|
The answer is "No you cannot". But you can apply various method to achieve that simpley
You can remind in your two variable your first id and last id, if they are incremental. on various occasion we have to create more than one static object, dynamically.
I wish I could believe there is an after life.
|
|
|
|
|
The Add Variable wizard does not support what you want to do.
However, you can add the variables manually to get at what you're trying to do.
For the first text box, right click and select Add Variable.
Then select the datatype as int and enter the name of the variable as m_chan.
After this, open the dialog header file and change the member variable from int m_chan; to int m_chan[8];.
Now open the dialog source file and make the following changes -
At the dialog constructor remove the line , m_chan(0).
In the DoDataExchange function, remove the line DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT1, m_chan); and add the following lines -
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT1, m_chan[0]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT2, m_chan[1]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT3, m_chan[2]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT4, m_chan[3]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT5, m_chan[4]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT6, m_chan[5]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT7, m_chan[6]);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT8, m_chan[7]);
Here, replace the IDs of the edit boxes to the appropriate IDs.
|
|
|
|
|
The wizard is limited; you should get used to skip the wizard. Many times it's even faster to add something to your code, than using the wizard. What you want is possible (as shown already), but not with the wizard.
|
|
|
|
|
how do i go abt starting creating a client and server program will really appreciate a the help than
|
|
|
|
|
Start here.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have created a win32 dll(VC++). And I know the appropriate .net assembly file which contains the required methods.
I want to access those methods from my DLL.
I came to know , it can possible through C++/CLI interface.
But i'm very new to C++/CLI . So kindly help me to create such interface in C++ which can access those methods using certain assembly/any way.
If have any any sample example (running),then please share me soon. I tried a lot in google , but till now i didn't get any helpful samples .
Thanks in advance Smile 
|
|
|
|
|
Please ask your question ONCE. Crossposting like this will only annoy the people who might otherwise halp you.
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks peter for the information.
Actually i got a suggestion to post in VC++ section while i posted it 1st time.
Thats the reason i posted once again here.
Any thing you would like to suggest, then please...
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot find any response telling you to post it here. This is an obvious C++/CLI question and does not belong in this forum.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Beat me to it. Thanks.
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Someone could have emailed him.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Which goes against the whole point of a threaded forum.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
litu kumar wrote: I have created a win32 dll(VC++).
Presumably this is NOT managed C++.
litu kumar wrote: But i'm very new to C++/CLI
That is problematic. I am rather certain it is not easy even for an experienced programmer. So rather than figuring out details your going to be fighting your lack of knowledge.
It the following a possible solution?
1. Create an managed C++ executable. It wraps your target library and provides the functionality that your other app needs (from the library.)
2. Provide a communications API for that executable. Either sockets, files or stdin/out.
3. Test it
4. Use unmanaged C++ system calls to run the executable and communicate with it.
litu kumar wrote: If have any any sample example (running)
Google seemed to provide plenty of answers. I used the following.
unmanaged c++ to managed c++
One of the links from that google search
Mixing Managed and Unmanaged code[^]
|
|
|
|
|
i want some project to work at them
please can you help me
|
|
|
|
|
I can help you.
Follow this link: Asking a question[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at this link[^] and get some ideas.
Apart of that, with the amount of information given, anyone here can recommend you to go and find a work at the construction sector near your house...
Read the posting guidelines, be specific...
i.e: which fields are you interested in? which is your background? language to be used? time you want to put into that project? ...
|
|
|
|
|
A programming project?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
How do you get every string from every element, control and window from a running process. I am creating an app that keeps people focused and on-task, and what I wanna do is scan every running process, and if the process contains a restricted word from anything (whether be buttons, text boxes, the window title, the text on the window of the application process), it will be closed immediately.
Simple Thanks and Regards,
Brandon T. H.
Programming in C and C++ now, now developing applications, services and drivers (and maybe some kernel modules...psst kernel-mode drivers...psst).
Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison
|
|
|
|
|
You can't do that universally for controls that are owner drawn. However with standard controls you could periodically enumerate (every second or every 5 seconds) all HWNDs and child HWNDs and check some of their parameters for example their window class and you can then do some control-type specific checks.
Window enumeration:
EnumWindows()[^]
EnumChildWindows()[^]
Getting the window class: GetClassName()[^]
In general you can use GetWindowText()[^] to get the titlebar, or button text, editbox text, and so on, but depending on the result of GetClassName() you can do control specific checks.
Conclusion: If you want to handle a lot of controls then you have to check the api of every controls and you will still be unable to handle owner draw controls in some cases.
|
|
|
|
|
pasztorpisti wrote: (every second or every 5 seconds)
Every second? The CPU usage would be skyrocketing, you don't want your application being seen, hogging up the resources of a computer, it looks very unprofessional, guess I'll do it every second. On top of that maybe a system driver, that can intercept execution, just like Faronics(R) Anti-executable or other anti-virus programs.
Maybe the main module or main part of my program should be the driver, since applications cannot reach or even "touch" an app until it runs as a process. But the driver can touch the application before it executes or becomes a process. But it doesn't matter what order it comes in, because the driver will be the first thing to prevent the app from executing. So, the application module of my program will be back up.
Simple Thanks and Regards,
Brandon T. H.
Programming in C and C++ now, now developing applications, services and drivers (and maybe some kernel modules...psst kernel-mode drivers...psst).
Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison
|
|
|
|
|
Because of custom controls you won't be able to solve this problem perfectly. Any solution to this problem will be a big HACK. The 1 second was just a random interval put there, of course you should tweak it and measure it as a delay between the end of the current "scan for strings" and the beginning of the next one instead of between the beginning of two scans.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly what problem are you facing?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
 Totally valid question, I should have asked this in my previous post. My solution is just a dirty brutal-force hack.
|
|
|
|
|
Making people stay on task, since some people could be brilliantly smart with computers or maybe they could even more than that, and be computer programmers and write their own programs to do things that are off-task and/or intercept my software.
Simple Thanks and Regards,
Brandon T. H.
Programming in C and C++ now, now developing applications, services and drivers (and maybe some kernel modules...psst kernel-mode drivers...psst).
Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison
|
|
|
|
|
Only keenness keeps people focused and on task. Your Super-Cop application is going to fail.
(bit philosophical, this time)
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
