16,004,564 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View .NET questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Member 12887991 (Top 3 by date)
Member 12887991
7-Dec-16 18:29pm
View
Sorry. It either says that i'm freeing a pointer that was not previously allocated or it crashes when i dereference the tmp pointer.
Member 12887991
5-Dec-16 13:19pm
View
Yes but i set the prev pointer only when creating a new tail record, so tail->prev gets set to tail , which i am updating shortly.
Are you saying i should also do tail->prev->next=tail->next ?
I'm sorry, i'm still new to this. Could you provide me an alternate way of doing it, i'm interested in doing what you said, it would be much better for an atomic operation.
Member 12887991
5-Dec-16 11:41am
View
I'm not sure what you updated but i think the formatting is now messed up :-)