C / C++ / MFC

FirstPrevNext

How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Aaron Schaefer4-Mar-02 10:47 Aaron Schaefer 4-Mar-02 10:47  Hi All, I am wondering how to get the actual COM interface (let's say ISpeedometer) of an ActiveX control on a dialog in MFC. In ATL, you can do this pretty easily with GetDialogControl, which will give you a pointer to IUknown of the control, which can be queried for the more derived interface of interest. I assume there must be a way to do something like this in MFC. I am trying to get arond the generic wrapper class generated by class wizard which just gets to all of a control's functionality through its IDispatch interface. Thanks, Aaron Re: How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Tomasz Sowinski4-Mar-02 10:50 Tomasz Sowinski 4-Mar-02 10:50  So you have IDispatch? Why don't you QueryInterface for ISpeedometer? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com Re: How to get COM interface of an ActiveX control? Aaron Schaefer5-Mar-02 2:57 Aaron Schaefer 5-Mar-02 2:57  No, I don't have any interfaces. Just the ID of the control on the dialog resource. So I need to get an interface, any interface. I figured out how to do this using CWnd::GetControlUnknown, which gave me IUnknown for the ActiveX control, from which I can query for more specific interfaces. Thanks, Aaron Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET myenigmaself4-Mar-02 9:50 myenigmaself 4-Mar-02 9:50  I recently ported an old VC++ program from 6.0 to .NET. There were a few issues to begin with, but the only thing that I've changed in the product is that I'm using the Shared DLL option to reference MFC now instead of Static Library. The program builds fine and runs, but when I perform pointer intensive operations the performance in .NET is horrible. We're talking an order of magnitude here. Execution that takes 2 seconds in 6.0 takes 30 seconds in .NET. I've tried all the optimizations I can think of but none of them did anything to increase performance. Should I just stick to 6.0 for now? Why is it so slow? It's unmanaged code so I don't think GC would be affecting performance at all. It seems like it is though. What's the deal? Any input is appreciated. myenigmaself http://myenigmaself.gaiden.com myenigmaself@yahoo.com "If debugging is the process of removing bugs from code, programming must be the process of putting them in."~~Dykstra Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 10:11 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 10:11  What you say is very surprising, to say the least. Could you isolate some snippet of code showing this behavior? Also, although I don't think is having any effect, it'd be useful to perform the testing on as similar scenarios as possible --that implies having the same linkage method for MFC. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET myenigmaself4-Mar-02 10:31 myenigmaself 4-Mar-02 10:31  The code would be a little ambiguous taken out of context so let me see if I can figure out a smaller example or see if there is something I can do about this. And could the fact that I have VC++6.0 still installed be messing things up? I think the MFC Versions are getting crossed up. I can no longer used a Shared DLL in my VC++ 6.0 projects. "If debugging is the process of removing bugs from code, programming must be the process of putting them in."~~Dykstra Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET myenigmaself4-Mar-02 11:35 myenigmaself 4-Mar-02 11:35  Forget this. No matter what I do I can't get my old code to use a static library in vc7. Here's the kicker, my code HAS to use a static library in vc6. For some reason I can no longer use the linked dll in vc6. This is messed up. I'm going home. "If debugging is the process of removing bugs from code, programming must be the process of putting them in."~~Dykstra Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET Tomasz Sowinski4-Mar-02 10:11 Tomasz Sowinski 4-Mar-02 10:11  Did you profile both versions of the program? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET Tim Smith4-Mar-02 10:21 Tim Smith 4-Mar-02 10:21  Debug build? Have you disabled the new /GS option? Tim Smith I know what you're thinking punk, you're thinking did he spell check this document? Well, to tell you the truth I kinda forgot myself in all this excitement. But being this here's CodeProject, the most powerful forums in the world and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk? Re: Efficiency issues from VC++6.0 to VC++.NET myenigmaself4-Mar-02 10:39 myenigmaself 4-Mar-02 10:39  Yes, I tried it with the Buffer Security Check turned off but that didn't effect performance at all. "If debugging is the process of removing bugs from code, programming must be the process of putting them in."