ActiveSyncEnabled
On the screen it outputs the value the user entered and then outputs the content of the ps1 file. Doesn't physically run anything. Thoughts?
Note: The current form doesn't really effect the PowerShell script. Just a shell I wrote to see if I could run it. The PS1 right now is just hardcoded with a physical username.
|
|
|
|
|
"Classic" ASP is ancient and obsolete. It's been effectively "dead" for 20 years now.
The Server.Execute method executes an ASP file. Since your PowerShell script doesn't contain any ASP code, it simply outputs the content of the file.
Update your application to use ASP.NET, and use the PowerShell class from the System.Management.Automation namespace[^] to execute your PowerShell script.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Are there any examples of this with say ASP.NET Web Core 6? I'm pulling out my hair trying to find anyone who did this with recent versions. Also would this still need to rely on a ps1 file or could the commands be loaded directly in code?
|
|
|
|
|
According to this SO thread[^], it's been supported since .NET Core 2.0 and Powershell v6. There's a sample application on GitHub[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to create a web application in my local server. All clients can connect to it through the local network. This server has a static IP and all related settings have been set for port forwarding, so we can access the server and my web application through Internet. I want to use SQLite system in my app.
Is it possible? Can users use data stored in SQLite at the same time?
modified 18-Nov-21 4:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming you mean SQLite:
SQLite works great as the database engine for most low to medium traffic websites (which is to say, most websites). The amount of web traffic that SQLite can handle depends on how heavily the website uses its database. Generally speaking, any site that gets fewer than 100K hits/day should work fine with SQLite. The 100K hits/day figure is a conservative estimate, not a hard upper bound. SQLite has been demonstrated to work with 10 times that amount of traffic.
Note that writing to the database will lock the entire database file. Concurrent writes will not be supported.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
