|
A diabolical act! Heap sort goes badly wrong! (11)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Your clues are utter pandemonium this week
|
|
|
|
|
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A disaster at the singularity...
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I've got another one for tomorrow, if that's what you are asking ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yay! You are up tomorrow.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
POH obviously doesn't want to set them
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had Chrome open with 12 tabs. Open up Task Manager and take a peek and there are SEVENTY NINE chrome.exe processes!
W T ?!
Oh, and before you say "extensions!", I only use one. WebEx, and I didn't even use it today.
|
|
|
|
|
12 Tabs, 1 Frame and 66 data slurpers?
Firefox right now... one tab, 6 processes.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox. 23 tabs, 12 processes.
|
|
|
|
|
9 tabs, 25 processes.
12 extensions loaded, and I believe each of those gets a process even if they aren't being used at the moment.
Most of the processes are sitting there with 0% CPU, Disk, and network; and memory below 30MB, so I don;t worry about 'em.
It makes sense to put each extension is it's own process: if it crashes it doesn't take the rest down with it.
[edit]
It's changed: 7 tabs, 13 processes. Maybe each extension doesn't get a process ...
[/edit]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 30-Jun-20 1:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
Vivaldi: 10 tabs, 17 foreground processes, 5 background + 1 update notifier: total about 1.2GB.
|
|
|
|
|
The worst is when Chrome starts it's software reporter process
|
|
|
|
|
Jacquers wrote: The worst is when Chrome starts it's software reporter process
OMG...don't get me started. What does it do, exactly?
And people worry about Microsoft's telemetry. At least that is rather thoroughly documented.
[edit]
I don't want to see articles on how to disable it. I want to know what it is their reporting tool does. And it needs to be from Google, not some individual who tried to reverse-engineer it.
|
|
|
|
|
3 tabs, 4 extensions, 11 processes... only one of them with high resources (relatively)...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it is using some of those processes to send data back to those Google servers which are waiting to gulp this data. And track every keystroke move of yours.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's fair to say that that much can be taken for granted...?
|
|
|
|
|
It's the bane of cross platform development. Processes are reasonably consistent from Windows to MacOS to Linux. Threads, on the other hand, are a nightmare to develop cross platform. Take a look at the "single threaded" Excel application and you can see up to 25 threads for a single workbook open.
The real question is how many of those processes are in a sleep state of some sort, thereby taking just swap space and no processor.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting notifications at stupid times: the "It's out for delivery today" email arrives six hours after the goods reached my door; "order confirmation" turns up 8 hours after the dispatch note; that kind of thing.
And this has been happening for weeks.
OK, I know why - with the lockdowns, their workload has gone massively high, they are overstretched.
But ... they own AWS, "the world's most comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform" and I thought the great idea with serverless cloud products was expansion: you need more processing, more bandwidth, more anything you just pour some more in. So presumably their systems run on AWS, which doesn't look good for it, really ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Time to specify "Stretch Goals" for their employees and partners ... and also their servers.
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon is having serious issues, and I'm not quite sure where the disconnect is. It might be in the final delivery, not sure.
The other day I ordered a replacement laptop charger. The first thing I noticed, even if it did say "shipped by amazon" was the two day prime looked like 4 day prime. Okay, whatever, CV19 likely. Email confirming the order arrived. 5 days later, still nothing. After a full week, I get an email apologizing that they could not deliver. Hmmm...
So, I went to the page listing reasons why they could not deliver. Every single one of them is the customer's fault. Now, mind you, in the week I've been waiting on the charger, my wife has received probably a dozen deliveries from Amazon, so, no, I don't think it's my issue. And Amazon makes it impossible to gripe at them with their Indian call centers (no offense to the Indians...).
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: So presumably their systems run on AWS, which doesn't look good for it, really ...
Maybe they should get some of their services running on Azure. Y'know, for those times their own system can't cope.
|
|
|
|