I guess you never had the joy of writing your code in pencil, on fixed width coding sheets. These were then sent to the data prep department to be punched onto Hollerith (80 column) cards, before being submitted to the computer room for compilation. And then you had to wait a couple of hours for the results which showed you had missed a comma on the second line.
I have however worked on FPGAs, that's a similarly slow process of building/routing. You're not writing things on paper but you're definitely waiting for a really long time for synthesis and routing. I was working on these guys a few years ago now but our builds would take about a couple of hours too. You'd be really disappointed when things didn't quite work or you forgot some debug traces.
It depends how much work your auto-complete does for you. As a learner, you should avoid auto-complete that makes classes and sets of methods for you. If however, all it's doing is completing a word, well... you're learning to program, not to spell... so that little bit of help won't undo what you're learning.
At the end of the day what will make you a better programmer will ultimately be how many hours you spend programming. Practice, practice, practice....
Definitely use a whiteboard or paper for architecting a complicated system (or a software tool like Visio). Last thing you want to do is spend a bunch of time writing software that doesn't really make sense in the grand scale of things (architecture-wise).
Printing aside, you need to first verify that the tree is being built correctly. The only way to do that is to single step through each line of code (the stree() function) using the debugger. Note the values of info, left, and right along the way. As you build the tree on paper, what you see in the debugger should match.
Are you trying to print the tree contents pre-order, in-order, or post-order?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
It's simply a means to provide values for the arguments that will be a good default (or starting point).
For example, if let's say... you're opening a socket to provide some service. By default, most libraries will bind to any (or every) Ethernet address available on a system. Reason you'd want to do this is because you don't necessarily want to only provide the service on one Ethernet device but not the other (for example, servers have multiple Eth devices for load balancing). If however, you do only want the service to be provided on one device, then you can choose to bind to the specific Eth address of interest.
I've used SendMessageW API to direct an EM_SETSEL message to
a designated Edit control to make it locates the searched text
entered from the another Edit control. Why it doesn't provide
visual feedback to reflect its current state?
I used Spy++ to detect the EM_SETSEL message and the message
was correctly listed in the message window.
Can anyone give suggestion?
My current development tool is MSVS Community 2015, project type is Win32 that merely uses A.P.I.
modified 19-May-16 13:01pm.
Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 24-Jun-21 11:27