15,867,453 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by D. Infuehr (Top 3 by date)
D. Infuehr
7-Oct-16 11:25am
View
I want to achieve C++ like syntax. The best so far is Foo->Print(Foo). I want to get Foo inside of Print without passing it as an argument explicitly.
On a Forum where people really answer the question and dont just tell me its impossible, someone has pointed out that i could write a memory access callback invoked when the Foo->Print location is accessed which pushes Foo onto the stack. Then I can call print like it is supposed to work. (like the this pointer)
Does somebody know how to do that?
D. Infuehr
3-Oct-16 15:30pm
View
In C++ this would be trivial. I want to use C++ like syntax in C. I have altered my question to clarify.
Basically
String* r = New_String("Hello");
r->Free(r);
Should become r->Free();
so that the instance does not have to be passed to the methods themselfes.
D. Infuehr
3-Oct-16 15:28pm
View
The compiler cant choose because it complains that no overload is suitable.
My question is about how to Pass the Function around with a single Parameter (of the function) set to a specific value.
I have changed my question to clarify.