|
Thankyou for your code, Johan Hakkesteegt
since now i have some problemes with it but this is not your fault 
Thanky very much, all of you!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
hi all
i have one problem ,when entered salary amount in textbox its only display 2000rs , here i want 2000.00 format .
Pls give me code how can i write that format (2000.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dim mySalary As Double = 2000
txtSalary.Text = mySalary.ToString("$0.00")
...
or
Public Sub txtSalary_Validate(...)...
If IsNumeric(txtSalary.Text) = True Then
txtSalary.Text = CDbl(txtSalary.Text).ToString("$0.00")
End If
End Sub
I don't speak Idiot - please talk slowly and clearly
I don't know what all the fuss is about with America getting it's first black president. Zimbabwe's had one for years and he's sh*t. - Percy Drake , Shrewsbury
Driven to the arms of Heineken by the wife
|
|
|
|
|
Private Sub TextBox1_TextChanged(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles TextBox1.TextChanged
TextBox1.Text = CDbl(TextBox1.Text).ToString("F")
End Sub
but make sure that only numeric values are entered.
My advice is free, and you may get what you paid for.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am getting an error when am sending a data through memorystream in VS 2008.
'There was an error generating the XML document. ---> System.InvalidOperationException: Timeouts are not supported on this stream.
at System.IO.Stream.get_ReadTimeout()'.
I didn't understand that why a simlpe memorystream requires Timeouts.
Any help/suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Viram Pandey
|
|
|
|
|
Without seeing the code you wrote to create the memory stream and the code where this error occured, it's pretty much impossible to tell you what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your response.
Actually i am using a memorystream which contains a data through dataset.
But the issue is a different one, whenever i create a new object of IO.memorystream, in its 'ReadTimeOut' and 'WriteTimeOut' properties, it is showing the message that 'Timeouts are not supported in this stream'. I am nowhere using the timeouts for the memorystream. When my code progresses, the same error is thrown back.
I am attaching a code snippet for your reference. I am using VS 2008 and a WCF service is interacting with a web service.
''''''
Public Shared Function GetCompressedData(ByVal coployeeDataSet As DataSet) As IO.MemoryStream
Dim compressedData As New MemoryStream()
Dim coployeeFormatter As New BinaryFormatter
Dim objCompression As New Compression.GZipStream(compressedData, Compression.CompressionMode.Compress, False)
coployeeDataSet.RemotingFormat = SerializationFormat.Binary
coployeeFormatter.Serialize(objCompression, coployeeDataSet)
Return compressedData
End Function
'''''''
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i have a certifiacte in webserver and i want all of my clients to view the certificate when they try to access the html page in server...(installing certificate is upto client)just i need to show the certificate to proceed further....So please let me now is there any tag or something like that to add in my html page .....to display certificate when clients try to access the html ....
Please let me know....
|
|
|
|
|
You really need to abandon this idea until you get a grasp of the basics of a web server and security. Seriously, pick up a book on Internet Information Server and work through it before you try to do this again. What you're getting into can't be described and "step-by-step" explained in a forum post, to the point that you need to understand it to support it.
There is a VERY good reason why the machines resources are off-limits to code running in web browsers. If you have heard of a "virus", or a "trojan horse", then you really need to stop what you're doing and and learn about why things work in a web browser the way they do.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am Working on the VB.Net to perform a Multithreading to correct the invalid email addresses in Database. The problem is that I have 22,00,00,000 email addresses. So I want, Multiple threads do work on this process .
I am Little bit confusion about how to create more threads and all the threads can work togather but not access the same IDs of Email Address from table .
For doing this I ahve created a list box , in which I devided the IDs of email Addressses into many list items . I want that first thread do work on first list item , Second created thread do work on second list item and so on.
But the problem is that when i created multithreading some list of item is missing and the threads cannot do work on some list of items.
With Regards,
|
|
|
|
|
Multithreading will not actually make your application perform multiple updates at the same time. Instead it will just have the one thread perform one, then the second one, then the third one, then the first one again, etc.
It will be much faster doing the whole thing with SQL. You wouldn't even need an application at all, just a stored procedure or an SQL job.
