|
I did a fairly extensive evaluation of cross platform frameworks last fall. Xamarin looked great at first. The more I looked into it, the less impressed I became. The first shock was the price (they charge $1000 a year per developer per platform.) What you get for that price falls short. I wasn't impressed with the support nor the maturity of Xamarin itself--there's too much "lead you up to the edge of the cliff and then leave."
A lot has changed in the last nine months, so your mileage may vary.
(FYI, I chose to go with Qt. I found it more mature and it gave us the performance we needed. Unfortunately, that project has since been cancelled, so it was all for naught.)
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Does it justify its price?
And what about performance?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't ask me!
Performance is part of the justification of the price!
|
|
|
|
|
Performance as in "The application is lightning fast" or as in "The developper is lightning fast" ?
|
|
|
|
|
That depends on what matters to you.......choose your own metrics!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Static linking to .NET makes for big footprints. No-one likes bloat.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Go for Qt. The offer the same capabilities, only that it's in ol' fashioned C++ and you can use it for free as long as you publish the product under the GPL.
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|
|
I looked into it and read a lot about it last fall...
You still need to know how the platforms works, you still need to know how to make the different userinterfaces for android and IOS, and you need a mac in order to develop and debug IOS apps.
I read about a lot of problems with debugging IOS apps, from the Xamarin IDE.
I went with ADK (Eclipse) and Xcode and have never looked back. Objective-C kan be a bitch to learn, but once you get the hang of it, it's an okay language. Java is quite easy when you are used to C#.
- Anders
|
|
|
|
|
Writhing time[^]
Well done France (did not see that coming) and Honduras.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Allez les bleus, Allez les bleus !!!!
For you non francophile, to have a "bleu" is to have a bruising)
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
For you non francophile, to be a "bleu" is to be a novice
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good grief, it's dirtier than my car!
Just.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, also it probably has more miles on it too
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome, needs a bath!
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
Meh. My truck is dirtier. Just the way it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
.
Mars is solely inhabited by robots.
|
|
|
|
|
A truth that had previously eluded me. Kudos for spotting it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Another early morning and another great episode.
Mirror, Mirror[^]
There have also been some books about the alternate universe which presented a more interesting Star Trek.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, those were the great days of Trek. The emphasis was on the human drama, not the special effects.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. Plus, because you were drawn into that human drama you often miss the frailty of the sets and the lack of those special effects. Great stuff that still stands up well today.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: The emphasis was on the human drama, not the special effects.
I suppose it's too late to remind JJ Abrams of this.
He can keep his nonsense summer blockbuster franchise to himself, as far as I'm concerned, even though it's making more money than all previous ST movies combined.
|
|
|
|
|
A week ago or less there was a link on here about a doctor's diagnosis of Bruce Willis's character in Die Hard. They should do one on a new Star Trek movie. I've only seen the first, and I remember being put off by the continual over-the-top dynamics. (Now to upvote Mark's comment - I agree wholeheartedly!)
|
|
|
|
|
You should watch the trailer for the second movie[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|