|
Any plan to implement the "compare with published" button anytime soon? 
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] could use a format correction.
@Sean-Ewington put your sunglasses before you open the blog  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My eyes!
All fixed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Coding Challenge: Smallest Circle Problem[^]
Tried to create O(n4), but inside <code> it displayed as is (encoded), <em> works fine however...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Peter, I would recommend (or use myself) the Math library for such formulas or pseudo-representation of algorithms (or this Big O notation). That looks a lot cleaner as compared to Segoe based text. Also, in monospace there is no super or subscript, so I won't consider using it as it won't make any sense either.
Read the LaTex usage by Chris in his article, Article Formatting tips for CodeProject
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you...
I do use LaTeX in my other articles, but it is so small piece of code...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I know my technical blog been downvoted by a high voting member's level. I respect that decision. But, can whoever downvoted it, please provide some guidance on what the problem was and how I can improve it? Please give me a chance to learn for my mistake.
10-Jan-17 2:54AM -40 Author Technical Blog Downvoted Technical Blog Convert DateTime To String Format In IQueryable Query
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean Ewington,
Is it possible to change name of my account to "tranthanhtu.vn".
It is my blog site.
Just ask for sure as I do not want to violate the rules of community and my account be disabled.
It is nice if you could give me your feedback about this.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's a good idea. People will really scrutinize what you posted and how you posted it. If a blog entry came through that even seemed promotional of your blog and went live before you could change it, I have no doubt you would get reported and the fact that your name was your blog name would do you no favors.
While I have you, I would like to re-iterate that you should consider merging some of your series into larger articles. You have a lot potential and I'd encourage you to not post step by step, shorter articles like this:
Angular2 & WebApi (SPA) for Enterprise App - Part 8 - Build & Deploy Application
And focus on publishing fewer articles that are more complete and exhaustive, like this:
WPF: A Beginner's Guide - Part 4 of n
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean Ewington,
Thank for your feedback.
Ideally, My articles will talk around development and deploy enterprise application using angular + WebApi. Each isolated topic, I prefer was in article. So reader can easier to focus on one-by-one.
Yes, For future post, I will consider merging some small article to larger. Hope this make reader happier.
Thanks and regards,
TU Tran
|
|
|
|
|
Please understand that I'd ask you to reconsider your existing series as well. Your articles have been reported many, many times by the members. What's worse is that you're a successful author that can get by posting articles like this, but it encourages authors with less ability and skill to post similarly styled articles because they think if you can do it and be successful, they can too.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank Sean Ewington,
I remember some one already remind me about this and I create as tip/trick rather than article.
Then some others converted them into article.
I understand the problem. I will consider to add more content or merge article together.
Hope I can transfer more information to reader in nice structure of articles.
Regards,
TU Tran
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm having an issue with my article download links. The links work fine on preview but when my article is published I get the following errors:
Wexflow_src.zip:
/KB/cs/1164009/Wexflow_src.zip appears to be missing on our servers. D'oh.
Wexflow_setup.zip
/KB/cs/1164009/Wexflow_setup.zip appears to be missing on our servers. D'oh.
Can you please help me?
Regards,
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm having the same problem again.
Can you help me please?
Akram.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that article.
Now, It's working fine.
Whenever I update my zip files, I get that error. Is there a way to avoid falling in the same error each time I update my zip files.
Kind regards,
|
|
|
|
|
This is an odd one, and one we've been trying to nail for a while.
Just to clarify: you edit your article, you upload new files, and each time you test you're updated article you get that error?
Are you testing the published article, or are you testing the links from the preview?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This how I fall in this error sometimes:
1. I delete the *.zip files from the article
2. I upload my new *.zip files
3. Sometimes when I test on the preview, It tells me that the files are deleted.
4. I go back to the article and I find that my *.zip are duplicated. The old *.zip files re-appear in gray.
5. I re-delete the old *.zip files and test on the preview again. Everything seems to be working fine.
6. I save the article and test again. Everything seems to be working fine.
7. I publish the article. When the article is approved, I test the download links and sometimes I get this error.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.
When you delete the files you're going to get "file not found" errors. Omit Step 1.
Akram El Assas wrote: I go back to the article and I find that my *.zip are duplicated. The old *.zip files re-appear in gray.
This sounds like we need to improve the UI.
What happens is that when you upload new files to an article it keeps the old files and stores the new files under the /working directly. Your new version of your article will point to the /working files, and your current (published) version will point to the existing files. When you delete the files before uploading you're deleting the files from the current version (hence no one can download), but your new uploaded files are available for your new version (which won't be public until it's reviewed by high rep members).
The greyed out files in the list refer to files that you will be replacing with the new uploads you've just added.
Akram El Assas wrote: I publish the article. When the article is approved, I test the download links and sometimes I get this error.
This is the bit that tells me there's an issue our end.
For now, please don't delete anything. Just upload the new files and publish normally.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: For now, please don't delete anything. Just upload the new files and publish normally.
OK, Thanks. I'll do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I noticed that the tables in my Article[^] are no longer being formatted correctly. Yet the html editor in the article submission wizard shows the tables are formatted correctly.
Cheers,
Bill
modified 9-Jan-17 9:23am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
