Welcome to the Lounge

ChatGPT wrote:

It is not appropriate to use AI or any other automated tools to plagiarize or engage in academic dishonesty. Plagiarism, which refers to the act of presenting someone else's work or ideas as one's own, is considered a serious breach of academic integrity and is strictly prohibited in most educational settings. Using AI to generate original content or ideas can be a useful tool for research and exploration, but it should not be used to deceive or mislead others. It is important to always give credit to the original sources of information and ideas and to adhere to the standards of academic honesty and integrity.

Quote:

It is generally considered unethical and a form of plagiarism to present the work of others as one's own without proper attribution. This applies to written work, including text and other content that is generated by artificial intelligence like myself.

If someone were to use my responses or information that I provide without proper attribution, it could be considered plagiarism. It is important to correctly cite and attribute the sources of information that you use in your own work, including information that is provided by artificial intelligence. This helps to ensure that the original creators of the work are properly credited for their contributions, and it helps to maintain the integrity of the information.

If you are using information from an AI language model like myself in your own work, it is important to properly cite and attribute the source of the information. This can typically be done by including a reference to the AI language model in your citations, along with any relevant details about the model and its training data.

Quote:

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have the ability to track or monitor the use of my responses or information. I am a machine learning model that has been trained to generate human-like text based on the patterns and structures that I was trained on, and my responses are generated automatically in response to prompts and questions. I do not have the ability to monitor or track the use of my responses, or to verify whether or not they have been used by others.

If you are concerned that someone may be using my responses or information as their own without proper attribution, there are a few steps you can take:

Check the source of the information to see if it is properly cited and attributed. If the information is from an AI language model like myself, it should typically be cited and attributed in a similar way to other sources of information.
Check the text or content in question to see if it matches the responses or information that I provide. If the text or content is identical or very similar to my responses, it is possible that it may have been derived from my responses.
If you are still uncertain, you may want to consider seeking additional information or clarification from the person or organization that is using the information. They may be able to provide more information about the source of the content or clarify whether or not it was derived from my responses.

wordnik definition

The purloining or wrongful appropriation of another's ideas, writings, artistic designs, etc., and giving these forth as one's own; specifically, the offense of taking passages from another's compositions, and publishing them, either word for word or in substance, as one's own; literary theft.

OriginalGriff wrote:

Pretty cut copied and dried pasted

Craig Robbins wrote:

Just wish it weren't about 5000 calories per glass!