|
That was easy - really!
And I wasted weeks after weeks to create a component pack for me company... 
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta learn to code faster, that's your problem! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
but i do'nt wanna use usercontrol instead using component class , i have seen a exaple but do'nt know how does it work in component class, please help meeeee
you can see that in this article component has been used!
A ComboBox with a CheckedListBox as a Dropdown[^]
|
|
|
|
|
It's the same thing!
Try it: create the class library, add a UserControl, then edit the class definition to change UserControl to ComboBox.
(You'll probably get a few errors, but those should be easy for you to fix)
And please, learn to use proper capitalisation and "real" words...your message looks like it was written by a twelve year old! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Then how component class differ with usercontrol and class library ?
|
|
|
|
|
btw what you mean by "real" words? 
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect answer!
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know how to change the number in y-axis for line graph. The default number is 20, 40, 80 but I want to change in my line graph the y-axis start with 10, 20, 30, 40 n so on. Do I have to code it or there is setting in chart properties i can change it? Tq
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot to say what charting library you're using. Without that, it's pretty much impossible to answer your question with any accuracy.
|
|
|
|
|
im using System.Web.UI.DataVisualization.Charting;
|
|
|
|
|
|
What have you tried?
Have you tried to make the examples that we given to you earlier work?
Do you need help with reading from a database?
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
What part of
Please read the post titled "How to get an answer to your question" on top of this forum.
This is the second question you asked with the not very helpful title "C#". Did you not understand?
This is:
1) The third time you have posted a "question" with this useless title.
2) Not a question - it's more likely to be a reply to one of the other posts. But since you didn't use the "Reply" mechanism so kindly provided for you, we can't tell which one - which makes the conversation difficult for anyone to follow and understand.
Please, try to think about what you are doing, as you are starting to become a little annoying...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Im sorry i will try to be clear next time..and Thank you the information you provided gave me a light
|
|
|
|
|
|
At our university we are being trained to use Microsoft Dynamics Navision 2013. However, one of my co-students refuses to learn and/or use that software because he claims it is dead (according to his father who is an important CIO).
Apparently Navision is 'bloatware' that went nearly bankrupt and Microsoft decided to buy it and use it for re-profit (as my co-student stated). He told me that in many companies installing Navision or any kind of Microsoft product like that is against company policy because that software is 'horribly inefficient'. I am not sure of the details.
So assuming Navision is dead, then why does my university put it in its program? Why is it 'a preparation for the business world' if the software is allegedly dead in use?
|
|
|
|
|
That's his choice.
But...if he choses not to learn it, then he choses to fail the course. You can't pass an exam on a subject if you know nothing about it. By all means discuss the choice of subjects with your tutor (in a friendly way, don't get abusive, aggressive, or threaten to "not learn it") but it may be imposed on him by the course syllabus and there may be no choice about it's inclusion in the course, or the final exams.
Me? I'd learn it.
COBOL and FORTRAN are old technologies that no IT course is likely to teach: but there are good, well paid jobs for people who know them...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
We had some COBOL in our freshman year.
|
|
|
|
|
So did I.
But that was over thirty years ago... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
*Shudder* I did Fortran77 in my second year and the fun of trying to create a lottery number chooser 
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
CsTreval wrote: So assuming Navision is dead
Well you don't know that for sure unless you check with Microsoft. And ask your teacher why they are teaching this subject. But mainly, don't listen to your co students, as chances are they don't know any more than you do.
|
|
|
|
|
CsTreval wrote: (according to his father who is an important CIO).
Being important doesn't make one right.
Explain me in two lines what Dynamics NAV is, and what it's used for. Next, find me an alternative that's better. Once you found it, prepare for a barrage of questions demanding how it is better.
CsTreval wrote: So assuming Navision is dead, then why does my university put it in its program?
Because you'll have to learn what ERP is - which application is used is hardly relevant, as the landscape will have changed anyway before you hit the workforce.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
CsTreval wrote: However, one of my co-students refuses to learn and/or use that software because he claims it is dead (according to his father who is an important CIO).
I could claim that the moon is made from blue cheese. That doesn't necessarily make it true.CsTreval wrote: He told me that in many companies installing Navision or any kind of Microsoft product like that is against company policy because that software is 'horribly inefficient'.
It sounds like your class mate is full of opinions. I'd love to know what hard data he's using to back this up.
Oh, if Nav was dead, then MS wouldn't just have rolled out Cumulative Update 14 four days ago. Contrary to popular belief, MS don't buy technologies and throw teams at them if they have already killed that technology off. It wouldn't make financial sense for them to do that.
To find out what's going on in the Nav world, it's worth reading through their[^] blog.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course the company itself is not going to talk negatively about itself. Outside verified opinions and views are needed.
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to be misunderstanding the part about not throwing money at things that are dead. And how is your friends "important father" supposed to have better knowledge? Is he a Dynamics Insider? Oh wait a minute, could it be that I happen to know people who work on the Dynamics team? Surely not? Surely I couldn't reach out to them and find out if their product is dead in the water. Heaven forbid that I did that between you asking the question and my answering. Good lord, that would have been positively unprofessional of me.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
