|
Except that in the streaming world a hit show brings in a bunch of new subscribers for the first season. A few more for the second, and very little new revenue after that. After the show ends only a small percentage will drop the service. So spending a bunch of money on a show after the third season provides very little uptick for the service. This is a much different business model from mainstream TV.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
A great deal of people cancel their subscriptions after they have watched/binge-watched a particular series . That is why a lot of streaming services are not releasing the entire season at one time. one per week, keeping your subscription longer than 3 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: common sense will dictate that if you speed up the story line, then there would be fewer seasons.
Agree. It's a trade off between number of seasons and keeping it interesting/glued.
For me, little more breadcrums would really help. (Also a quick recap of all seasons in an hour )
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: That's because it's close to the original books - and most novels are abridged heavily to make it to the screen to "keep the action going"
Yeah, got that.
OriginalGriff wrote: The Expanse wasn't (except for the last season which lost a lot of material) - if anything it added stuff to "deepen" the characters in ways that wouldn't work in the books.
For example, 'the dogs made the dead boy body living', some more story cover there would have helped for the season. A little more on 'Entities'.
Protomolecules are past but whats the next big future?
|
|
|
|
|
HAy! No spoilers given here - some people haven't read the books yet!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I really hope they choose to eventually finish it out with 2-3 more seasons. As it stands, I have no idea why they decided to spend valuable time and money on the kids' storyline that never tied into the main story, never resolved, and was purely a setup for what would be the events of season 7. They gave at least an entire episode's worth of screen-time to that story in an already time-starved season, causing other events to get cut short and really lose their impact in my opinion. Still a good season but they made some odd decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: I have no idea why they decided to spend valuable time and money on the kids' storyline
Possibly for a 3 hr feature-length movie?
|
|
|
|
|
That would be cool if they decided to do that. I'd definitely watch.
|
|
|
|
|
There is the "Ender problem": Damn good book, truncated into meaningless pap as a movie ...
Generally, a movie is a short story, not a novel.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Generally, a movie is a short story, not a novel.
Shawshank Redemption is a perfect example of this.
But the streaming service where each book can recieve 6-10 hours of screen time is perfect for most novels. I am surprised that more one-off sci fi books are not being brought to the screen this way.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to watch the last episode tonight.
BTW, I read that one should watch the "extras", especially for the last episode, not that they add to the storyline but I've noticed they do add additional interesting mainly background story stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I'm slowly getting over it.
I'll slowly get my coat and let myself out.
|
|
|
|
|
It has it's ups and downs
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knight Rider is so bad it's good. mullets. shoulder pads. terrible dialogue. hasslehoff's character "Michael"'s most significant acting in the pilot was the part where he got shot in the face.
It's so awful I'm laughing. They go on and on about their fancy "microprocessors" and "silicon valley" and I'm over in 2022 just like ... wow. just.. wow.
And the car.. the car talks. and drives itself. and it's a trans am. and I'm thinking "google would never go for that"
It's absolutely ludicrous.
I remember seeing a couple of episodes when I was a kid, but it wasn't this funny.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
When I was 18 I wanted a car with that Cylon-like roving red light on the front grill.
|
|
|
|
|
And now.. you have one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I always assumed that the Cylon "roving eye" was why they could never shoot straight ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
70's television might even be worse. I think you'd enjoy The Glass Teat and The Other Glass Teat. Sci-fi author and gadfly Harlan Ellison was also a TV critic during that time, and they're collections of his columns. Some of them are hilariously irreverent.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember getting into arguments with my brother when the show first aired, over whether KITT was real or not. He wanted KITT to be so damn real. I was in the 4th grade when that show came out.
|
|
|
|
|
Got something better on TV right now: A Bell 222[^] playing the part of a secret attack helicopter.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|