C / C++ / MFC

David Crow9-Oct-07 5:42

David Crow

9-Oct-07 5:42

This is a good assignment. Report back when you are done and tell us how it went.

"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow

"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne

toxcct9-Oct-07 5:44

toxcct

9-Oct-07 5:44

and you expect us to do your homework ?

bad pupil Poke tongue | ;-P

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

Maximilien9-Oct-07 6:45

Maximilien

9-Oct-07 6:45

ok.

Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

Mark Salsbery9-Oct-07 8:12

Mark Salsbery

9-Oct-07 8:12

Done.

Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
Java | [Coffee]

Hamid_RT9-Oct-07 9:44

Hamid_RT

9-Oct-07 9:44

It enters to stack you must wait for it(FIFO).

Hamid_RT9-Oct-07 9:54

Hamid_RT

9-Oct-07 9:54

See An MFC Calculator Custom Control with No Resource File Dependencies[^]
but next time ask for specific question and also use of a simple search.

toxcct9-Oct-07 21:25

toxcct

9-Oct-07 21:25

Hamid. wrote:
but next time ask for specific question and also use of a simple search

yes, but next time, don't give help to lazy people like that guy who didn't even make the effort of searching the web and the codeproject by itself

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

Theory question about "void pBuffer"

Hamid_RT10-Oct-07 7:06

Hamid_RT

10-Oct-07 7:06

I'm agree with you if I could search so he/she could search himself/herself but I guess maybe he/she needs to this help.;)

Nelek9-Oct-07 4:38

9-Oct-07 4:38

Hi,

When using a buffer to intermediary help to make use of some functions…

If I want to have in the buffer the content of an Array, then I make:

pBuffer = &Array[0];  // or the same: pBuffer = Array;
file->Write (pBuffer , sizeof (Array));

And there is no problem because the array allocates contiguous memory to hold the members and the pointer says where the Array starts, and with the “size of (Array)” I say how many elements have to be written.

But doing the opposite…

::RegQueryValueEx (hWkKey, "SubKey", 0, &dwType, pBuffer, &lnLength); // Read the contents
if (dwType == REG_SZ)	// The registry value is a string, it could be something else though so we better make sure
	szValue = pBuffer;

else if (dwType == REG_BINARY)
	for (int i = 0; i < lnLength; i++)
		Array[i] = *(pBuffer + i);

delete [] pBuffer;
pBuffer = NULL;

The usual assignation works with the string because internally is like a char* and then both uses the start direction to allocate the data in their place till a '\0' is founded, but it should be made using a for when writing the data into the array because there is no way to say how long the array is (like '\0' by the char*) (isn't it?)

Array = *pBuffer;	//error C2440: impossible to convert from 'unsigned char' in 'unsigned char [1252]' 
;	//the fixed size from array makes problems
//or
&Array = pBuffer;	//error C2440: impossible to convert from 'unsigned char *' in 'unsigned char (*)[1252]' 
//or
Array = pBuffer;	//error C2240: impossible to convert from 'unsigned char *' in 'unsigned char [1252]'
//or
&Array[0] = pBuffer;	//error C2109: Left operator must be a "L-Value"
;	//MSDN says "The subscript was used on a variable that was not an array", does it means that a whole array is trying to be placed in one element??

The meaning of the errors (but C2109) and the reason to have them is clear, but...

Is there any other possibility to do it, or the “for” must be used?

Greetings.

--------
M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?

Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you

Wink | ;)

led mike9-Oct-07 5:00

led mike

9-Oct-07 5:00

I am not sure what your question is but have a look at memcpy(...)

Nelek10-Oct-07 0:27

10-Oct-07 0:27

I have taken look to the documentation and it seems to be what I asked for. But...

Quote:
"The memcpy function copies count bytes of src to dest. If the source and destination overlap, this function does not ensure that the original source bytes in the overlapping region are copied before being overwritten. Use memmove to handle overlapping regions."

but in the example both makes exactly the same,

//Output of example code 1
Function:   memmove with overlap
Source:      quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Destination:   brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Result:      The quick quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Length:      49 characters

//output of example code 2
Function:   memcpy with overlap
Source:      quick brown dog jumps over the lazy fox
Destination:   brown dog jumps over the lazy fox
Result:      The quick quick brown dog jumps over the lazy fox
Length:      49 characters

then... why is it said?

Can you tell me an example where the quote of MSDN is true?

