|
OK, thanks again, John. I'll think about.
Wolfgang
|
|
|
|
|
I will agree with John about the CPU, PSU>500Watt and the 4G Ram but I don't think you will need something special in graphics and motherboard department. 680 is needed if you want to use SLI x16 or if you're an advanced overlocker...I think a cheap 965 mobo will be good for you...also you don't need expensive GPU...a 8500GT or 7600GT will be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kallileo,
well, I don't need much graphical power, that's right, and I don't care two figs about overclocking. So, how do you think about a 965p DS3 mobo / alternatively a DQ6? Or is there already something better on the market?
Wolfgang
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't really matter for you. Any motherboard with 965 is good. The main difference between DS3 and DQ6 is that DQ6 has native RAID support via Intel ICH8R(southbgridge). DS3 has ICH8 and raid support via Jmicron controller not through Southbridge.
Both very good mobos. I had a DS4 and I didn't have any problems...
If you're going to buy Gigabyte mobo look for 3.3 Version because it has native 1333fsb support for the upcoming Intel CPUs but I think older version will work fine too.
Also Asus P5B Deluxe is an excelent mobo.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, as a single developer I don't work with a RAID-System; I backup my projects daily on an external hard disk. So far, so good. Aditionally a question, which I already asked John: what do you think about working on a 64-bit OS? Does VS 2005 also work on a 64-bit base (output 32 bit, of course), or does it run with 32-bit, no matter what the OS is able to?
Wolfgang
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't tried 64bit editions yet so I don't know.
Sql Server 2005 64 bit overview:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/64bit/overview.mspx
|
|
|
|
|
OK, many thanks so far.
Wolfgang
|
|
|
|
|
sohst wrote: OK, as a single developer I don't work with a RAID-System
I'm the same way - every motherboard I've purchased in the last 7 years supports RAID in some form or another, but I don't use it. What I find truly strange is that RAID drivers are almost always provided on floppy disks instead of being included on the motherboard's CD-ROM. I haven't had a floppy drive in my systems for a number of years... 
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if my hard disk conks out, I simply have to buy a new one and restore all project data from my backup hard disk. I think, a RAID system only has to guarantee an absoluteley uninterrupted service - normally required at web/file servers. But this doesn't supersede or even matches my backup necessities. So, I personally never used a RAID system and actually never missed it, too. ... Hope, I'm not on the wrong track! 
|
|
|
|
|
kallileo wrote: I think a cheap 965 mobo
When you buy "cheapo" parts, you get questionable reliability.
kallileo wrote: also you don't need expensive GPU
I wasn't recommending a killer video card - I was recommending that if he intends to move to Vista, he should get a DX-10 capable card. I have a 8800gtx, but that's still above $500. nVidia recently announced much less capable (yet DX-10-comaptible) cards. They're supposed to be significantly cheaper but I haven't checked them out yet.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I have change 3 mobos in the last 6 months. I had a gigabyte ds4, a dfi 975X/G and now a DFI RD600.
What I say is that since you're not an overclocker or a gamer either u buy a gigabyte ds3(120$) or an Asus Commando(220$) it's the same.
Nvidia 8500GT(dx10) cost about 140$ and 8600GTS around 200$.
Now about RAID.
Raid Drivers are always in floppy disk but I use nlite to intergrate them into the Windows XP cd. So I don't need floppy disk for raid then I install Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Can any one tell how to configure a Switch for
1.LAN connection without Internet connection.
2.LAN connection with Internet connection.
Thank u
Chandu
|
|
|
|
|
Normal home/small office switches don't have any configuration, just plug in all the cables and it works.
|
|
|
|
|
You have to follow these instructions precisely:
1) Get a 35-foot CAT-5e cable rated for outside use, and make 7 coils between 7 and 8 inches in diameter, twisting the wire three times before it completes a coil. Lay the coiled wire on the desk and place something heavy on it to keep the coils from uncoiling.
2) Get four standard 7-inch metal butter knives, and tape them together so that when laid flat on the desk, the handles alternate between pointing up and down. Some people claim that if the handle is down on the left side, you get a better signal, but nobody's been able to prove it to my satisfaction.
3) Use 2-inch wide aluminum tape to connect the knifes together at both ends (be careful not to let the tape at one end touch the tape at the other end.
4) Solder a six-inch piece of 16-gauge wire on the handles of both the outermost knives.
5) Wrap the knife assembly in electrical tape so that the only thing exposed is the two pieces of wire.
6) Take the knife assembly and carefully tape the wire as tightly as possible to the coiled cat-5 cable. The tape will also server to keep the cat-5 coiled up.
7) Take one end of the cat5 and plug it into your switch. Plug the other end into your computer.
8) Your your internet connection. If you get a net connection that you don't want, unplug the cat5 from your computer and plug it into another available port on your switch. (that's why they call a switch a "switch").
If you're still having problems, google is your friend.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
sounds like how mcgyver would create a coil gun
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot to mention the tinfoil hat requirement during periods of heavy sunspot activity. And here I thought you were an expert...
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 1000GB SATA II (HDS721010KLA330)
for 316,32 Euro! That’s insane!
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
So what? Next month it'll be even less...
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP
Visual Developer - Visual Basic
2006, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
I need to connect my coputers to the switch, and am confused about the cable end structure:
Shall i use both end straigh cable, or both end crossover cable, or one end cross(switch) and the other straight(computer).
Please tell and emphasise.
Best Regards.
Scorpion.
|
|
|
|
|
strait
crossover cables are only used to connect two PCs directly to each other.
--
CleaKO The sad part about this instance is that none of the users ever said anything [about the problem].
Pete O`Hanlon Doesn't that just tell you everything you need to know about users?
|
|
|
|
|
Straight. Just a plain cable that matches your network (e.g. CAT-5e).
And there is only ONE type of crossover cable. crossing over twice would lead you back to a normal cable, just with more interference.
In addition to the other answer:
You might also use a crossover cable to connect two switches if neither of them has an uplink port.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Ceterum censeo, borlandem esse delendam.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot guys, i really appriciate.
Scorpion. "Patience is virtue"
|
|
|
|
|
Straight cable can be problematic because you only have so much room behind your computer. This means the cable can only be so long. I would get curvy cable.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
No, straight cables are the way to go. The bits cannot take the high-speed curving and get all dizzy and confused.
... haha 
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Ceterum censeo, borlandem esse delendam.
|
|
|
|
|
With the correct bit throttling diode, that's not a problem. The bits with then recognize and slow down for turns so they don't jump from wire-to-wire (this is the primary cause of bandwidth collisions). 
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
