|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Article submission only accepts zip files,
It also accepts RAR files.
"Please keep each document file under 10 MB. Please keep each image file under 10 MB and the width < 640px. Permitted file types are: ZIP, RAR, GZ, TAR, 7Z, BZ2, JPG, JPEG, GIF, PNG, SVG, SWF, FLV, MP4."
This is what is written below the upload tool
|
|
|
|
|
My apology, early in the morning.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: My apology, early in the morning.
No need for that Sir, It happens as we are human being!
I've uploaded the source file successfully. I think problem was in the file size.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi How to make download link my source code in article?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I've updated my project and uploaded the new project source file.
However, if I try to download the file, the 404 error occurs.
Can you please check it? I don't know, what I'm doing wrong.
Thanks
Henryk
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if this helps or solves the problem but you should create a ZIP archive rather a 7z one. 7z files require users to install 7Zip while ZIP files can be processed without additional software on most systems. ZIP files are also unzipped for browsing (see Downloads: Registry Export File (.reg) Parser[^]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can't really fix the images on the preview, unfortunately. I've saved copies of all your images. So once you plan to submit your article, please email me and I fix up any broken images once it's been published.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem on this article (my first ever): (https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1164635/Converting-Numbers-to-Text-in-Csharp)
Also, I can't figure out how to make the source code available. I have uploaded it, but it doesn't automatically show up. Am I missing something? (Also, I couldn't figure out how to email you (couldn't find your email address), so I'm replying to this instead.
|
|
|
|
|
They seem to be downloading OK? Our file system is finicky right now. Sometimes it takes a few uploads. Apologies.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Everything seems to be working properly now. I think it was mostly just newbie-user mistakes. Thanks for looking at it!
|
|
|
|
|
One important point is to always use just the image filename, not the full path when specifying img tags
eg img src="NumberConverter.png"
instead of
img src="https://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/1164635/NumberConverter.png"
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that was my mistake. That, and not realizing that after fixing my mistake, the modification would need to go through moderation again. (I expected it to just show up immediately, and was originally confused when it didn't.)
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Posted August 4: [^].
Posted August 6: [^].
It appears to me the author is experiencing each of his discoveries in what C# .NET offers as some form of cosmic revelation; and, that's great, but does it mean an article with very little content needs to be published ?
The first article can be summed up in one sentences:
"You can use Object.GetProperties() to get the Properties of an Object."
The second article celebrates the authors discovery, thanks to suggestions on the first article, of StringBuilder, Extension Methods, and lazy-loading ... the author was so moved by this that rather than revise the first article, he posted a second.
Can we look forward to a third article when the author discovers what the 'BindingFlags enumeration do in a call to Object.GetProperties() ? 
Is this is a case of: my standards for article content need to be "adjusted" downwards sharply ? Yes, I could go there 
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
modified 9-Aug-16 5:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
There are many "approval friendly" moderators who have a quick approval trigger finger. We have called for this to be fixed many times.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: We have called for this to be fixed many times
Not sure how to "fix" this because some of the approving members for this one are Extremely Sensible Members.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Can't be me then. I've never been sensible.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe we could
- Somehow associate article scores to reputation of the approver(s). (this would probably be fairly complex)
- Force an article back into the approval queue* if it gains a certain number of 1 votes from hi-rep members.
- Have a button available to hi-rep members that allows them to request that an article be resubmitted into the approval queue*.
- Being put back into the approval queue would
- delete all article comments and zero out all votes currently attributed to the article
- remove all reputation points for the author connected to the article
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
To approve an article you have to have gold level in one of these: Author, Authority, Editor, Organiser...
Two if these (Authority and Organiser) are good qualities, but not sure are fit to the subject...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
What I don't understand... my report was the first one. So why noone clicked before to "poor quality" or any other of the possibilities?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We need to be careful here, but I get your point.
Firstly, we want to encourage sharing. Secondly we want to encourage high quality sharing.
Just because an article is approved doesn't mean it's up on a gold pedestal. The article rating system is in place specifically to take everything that's published and sort it. If it's truly awful then one hopes it will be de-emphasised, to use a euphemism.
However, the issue of new articles instead of updates is an educational one. How do we encourage updates instead of additions?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: How do we encourage updates instead of additions?
Giving less reputation for posting and more for editing? At the end it is what 98% of those "prolific" posters want.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