My advice is free, and you may get what you paid for.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you do not understand the problems exactly.
I ahve lots of email addresses in my database .
and a single query take a lot of time of its execution.
so in this satuation it will happns that may the whole prrocess take
few days in completing which is not useful for me.
thnks!
with best wishes!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
I do understand what you mean. What I am trying to say, is that any application using threading, you write, will always use the capacity of your PC or server in a less efficient way than the database server program would.
Again, multithreading in principle does not make the computer perform multiple actions at the same time. It only makes the computer perform these actions in rapid succession, so it looks like it is doing things at the same time.
Your database server program however can and will (usually) readily use multicore CPU's or servers with multiple CPU's. So it will actually make your PC or server perform multiple actions at the same time.
If you need to sort through that much data, you are going to have to be prepared for a lengthy process, although I seriously doubt it would take days. Hours maybe.
So it would be best if you create one additional field in your table, where you can flag each email address when it has been checked.
That way you can write your SQL so that it only checks unflagged addresses, and your sql job or stored procedure will only have to run for a long time the first time.
My advice is free, and you may get what you paid for.
|
|
|
|
|
But, as Johan quite rightly said, 2 threads wont perform the process twice as quick as 1 thread. Threading just means that you can have more than 1 process running independently of each other, but they still have to share processor time.
EDIT : Actually, I could be wrong here, maybe multi-core processors can run threads concurrently? Maybe someone can shed a light on this?
modified on Friday, April 17, 2009 8:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Liqz wrote: Actually, I could be wrong here, maybe multi-core processors can run threads concurrently?
If they couldn't, what would be the point of multiple cores??
|
|
|
|
|
I realise that processes can be run concurrently using multi-core processors but wasn't sure about threads.
Anyway, thanks for correcting my mistake
|
|
|
|
|
Processors don't execute processes, they execute threads. A process is an operating system concept, not a processor concept. A process is just an organized collection of threads.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah I see, thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
You're not getting it. The SQL Server is a better place to do this. You won't be wasting a ton of time transferring that much data TWICE acrossed the network to the PC doing the processing, plus, multi-threading will only buy you a performance benefit if the PC has multiple processors, or multiple cores. You can't start, say, 10 threads on a single core machine and expect it to go 10 times faster. It doesn't work that way. Starting more threads to process data than there are cores in the machine is a complete waste of time. In a single core machine, the processor can only execute one thread at a time, pausing all other threads until it can get around to each of them.
|
|
|
|
|
220 MILLION or 22 BILLION?
Thats a lot of email addresses. Sort of like a list a spammer would have.
Either way, its going to take a LONG time to process that lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Given either number, I'm not helping this goof ball send spam. I purging my hotmail acct now - what a pain in the butt.
Any suggestions, ideas, or 'constructive criticism' are always welcome.
"There's no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people." - Mr. Garrison
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I have a datagridview and want to insert each row of this into a database(db1) table(sheet1). Both the datagridview and sheet1 has 7 fields. I used the following code but I just wonder what I should fill into the values for insert into statement, provided that except for field1 all of the data is in text format. Field1 is in number format:
Dim dgr1 As DataGridViewRow
For Each dgr1 In Me.DataGridView1.Rows
Dim con As OleDbConnection = New _ OleDbConnection("Provider=Microsoft.jet.oledb.4.0;data source=|DataDirectory|\db1.mdb")
con.Open()
Dim cmd As OleDbCommand = New OleDbCommand("INSERT INTO Sheet1(Field1, _ Field2, Field3, Field4, Field5, Field6, Field7) values()", con)
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
con.Close()
Next
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
If the fields in your database are all TEXT, CHAR, VARCHAR, OR NVARCHAR (i.e. strings) then you can feed pretty much whatever you want into those fields. The fields will accept text and numerical values. Only your first field will require a numerical value. The only thing you need to check is the maximum length of each field against the possible maximum length of each value that you might feed to it.
My advice is free, and you may get what you paid for.
|
|
|
|
|
many thanks for the suggestions.
Can you please give me an example code to fill into value?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