Re: Theory question about void pBuffer

led mike10-Oct-07 4:46

led mike

10-Oct-07 4:46

Nelek wrote:
then... why is it said?

what is "what" said? The part about overlapping source and destination? ????

Nelek10-Oct-07 20:45

Re: Theory question about void pBuffer

10-Oct-07 20:45

Yes, what I write in quote.

It is supposed to give problems while overlapping, but the code that they put in the example (I paste some parts)

char string1[60] = "The quick brown dog jumps over the lazy fox";
char string2[60] = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog";
/*                           1         2         3         4         5
 *                  12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
 */

//Other function

   printf( "Function:\tmemmove with overlap\n" );
   printf( "Source:\t\t%s\n", string2 + 4 );
   printf( "Destination:\t%s\n", string2 + 10 );
   memmove( string2 + 10, string2 + 4, 40 );
   printf( "Result:\t\t%s\n", string2 );
   printf( "Length:\t\t%d characters\n\n", strlen( string2 ) );

   printf( "Function:\tmemcpy with overlap\n" );
   printf( "Source:\t\t%s\n", string1 + 4 );
   printf( "Destination:\t%s\n", string1 + 10 );
   memcpy( string1 + 10, string1 + 4, 40 );
   printf( "Result:\t\t%s\n", string1 );
   printf( "Length:\t\t%d characters\n\n", strlen( string1 ) );

gives the results that I worte in the message above, and both are making exactly the same and working good. So I don't understand where the problem is. If I could see an example where the quote is true, then I would understand it better.

led mike11-Oct-07 4:59

led mike

11-Oct-07 4:59

Nelek wrote:
If I could see an example where the quote is true, then I would understand it better.

If the source and destination overlap, this function does not ensure that the original source bytes in the overlapping region are copied before being overwritten.

memmov "does" ensure that the original source bytes are copied before being overwritten.

There is no certain way to give an example where it memcpy fails because the results are not guaranteed. You would have to try experimenting to find a condition where it might fail repeatedly.

Also your documentation appears dated check this out[^]

Re: Theory question about void pBuffer

Nelek12-Oct-07 1:59

12-Oct-07 1:59

Yes,

the only problem is that I am usually using VC++ 6.0 and it would be not the first time I check the MSDN page to look for something, try to use it, and lots of errors because it is for newer versions.

Because of that I use my program's help and my quotes sometimes are old.

But thank you for your time and explications. You have helped me to understand it better

Bram van Kampen9-Oct-07 15:31

Bram van Kampen

9-Oct-07 15:31

Don't quite understand the question, but there seems to be confusion about Arrays, Strings and CStrings. An Array is a continguous section of memory of which the compiler is aware of how it is organised.(Element Size, and Number of Elements). It is closely related to the Pointer to an Element Concept. However, whereas you can change a pointer point to a different location in memory, you cannot do this with a variable declared as an array name.[Error C2240] (The Compiler would soon loose track if you could do these things). A Pointer is more versatile than an array in this respect. However, the compiler still keeps track of the type(and hence size) of the object it points to. A pointer to void should be interpreted as a pointer to 'Nothing in Particular' It has only an address value, all other interresting titbits are ommitted. That means that the compiler cannot dereference a void pointer, it has insufficient information to do so. We use a Pointer to void as a generic pointer, which can be passed on by value, but which we must render usable as pointer by adding information, (i.e. Casting)
A String of characters is closely related to an array of characters, there is actually only one difference, when initialised with a literal text constant, the compiler adds automatically a terminating zero to a string. It would for instance not do that if you initialise an array of integers.
This brings us to a CString. Now, this is an entirely different kettle of fish. The items discussed above are essentially C-constructs, which can ofcourse be used in CPP. A CString is firmly a CPP Class, it is definitely NOT the same as a character array. The properties of a CString are not determined by the Compiler (as in Strings and Arrays) but are implemented as part of the Microsoft Standard Libraries. What makes it confusing for a novice is that aparently CStrings and Strings can often be used interchangably, and that the CString can be initialised to the value of a String. This is all due (and purposely designed to work this way) to the gymnastics carried out in the various methods of the CString class. As an example, A CString contains indeed a buffer containing the Null terminated string representing the value. The Cast Operator (LPCSTR) is written in such a way that it returns a pointer to this buffer. I Suggest that you experiment with the CString Class to get a feel for what I am about here. As for your own Array's, why not write your own dedicated class which keeps track of buffers and sizes, and which 'act' like arrays by using the various 'operator' overrides

LateNightsInNewry

Nelek9-Oct-07 22:14