C / C++ / MFC

Richard MacCutchan2-Sep-19 5:42

2-Sep-19 5:42

_Flaviu wrote:
this is the original code

From where?

_Flaviu4-Sep-19 0:30

4-Sep-19 0:30

I get this code from a plain C code which has built for Linux:

C++

int nRespond = _open(device, 020);

Richard MacCutchan4-Sep-19 1:10

4-Sep-19 1:10

You cannot run Linux code on Windows without adjusting it for the differences. Windows does not let you address raw devices in the same way that Linux does. And in fact doing so is very dangerous as you could destroy your entire system.

_Flaviu4-Sep-19 1:18

4-Sep-19 1:18

And is any other method to open a device rather than _open in Windows ? I think I have to made some changes into Linux code to run on Windows ...

modified 4-Sep-19 7:31am.

Richard MacCutchan4-Sep-19 1:31

4-Sep-19 1:31

I gave you a link in my first message above which shows details of how to address devices in Windows. However, the real question is, what exactly are you trying to do?

leon de boer1-Sep-19 22:19

leon de boer

1-Sep-19 22:19

Your flags (020) are linux flags not windows try ( _O_WRONLY | _O_CREAT ) or some normal windows flags

_open, _wopen | Microsoft Docs[^]

I would add even in linux the code really should be written as flags not a value like that for this exact reason.

In vino veritas

modified 2-Sep-19 4:33am.

_Flaviu2-Sep-19 1:37

2-Sep-19 1:37

I have tried this:

C++

int nRespond = _open(device, _O_WRONLY | _O_CREAT);
UINT e = ::GetLastError();

with the same result (error 5). Strange ....

_Flaviu2-Sep-19 3:27

2-Sep-19 3:27

I also tried this:

C++

#include <io.h>

int _tmain(int argc, TCHAR* argv[], TCHAR* envp[])
{

	_open("D:", 0x02 | 0x04);
	UINT e = ::GetLastError();
	cout << e;
}

from cmd line as administrator rights … the same result: 5 (access is denied).

leon de boer2-Sep-19 14:52

leon de boer

2-Sep-19 14:52

Big Errors

You can't open "D:" that isn't a file ... its not linux you don't mount drives

Try

int nRespond = _open("D:\\somefilename.txt", _O_WRONLY | _O_CREAT);
UINT e = ::GetLastError();

I am sure it will open Smile | :)

In vino veritas

_Flaviu4-Sep-19 0:29

4-Sep-19 0:29

Agree. Is there any windows methods to open a disk and get the handle ? Because this nResponse it is used further as a handle ...

Victor Nijegorodov4-Sep-19 1:58

4-Sep-19 1:58

Yes. It is CreateFile function (fileapi.h) | Microsoft Docs

_Flaviu4-Sep-19 9:01

4-Sep-19 9:01

Good idea. I have used CreateFileA, and I get rid of that "access denied". But there a thing that I had afraid: the original code, with _open returned int, and CreateFileA return HANDLE ... casting HANDLE to int is OK ? I guess not ...

Victor Nijegorodov4-Sep-19 9:09

4-Sep-19 9:09

How are you going to use the handle returned from _open ?

leon de boer4-Sep-19 15:03

leon de boer

4-Sep-19 15:03

Windows has GetLastError you notice CreateFile Simply returns invalid handle for an error if you get that then you call GetLastError
GetLastError function (errhandlingapi.h) | Microsoft Docs[^]

That is the equivalent of your original int it's just a non zero number identifying the error, 0 always equals no error.

In vino veritas

Backtracking in C.

Washiko31-Aug-19 20:23

Washiko

31-Aug-19 20:23

Programming.. Backtracking.
I need help with backtracking question.
In an election, five parties won and got
A 20
B 14
C 30 
D 16
E 40

In order to rule, a coalition of More than 60 must be negotiated. But we have restrictions:
A does not sit with D
C does not sit with E

    A B  C  D E
A. 1 1  1 0.  1
B.  1 1. 1 1. 1
C.  1  1. 1 1. 0
D   0  1. 1  1. 1
E. 1.  1. 0. 1.  1

The function should return the number of possible coalitions.. Which is 3.
As soon as the coalition is formed, no need to add more parties. 
A + E + B is not valid

Re: Backtracking in C.

Richard MacCutchan31-Aug-19 20:57

Where are the setting in the Intel Manageability Commander for TLS configuration?

31-Aug-19 20:57

This is a mathematical/logic question, which you need to solve first. Once you have done that then writing the code should be straightforward.

Re: Backtracking in C.

Stefan_Lang3-Sep-19 4:52

Stefan_Lang

3-Sep-19 4:52

Washiko wrote:
A + E + B is not valid

I don't see why not. Above the condition was stated that

Washiko wrote:
a coalition of More than 60 must be negotiated

which means neither A+E nor A+B or B+E would be enough - all three are needed to get more than 60.

As for your program, if you don't know what backtracking means, look up recursion and backtracking. There's nothing difficult about coding these concepts in C. If you do know what it means, write a program and, if at any point you're stuck, show the code you're stuck with.

We don't write full programs for other people on request. If it's homework, we'd do you a disfavor by destroying a chance for you to learn. If it's work, you'd get paid, and you can't expect from others to do that work for you without payment. If it's a contest, it's part of the contest to find out how to write the program - if others do it for you it tells nothing about your skills, and it would be unfair to the other contestants.

GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)

Member 1406801930-Aug-19 3:47

Member 14068019

30-Aug-19 3:47

Hi,

currently I am comparing the MeshCommander and the Intel Manageability Commander for configuring AMT Version 12.

With the MeshCommander I was able to configure AMT Version 12 for a TLS connection.

But I found no way to do the same with the Intel Manageability Commander.
 

1. Where are the setting in the Intel Manageability Commander for TLS configuration?

2. How can I configure TLS with Intel Manageability Commander?
 

    Regards and thanks in advance for helpful answers
           jo123

Re: Where are the setting in the Intel Manageability Commander for TLS configuration?

Richard MacCutchan30-Aug-19 4:53

30-Aug-19 4:53

This has nothing to do with C/C++/MFC, or indeed software in general. Please find a more appropriate forum.

CString to const char*

_Flaviu29-Aug-19 22:48

29-Aug-19 22:48

I am trying to convert a CString to const char*, and I have tried some versions:

C++

CString sTemp("abcd");
const char* chTemp = (LPCSTR)(LPCTSTR)sTemp;

is one of them, but in chTemp I have only one letter from sTemp, not whole string ... why ?

Victor Nijegorodov29-Aug-19 22:55

29-Aug-19 22:55

Is your build a UNICODE one? Then you will have to convert, not just cast your CString data.
See WideCharToMultiByte function (stringapiset.h) | Microsoft Docs or ATL macros like W2A

_Flaviu29-Aug-19 23:08

29-Aug-19 23:08

I have converted the project to multi-byte character set (was unicode) and the behavior is the same ...

_Flaviu29-Aug-19 23:31

29-Aug-19 23:31

I have tried this also:

C++

const char* chTemp = (const char*)sTemp.GetBuffer(0);
sTemp.ReleaseBuffer();
TRACE(">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>%s\n", chTemp);

the project is not multi-byte ... the same result, just one letter (first letter) from the string ...

Victor Nijegorodov29-Aug-19 23:40

29-Aug-19 23:40

_Flaviu wrote:
the project is not multi-byte

Is it "not multi-byte" or "multi-byte"?

_Flaviu29-Aug-19 23:56