.NET (Core and Framework)

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

I'm not sure I understand the question

Guffa wrote:

Why does your generic GetEnumerator method return a non-generic enumerator?

Captain See Sharp wrote:

CP seen those as HTML tags and removed them, I should have checked "ignore html tags" when I posted it. It is generic in my project.

public class test : IEnumerable<string> {

	#region IEnumerable<string> Members

	public IEnumerator<string> GetEnumerator() {
		throw new Exception("The method or operation is not implemented.");
	}

	#endregion

	#region IEnumerable Members

	IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() {
		throw new Exception("The method or operation is not implemented.");
	}

	#endregion
}

Guffa wrote:

I would implement both of them, even if one is rarely used. There might be a situation where you would need the non-generic one.

[Browsable(false)]<br />
public CollectionType Collection<br />
{<br />
get{;}<br />
set{;}<br />
}

//<br />
// Version information for an assembly consists of the following four values:<br />
//<br />
//      Major Version<br />
//      Minor Version <br />
//      Build Number<br />
//      Revision<br />
//<br />
// You can specify all the values or you can default the Revision and Build Numbers <br />
// by using the '*' as shown below:<br />
<br />
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.2.1.*")]

indian143 wrote:

Can anybody please tell me in detail. Thank you.

indian143 wrote:

Yes sir, I got it. But why are you so angry. I am sorry. I know that its very basic, but I didnt observe. Thank you