|
Can somebody help me?
DWORD dwToolStyle = WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW | WS_EX_TOPMOST |WS_EX_WINDOWEDGE;
m_hwndTooltip = ::CreateWindowEx(dwToolStyle, TOOLTIPS_CLASS, NULL,
WS_POPUP | TTS_ALWAYSTIP | TTS_NOPREFIX | TTS_BALLOON,
CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT,
this->GetSafeHwnd(), NULL, ::AfxGetResourceHandle(), NULL);
ASSERT(m_hwndTooltip);
::SendMessage(m_hwndTooltip, TTM_ACTIVATE, (WPARAM)TRUE, NULL);
::SendMessage(m_hwndTooltip, TTM_SETDELAYTIME, TTDT_INITIAL, MAKELONG(1000, 0));
::SendMessage(m_hwndTooltip, TTM_SETDELAYTIME, TTDT_AUTOPOP, MAKELONG(1000, 0));
::SendMessage(m_hwndTooltip, TTM_SETDELAYTIME, TTDT_RESHOW, MAKELONG(1000, 0));
TOOLINFO info = {0};
info.cbSize = sizeof(TOOLINFO);
info.uFlags = TTF_CENTERTIP | TTF_IDISHWND | TTF_SUBCLASS;
info.hwnd = this->GetSafeHwnd();
info.uId = (UINT)::GetDlgItem(this->GetSafeHwnd(), IDC_APPLE);
info.rect = CRect(0, 0, 0, 0);
info.hinst = ::AfxGetResourceHandle();
info.lpszText = _T("You can check this to see\n\n\nwhat is this");
if ( !::SendMessage(m_hwndTooltip, TTM_ADDTOOL, NULL, (LPARAM)&info) )
{
::AfxMessageBox("Add tool fail");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
We have create a C++ DLL. While creating this DLL we have included "string.h" "vector.h" etc and so on...
We are able to compile and able to use exported functions in sample program with out any error.
We have distributed our DLL with .lib and .h files. He reports that when he includes our .h file in his program, it is not compiling (compile or link errors). He is tell this is boz because it has multiply defines. Is there any way to avoide this?
-Nandu
|
|
|
|
|
Nandu_77b wrote: We have distributed our DLL with .lib and .h files. He reports that when he includes our .h file in his program, it is not compiling (compile or link errors). He is tell this is boz because it has multiply defines. Is there any way to avoide this?
Yes. Before distributing your DLL,lib and H files to "him", test them in your own project before you distribute them.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
first debugging, now testing.
What will you ask for next, documentation?
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: What will you ask for next, documentation?
Yes that was my plan. Then I was planning on asking for thinking next. I am trying to ease people into the concept. 
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
probably because he is including your header several times, and because your header is not robust.
have you set an exclusive inclusion system in it (like the following) ?
#pragma once //depending on the compiler. not all support this
#ifndef __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
#define __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks Toxcct,
Do i Need to add the below in my header file
//header.h
#ifndef __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
#define __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
//your header body here...
#endif
OR
Who is going to use the DLL should include my header as below?
#ifndef __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
#define __HEADER_H_INCLUDED__
header.h
#endif
Which is the correct and best approach?
-Nandu
|
|
|
|
|
yes, you put the #ifndef construction in your own header.
now, each time the file is included, this stuff prevents the header content to be actually included more than once.
check this:
yourheader.h
<hr width="95%" />
src1.h:
#include "yourheader.h"
<hr width="95%" />
src1.cpp:
<code>#include "src1.h"</code>
#include "yourheader.h"
do you see what happens in src1.cpp ?
the user is including his own header (src1.h), and your header (yourheader.h).
but the problem is that in src1.cpp, when including yourheader.h, it is already included (by src1.h), thus the "already defined identifier" error.
so by putting such a code in your own header, you prevent such an error to occur; if the header is #included several times in the same compilation unit, only the first inclusion will be taken in account...
|
|
|
|
|
The above eplaination gives me clear understanding, Thanks a lot.
Just for my clarification, one can include yourheader.h file only in src1.h and no need to include it again in src1.cpp. IS this correct?
-Nandu
|
|
|
|
|
yes of course, my example was a bit too fast, but it happens (and i believe that's what happened to you) when you include files that include files that include.... and you can't control exactly what's included anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
TOx back after long time.. great!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
holidays my friend
|
|
|
|
|
Nandu_77b wrote: We have distributed our DLL with .lib and .h files. He reports that when he includes our .h file in his program, it is not compiling (compile or link errors). He is tell this is boz because it has multiply defines.
Please post the exact (full) error message because otherwise we will need to guess...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there.
My use case is rather simple but after looking several hours and trying different things I'm getting clueless.
I want to set the file filter combo box control within an CFileDialog. I have an derived dialog from CFileDialog, where I implemented some special settings. There it should be possible to change the current active file filter type, e.g. from JPG to GIF. And this should affect then also the normal CFileDialog.
I simply can get the dialog item cmb1 which reflects the file filter control and set the wanted filter like here:
CComboBox* pFileTypeCombo = (CComboBox*)wndDlg->GetDlgItem(cmb1);
pFileTypeCombo->SetCurSel(mSelectedFilterID - 1);
This also works but the folder view won't get updated, it still displays all JPG files only in my current folder instead of all GIF files now.
Is there a way to refresh the view or another way of setting the file filter?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
I'd use Spy++ to check just what messages are being sent when the selection changes manually. In order to save doign refreshes so often, maybe the dialog waits for a CBN_CLOSEUP notification message to be sent? Maybe sending CB_SETCURSEL (which you are doing) does not then send a CBN_SELCHANGE notification. After all, why should it? You just changed it yourself!
