Click here to Skip to main content
15,113,692 members

Comments by CatchExAs (Top 10 by date)

CatchExAs 27-Nov-15 10:58am View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Nice work
CatchExAs 11-Sep-14 12:40pm View
Only the OP knows exactly what he wants to achieve. If it's to use C++ to rapidly build UI software then my advice might point him in a helpful direction. Insulting him and me helps no one.
CatchExAs 11-Sep-14 8:05am View
Was the designer in VB6 not called 'WinForms' or similar?
If so, then you just sound pompous which is worse.
CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:45pm View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Pretty good work, I've never actually seen someone use this in the wild though.
CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:40pm View
Reason for my vote of 3 \n OK, but how is this useful and would be nice if there was code attached.
CatchExAs 14-Jul-14 17:30pm View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Gave me a few chuckles so whenever I get asked about this will be sure to point them your way.
CatchExAs 10-Jul-14 19:12pm View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Preferred the non-reflective version, but still nice. But why not fix the problem at source (i.e. in the sproc)?
CatchExAs 10-Jul-14 14:38pm View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n Nice explanation
CatchExAs 8-Jul-14 19:08pm View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Would like to hear more about the code generator.
Interop with a C/C lib is unlikely to provide better performance, I tried this in my parallelism article.
Your delegate usage is better than my hard coded version ;)
CatchExAs 30-Apr-14 9:31am View
Reason for my vote of 3 \n I was going to give you 5 but, I can't help but think that you'd find it easier to build this with Rx or StreamInsight. If you can argue otherwise and I can modify my vote then I will :)