~~Dykstra how to retrieve member data using HWND? lucy4-Mar-02 8:07 lucy 4-Mar-02 8:07  Hi, gurus, I created a worker thread in CMyView using AfxBeginThread(MyThread, GetSafeHwnd()); and my worker thread is declared as: UINT MyThread(LPVOID pParam); If I want to use a data member (m_nData) of CMyView in MyThread(), how I can get it using (HWND)pParam? Any hint is highly appreciated! Re: how to retrieve member data using HWND? Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 8:18 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 8:18  Can you afford passing the address of the CMyView object itself to the thread, rather than the HWND? I.e. why not call AfxBeginThread(MyThread, this), which gives you access to the whole object, its m_nData member and its HWND (through m_hWnd member.) Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Re: how to retrieve member data using HWND? lucy4-Mar-02 8:24 lucy 4-Mar-02 8:24  Got it. Done. Thank you so much! (I feel so stupid sticking to GetSafeHwnd) Selecting an area with the mouse Rage4-Mar-02 6:17 Rage 4-Mar-02 6:17  Hi ! I´m currently coding an application that displays graphically mathematical curves (with a CDC). I´d like to implement a zoom on it, that is: the user clicks, and when he moves the mouse while holding the mouse button down, the prg draws a rectangle with dot lines. When the user stops maintaining the mouse button down, it zooms-in. (The whole thing acts like selecting two or more icons on the desktop of windows, for example). Well, i actually want to know an easy way to draw the rectangle with dot lines ... because I suppose it must be another way than saving the background, drawing the rectangle, and - when the user moves - redisplaying the saved background and redrawing the rectangle, must´nt it? RaGe Unfortunately, brute-force solutions tend to be slow even when performed by modern-day microcomputers, which are capable of several MIPS except when I'm late for an appointment and want to finish a compile and run just one more test before I leave, in which case the crystal in my computer is apparently designed to automatically revert to 1 Hz. -- Michael Abrash Re: Selecting an area with the mouse Tomasz Sowinski4-Mar-02 6:15 Tomasz Sowinski 4-Mar-02 6:15  Try DrawFocusRect. It works in XOR mode - drawing it twice removes it from the screen. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com Re: Selecting an area with the mouse Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 7:04 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 7:04  An alternative to Tomasz' suggestion is using <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vcmfc98/html/_mfc_crecttracker.asp">CRectTracker</a>. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Simple but Painfully Annoying ScottS4-Mar-02 5:34 ScottS 4-Mar-02 5:34  I am very close to losing my sanity trying to build some code with visual c++. I am sure the problem will have a very simple solution but i could do with some help none the less. I have a program with six source code files and six associated header files, they all compile fine but when trying to link i get the following error. test.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "void __cdecl mht_associate(struct tracker_struct * *,struct measurements_struct * *,struct parameter_struct *,int,double * * *,int,int,int,int)" (?mht_associate@@YAXPAPAUtracker_struct@@PAPAUmeas urements_struct@@PAUparameter_struct@@HPAPAPANHHHH@Z) Debug/mht.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Error executing link.exe. The funcion being called in a file test.c and is defined in a file mhtwrapper.h, the code is contained in mhtwrapper.c.I have checked for all the simple mistakes that i can think of, such a spelling errors and i have tried declaring the function as external with no joy. When i run dumpbin on the mhtwrapper.obj file the function symbol does seem to be defined. Symbol index: 10 Base line number: 14 Symbol name = _mht_associate 0000001B( 15) 00000022( 16) 00000029( 17) 00000030( 20) 00000037( 22) 0000003E( 23) 00000058( 25) 00000072( 27) 00000091( 28) 00000093( 29) 00000095( 30) 000000A6( 32) 000000B5( 34) 000000C4( 35) 000000D5( 37) 000000E8( 38) 000000FB( 39) 