|
What SQL code are using for updating the record?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, everyone!
After setting a break point on some statements, and run Build --> Start Debug --> Go from Build Menu of VC 6.0, the following dialog occurs:
----------
Does not contain debugging information. Press OK to continue.
----------
BTW: my project is a MFC project.
How to enable debug ability in my project?
Thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
You're probably trying to debug a release build. For general debugging, you want to have a debug build. In the Build > Set Active Configuration dialog, you should have the configuration ending in 'Win32 Debug' selected.
The message pops up because the executable doesn't contain a section called the Debug Directory, which tells the debugger where to find debugging information. This information takes up a lot of space, and so is only generated if you ask for it.
If you need to debug a release build, you need to build it with debugging information turned on. In Project > Settings, select 'Win32 Release' in the Settings For box, then on the C++ tab, select the General category and select Program Database in the Debug Info drop-down. Then, on the Link tab, in the General category, check the Generate Debug Info box. Rebuild your project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The book "Visual C++ .Net in 21 days" by SAMS in Chapter 14 said:
DLL can share functionality with other application. That means DLL
can let me build a set of application functionality to be used in an
application that another programmer is building. But how?
Right now I am building a project for my programming clas. The project
is a music program, and I'm using some functionality wirtten by another
programmer -- "speaker.dll" and "speak.c". Those files can let the computer
make peep sound. Any idea how do I use it?
|
|
|
|
|
"speaker.dll" and "speak.h" should lie in your project directory.
Usage: extern "C" void yourfun();
Hello World!
|
|
|
|
|
What's that? extern "C void yourfun();"? Where should I
put that statement? in the header file? Should I add it
to my project like the header file? We need to add the
header file to the project, then how about the speak.dll?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to add the speak.dll into my current project via the solution
explorer, and added it to the reference. However I got an error.
Anyone know what did I do wrong? How can I add a dll file into a
project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
it said: "Add Reference: Error adding reference to the project."
|
|
|
|
|
Converting a class I have into a class template
so that I can utilize it for various data types.
I've never used templates before, and am trying
to sort a few things out.
In the class I currently hold data in an array of
doubles by declaring a pointer to the data.
<br />
double* m_pdData;<br />
and then initialize using the operator new. So that
<br />
m_pdData = new[double dSize];<br />
I'm not entirely clear on how to declare these items
in a templated version of the class.
Would their equivalents be:
<br />
T* m_pdData;<br />
and
<br />
m_pdData = new[T dSize];<br />
or is there a little bit more to it??
Also, what is the notation convention?
ie: for a member function that's a pointer
to type double we prefix with m_pd
for a template what would be the equivalent...
m_p???
TIA.
John Theal
Physicist/Mathematical Programmer
Digital Immersion Software Corporation
Got CAD?
http://www.presenter3d.com[^]
http://www.merlin3d.com[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Change "m_pdData = new[T dSize];" to:
m_pdData = new T[dSize];
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use your templated type anywhere you would use a normal type although you have to qualify it with the appropriate template parameters e.g.
<br />
T<int>* pData = new T<int>[ 100 ] ; <br />
I usually create a typedef to make things more readable:
<br />
typedef T<int> MyIntClass ; <br />
MyIntClass* pData = new MyIntClass[ 100 ] ;<br />
Likewise for pointers to member functions although there are pitfalls: you can't take the address of a function of the template class, you can only take the address of a function of an *instantiated* template class i.e. you can't do &T::fn, only &T<int>::fn.
WRT to variable naming, it's time to drop the Hungarian, it just doesn't work with OO. I just use m for member variables, p for pointers, g for globals and r for references. Anything else will drive you nuts! 
"Sucks less" isn't progress - Kent Beck [^]
Awasu 1.1.2 [^]: A free RSS reader with support for Code Project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Friends
I am using MFC Doc/View architecture for printing some lines.
I want to display a Few Lines on the View and then take the printout.
I am trying to use MM_LOENGLISH map mode but could not get things done.
Can someone Please Give me a 10cm Line on Printer.
Also I wish to find out the paper size in cm or may be in pixel.
Trying to get through OnPreparePrinting 's PrintInfo but i get some -ve values of the rectangle
Plz Help
|
|
|
|
|
Here you go:
-------------------
-----------------------
Best not to ask too many serious questions Saturday night.
J.
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I remembered that after i had posted the question.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a CFormView. If I remove the menu, then it will look
alot more like a CDialog, but yet retain alot of built in
MFC functionality. Is there anyway to remove the menu? I
can't just delete it because I get an error.
|
|
|
|
|
The menu is part of the CDocTemplate, at least in the document / view architecture. The CFormView can handle messages from the menu, but it is not necessary to it. The error is most likely the CDocTemplate complaining that it can't find the IDR_MAINFRAME Menu, if you deleted it. YOu probly will have to set the style of the MainFrame window to exclude the menu, and replace IDR_MAINFRAME with NULL.
J.
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I receive the error "Failed to create empty document".
How can I set the style of the MainFrame window to exclude the menu
and replace IDR_MAINFRAME with NULL? By chance, do you have any
code that you can share?
Please, any response you can give me will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Danielle (an overworked graduate student)
|
|
|
|
|
It is in your App clas. Look for the class that says CSomeApp, with Some replaced with the name you chose. If it is a SDI it looks like
pDocTemplate = new CSingleDocTemplate(
IDR_MAINFRAME // Change this to NULL
RUNTIME_CLASS(CFlightTracerDoc),
.
.
.
J.
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
You must also override PreCreateWindow in CMainFrame and insert the following code
BOOL CMainFrame::PreCreateWindow(CREATESTRUCT& cs)
{
cs.hMenu = NULL; // Insert this code
.
.
.
J.
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I have some code that I get the following error when
Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'rasterizer' was corrupted. This only happens in debug. And it ONLY happens if i turn on the Basic Runtime Checks setting for C++ has Stack frames turned on (/RTCs).
The rasterizer variable is a stack based template class from the AGG[^] graphics lib, which makes HEAVY use of template classes.
The code in question is in the else branch of an if statement, and at runtime is NOT getting executed, and since the variable is within the scope of the else block, it's not getting instantiated either.
If I comment the chunk out, then everything is hunk dory. If I use the default settings for Basic Runtime Checks then everything is OK as well.
Is this something to be concerned about? Whoudl I just use the default settings? Is this some new behaviour introduced into the VC7 C++ compiler?
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire!
Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)!
SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0
0 rows returned
|
|
|
|
|
In a debug build, the compiler generates stack frame setup code to account for every variable separately. In a release build, the optimiser works out which variables have overlapping lifetimes and allocates only enough space for the variables that can't share the same memory locations.
If you enable /RTCs, the compiler adds additional padding around any variables that it thinks could be subject to buffer overrun errors, and fills it with particular values. At the end of the function, the generated code checks to see if the values have been modified - if they have, it generates the runtime check dialog you saw.
You should leave this option turned on, and fix the buffer overflow that it detected. It could easily mean that a different variable had the overflow. To detect which variable, generate a listing file (/FAs or /FAcs) and examine the resulting .asm or .cod file to see where the compiler allocated each local variable. Alternatively you could inspect the addresses in the debugger.
If you can work out which area of memory is being corrupted, you can use the debugger's Data Breakpoint facility to discover which piece of code is writing to that address.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