This is a very dated control we're talking about, and every optimisation under the sun was used to make it perky on 386s (remember windows 3?) and then kept for compatibility.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I looked in Spy++, normally there is sent:
message:0xC06F (Registered:"commdlg_LBSelChangedNotify") wParan:0000470 lParam:00000000
where wParam is simply the ID of cmb1 and lParam the new selected filter ID.
So I tried simply also to send this afterwards using:
SendMessage(0xc06f, cmb1, 1);
But it seems it doesn't work, also if I see this message now also in Spy++
|
|
|
|
|
That's curious... because LBN_SELCHANGE is 1 in my header files, as is CBN_SELCHANGE...
In a "normal" window, the message arrives as follows:
uMsg = WM_COMMAND (which is 0x111...)
High word of wParam = 1, lo word is control ID, so 0x470 doesn't fit that pattern...
So this is not a classic control at all! All bets are off for my answer then, sadly...
Using a registered message is a bit of a hint.
One thought... Being a registered message, that value of 0xc06f may not work between runs of your software. (It *probably* will, but you can't rely on it). So get the message from
UINT m_CustomNotify = RegisterWindowMessage (_T("commdlg_LBSelChangedNotify"));
instead of using a hard coded value.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
hm it's derived dialog but rather standard anyway. Maybe this is depends on OFN_EXPLORER flag is set or not? At least I read it might behave differently then...
Now I used
SendDlgItemMessageA(wndDlg->m_hWnd, cmb1, CB_SETCURSEL, mSelectedFilterID - 1, 0);
SendMessageA(wndDlg->m_hWnd, WM_COMMAND, MAKEWPARAM(cmb1, CBN_SELCHANGE), (LPARAM)wndDlg->GetDlgItem(cmb1));
The control updated but the view still not, so it's seems similar like direct call of SetCurSel
|
|
|
|
|
I solved it! I had to send CBN_SELENDOK instead of CBN_SELCHANGE message...then it worked...
|
|
|
|
|
hi.
i create a new windows forms application project in visual c++.net2005 and add necessary lib and header files.
and in Form1.h ,add this code:
#pragma once
#include "mclmcr.h"
#include "foo2lib.h"
and i do no change in code.
when i compile this solution .it give me 12 errors.and all of them are "redefinition; different type modifiers":
for example :
Error 1 error C2373: 'matGetDir_proxy' : redefinition; different type modifiers E:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2008a\extern\include\mclmcrrt.h 143
.
.
.
but when i create a new win32 console application project and do same workes,compiler give me no error
and solution is run.
please help me to remove these errors.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a structure in C# which is read using a BinaryReader like so:
binaryReader.ReadInt32();
binaryReader.ReadInt32();
binaryReader.ReadString();
binaryReader.ReadString();
I need to be able to send this structure from a C++ app, I have managed to send across the two ints and I realise that the strings have a length marker in front of them but I cannot get it to send the string.
I am currently using a struct like this:
struct MyData
{
int val1;
int val2;
int strLength1;
LPCTSTR string1;
int strLength2;
LPCTSTR string2;
};
This send the ints fine but I get 2 0 length strings.
What am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
One way that works AFAIK is using fixed-length strings, put them in length+chararray on the C/C++ side
and in length+array on the managed side, using some Marshal attribute to indicate that the
array data has to be there, not just a reference.
It is something like [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValArray, SizeConst=16)]
BTW: as always, be wary of different character types.
|
|
|
|
|
At a guess I'd day you need two shorts for your string lengths or possibly even two BYTEs. If C# strings are a development of BSTRs then I doubt the string lengths will be as much as the 4 bytes you get with an int. 4GB long strings are really not what MS want to be supporting I guess. The other thing is you need the character data itself effectively in the structure rather than pointers to the characters (LPCTSTR).
You want something like this.
<br />
struct MyData<br />
{<br />
int val1;<br />
int val2;<br />
unsigned short strLength1;<br />
TCHAR string1[strLength1];<br />
unsigned short strLength2;<br />
TCHAR string2[strLength2];<br />
};<br />
but of course you can't do that directly as strLength1 and strLength2 are not known at compile time. This means you're likely going to have to use some form of serialization/deserilaization rather then just passing a structure unless you can use fixed length strings.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I thought I would end up doing some serialization. I have checked the BinaryWriter documentation and it states
This method first writes the length of the string as a four-byte unsigned integer, and then writes that many characters to the stream. This method writes a length-prefixed string to this stream using the BinaryWriter instance's current Encoding.
So it seems it does need a 4-bytes uint to prefix the length. So my next question is how would I create a byte array containing the strings and the lengths? (C++ is not my strong point!), I know how to create the array using malloc and copy the strings in but not the ints.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I'd say a malloc, or more properly, BYTE* pBuffer = new BYTE[uBufferSize]; is the way to go.
Once you've got your buffer you write the strings in by casting a copy of pBuffer + n to a TCHAR* and
copy your ints in by casting pBuffer + n to an int* and setting its value.
<br />
int* pFirstInt = reinterpret_cast<int*>(pBuffer + 0);<br />
*pFirstInt = nValue;<br />
int* pSecondInt = reinterpret_cast<int*>(pBuffer + 4);<br />
*SecondInt = nValue2;<br />
It's not pretty but then this sort of stuff seldom is. You could create some struct types and cast to
those. Up to you really. There are almost certainly fancier ways to do this with operator << overloading
and stl string stream modifiers but I wouldn't go there unless you've got a lot of complex data to
transfer and you know your stl.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