0000010E( 41) 0000012A( 43) 00000146( 45) 00000175( 46) 000001A4( 47) 000001D3( 48) 000001D8( 49) 000001DD( 50) 000001ED( 51) 000001FF( 52) 00000211( 53) 0000021D( 54) 00000229( 55) 00000235( 58) 0000023C( 59) 0000025A( 61) 00000278( 63) 00000297( 64) 000002CB( 67) 000002DB( 69) 000002F3( 70) 0000030D( 73) 00000316( 74) 00000326( 76) 00000342( 78) 00000387( 79) 0000039F( 81) 000003EE( 82) 000003F0( 83) 000003F5( 84) 000003FA( 85) 000003FF( 86) 00000404( 87) 0000041B( 89) 00000445( 91) 0000044E( 92) 0000046C( 94) 0000047C( 95) 00000498( 98) 000004D8( 101) 00000518( 103) 00000534( 106) 0000057F( 109) 000005CA( 110) 000005CF( 111) 000005D4( 113) 000005FB( 114) 00000624( 115) 00000639( 118) 0000063E( 120) 0000064A( 123) and 010 00000000 SECT3 notype () External | _mht_associate tag index 0000001A size 0000066E lines 00000DA8 next function 00000000 Any advice would be gratly appriciated. Thanks Scott Sims Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying Tim Deveaux4-Mar-02 5:49 Tim Deveaux 4-Mar-02 5:49  Well, I had a similar problem the other day when compiling some c code with the settings (calling convention) set for __cdecl when it should have been __stdcall... (Don't laugh folks - someday one of these pitifully lame suggestions will actually help someone, and _then_ I'll be cool... ) Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying ScottS4-Mar-02 5:57 ScottS 4-Mar-02 5:57  Thanks but i have allready tried and it has no effect Scott Sims Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 7:12 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 7:12  Excuse my insistence, but that name mangling thing caught my eye... is your test program file actually called test.c and not test.cpp? The compiler seems to be producing C++ code, not C. Also, the mhtwrapper.obj dump suggests that mht_associate is being compiled with extern "C" (not to be confounded with __cdecl) name decoration. If this is all obvious to you please feel free to ignore my post --but I thought it might be worth pointing out, just in case. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying ScottS4-Mar-02 7:33 ScottS 4-Mar-02 7:33  I think you might be on the right track but i am a little lost, the test file was called test.cpp and not test.c which i have now changed. The change in file type seems to make no ovious difference, i still get the same error. But when i try to add the extern "C" to the decloraction of the unresolved function i get the following error, extern "C" void mht_associate(struct s1 **a, struct s2 **b, struct s3 *c, int d, double ***e, int f, int g, int h, int i); g:\work\qunetiq mht\mhtwrapper.h(11) : error C2059: syntax error : 'string' Thanks Scott Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 7:47 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 7:47  OK... So you have to anwer yourself a question: Do you want the wrapper thing to work in C++ or in C? If it's the former, change everything to .cpp, forget about extern "C", and everything should be right. If it's the latter, then you might be in trouble, cause that string seems to be C++ std::string, which of course cannot be included in a C program. Anyway, this is like walking in the dark a little code would go a long way. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying ScottS4-Mar-02 8:00 ScottS 4-Mar-02 8:00  I assume from what you are saying is that some code appears to be compiling as C++ and other code as C(I need platform independent pure C code) and the linker is struggling with this. So is there a compiler switch to force the compiler into pure C. Im sorry about the lack of code but unfortunatly that is unavoidable. Thanks for your time Scott Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying Joaquín M López Muñoz4-Mar-02 8:06 Joaquín M López Muñoz 4-Mar-02 8:06  OK, pure C. Then, rename everything to .c, drop every extern "C" out and do a fresh rebuild (Project -> Rebuild All.) What's the result now? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo Re: Simple but Painfully Annoying ScottS4-Mar-02 9:08 ScottS 4-Mar-02 9:08  Doing as you said had no effect but by adding \Tc to the compiler options forces pure C and i now have got the program running, thank you very much for your help it is greatly appriciated. Scott

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 24-May-24 7:43 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...17354173551735617357173581735917360173611736217363 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.