C#

NameYou wrote:

How do I get the data in the Connect function to the calling function in MainClass?

Public class MyObject
{
    public MyObject()
    {
    }

    public void Connect()
    {
        //Starts all the socket stuff..
        object LockObject = new object()
        lock(LockObject)
        {
            StreamWriter MyStream = File.AppendText("MyFile.txt");
            MyStream.WriteLine(Input);
            MyStream.Close();
        }
    }
    //...OTHER SOCKET RELATED FUNCTIONS GO HERE.
}

Regards

NameYou wrote:

Is there any way that I can write it to memory

Regards

public class MyObject
{
    public static string cFieldVal;

    public MyObject()
    {
    }

    public void Connect()
    {
        //Starts all the socket stuff..
        object LockObject = new object();
        lock(LockObject)
        {
            MessageBox.Show(MyObject.cFieldVal);
            MyObject.cFieldVal=MyObject.cFieldVal+="x";
            //StreamWriter MyStream = File.AppendText("MyFile.txt");
            //MyStream.WriteLine(Input);
           // MyStream.Close();
        }
    }
    //...OTHER SOCKET RELATED FUNCTIONS GO HERE.
}

public class MyObject
{

    public static string cFieldVal="";

    public MyObject()
    {
    }

    public void Connect()
    {
        //Starts all the socket stuff..

        lock(cFieldVal)
        {
            MessageBox.Show(MyObject.cFieldVal);
            MyObject.cFieldVal=MyObject.cFieldVal+="x";
          //  StreamWriter MyStream = File.AppendText("MyFile.txt");
          //  MyStream.WriteLine(Input);
          //  MyStream.Close();
        }
    }
//...OTHER SOCKET RELATED FUNCTIONS GO HERE.
}

Andy Brummer wrote:

Actually, the first block doesn't do any locking at all since each method doesn't share the lock object.

Andy Brummer wrote:

Your example blocks all instances, it doesn't matter how many MyObjects there are, only one of them can execute the locked code at any time.

Removing the static keyword from cFieldVal will protect the value for each instance.

George_Lucian wrote:

i have debugged the code and found out that the function associated to winamp function is executed with no errors

Regards

Mehdi Mousavi wrote:

What am I supposed to do to handle the Serializing/Deserializing the objects as needed?