|
A QA answer came up in moderation:
Another notable license management service which will allow you to protect your .NET software is [REDACTED]. The service is completely free, you pay only regular payment service providers fees (e.g. [REDACTED]).
(I removed the service url and the popular online payment service because that was part of the detection)
OK, it's free - he says - but...He joined today, and the question he was answering was posted in 2011 with two existing solutions.
I think it's spam, but if it isn't, it's abuse...
From this: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11945340[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Tenth what applied. Gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But then how to we pack and move it all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just let through a message that I normally would have nuked.
But since it's been posted in the press releases forum (by a member with a load of articles that it would be a pity to lose) I've let it through.
Here's [^]the message.
What's your take?
Nuking the user is out of the question as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
Press releases is a big difficult for me to say where are the limits. I would ask @Sean-ewington or @Chris-maunder for that one
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Press releases are intended to discuss stuff that's newsworthy. That press release was, unfortunately, an advertisement. This article[^] sums it up nicely.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, so next time I'll follow my gut feeling.
But I have a follow up question.
In the old times, or actually quite recently, if you nuked a message the user got nuked with it.
I know that's not the case anymore, but is the user getting any kind of reports at all any more?
Because that was actually my main reason for not reporting it as spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Nuking a message no longer nukes the author.
However, you can also just email us and ask us to quietly remove a post.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No, the user doesn't get a report. They're just left wondering what happened.
|
|
|
|