|
Still got a nice stack of those, from different companies. Why do we get business cards again?
Wasting trees.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Decades ago I worked for a company that insisted everybody have cards, including us devs who never interacted with anyone outside the company. Or at least not in a capacity in which we'd be representing the company.
Out of the box of 500 I got, I think I still have 498 of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone at my last job was the other side of that farce.
We hired him when he left the Navy at some lowly technicians job title because he was enlisted and only had an associates degree (working on a BS but not done yet); despite the fact that as an SME he was doing technical work well above that level. But he was one of our two on-base personnel for the project and as such was present at industry days and other events where he was meeting with lots of potential customers/suppliers so he was also doing mid-level engineer/entry level management work in that case as well; which meant that he really did need to have business cards of his own. However someone senior in HR was being stubbornly inflexible about people at that junior level never being supposed to have business cards.
His line manager/our program manager went through 3 or 4 cycles of filling out the justification outside of normal process paperwork only to have a warm body at the next level send it back with an automatic denial being reported at the weekly team meetings. The final round of the farce had him saying he was going to be meeting with the head of HR to ask if she would accept that a policy override was needed and approve the business card request, or if he needed to ram an out of cycle promotion through the system instead wasting a ton more of everyone's time and costing far more than the few boxes of cards/year would run. We never heard anything more of it, so I assume the head was either capable of seeing reason or lazy enough to not want to deal with the other half of his threat.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
It's not that I don't like them, it's just that they parked their car in the spot where I had my accident.
|
|
|
|
|
Accidentally
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I had a friend who used to chat up girls in clubs and give them one of 'those' business cards as his own.
This was especially important if he got lucky.
Nothing succeeds like a budgie without teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I buy one with Calamari Flan?
|
|
|
|
|
My favorite is when people screenshot NFT posts, mint that, then sell it as transformative art Richard Prince 2.0.
|
|
|
|
|
Like taking a screenshot of any picture.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
"Fair Use" says that you can use just about anything as long as you don't make money off of it (that would otherwise go to the "creator").
I like copying others' "abstract" paintings. (Not good at hands, feet, faces, etc.)
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is just because I don't have them as part of an asp.net project - I'm actually not using ASP.NET at all, just something with the same syntax.
Anyway, even when I name the template files .aspx only the "client side" code gets syntax highlighted, which isn't helpful to me really.
I want the "server side" code (which is C#) to be highlighted and intellisensed. That would be golden. Trouble is, no matter what ASP.NET @ directives I put at the top of my page I cannot get visual studio to highlight my "server side" code (again C#)
I haven't actually written an ASP.NET site in years. I do have the VS components for it installed, but I seem to remember it highlighting server side code in those projects.
Anyone have any ideas? I can't really "stage" this as an ASP.NET project because of the way the templates are used, and I need access to stdin, stdout and stderr plus command line arguments.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
This is a programming question best posted in the ASP.NET forum:
ASP.NET Discussion Boards[^]
It's rumoured ASP.NET experts dwell there to avoid things like explosive decompression and other things of this nature.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a visual studio question. It has nothing to with ASP.NET. It would be like me going to the C++ forums to ask why VS Code wasn't working. I'm not even using the ASP.NET engine.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: This is a visual studio question. It has nothing to with ASP.NET. Rephrase your question without either words. It is part of the subject.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
It's why it was in quotes. It's visual studios highlighting of ASP.NET pages. Not the ASP.NET engine which isn't run. I explained that in the question. I did not explain that in the title because that's not what titles are for.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
In quotes.
Yah. Never argue.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not going to try to help you understand something you refuse to understand. It seems a waste of my time, and I'm busy.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I'm not going to try to help you understand something you refuse to understand Implies I'd need that help, kid.
honey the codewitch wrote: It seems a waste of my time, and I'm busy. Are you, my dear? So sorry to bother you.
Which tone bothers you more?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I have some time now.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Implies I'd need that help, kid.
You clearly do, because if anything you still haven't figured out the difference between Visual Studio, and ASP.NET, despite them being very different products. Problems with one are not the same with problems with the other, in case you weren't aware, because that's not how any of this works. And speaking of problems, your inability to distinguish between two major Microsoft offerings is your problem. You've decided to make it mine. Don't.
I don't care about tone. I care about facts.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: You clearly do, because if anything you still haven't figured out the difference between Visual Studio, and ASP.NET I do WinForms, not some silly websites
honey the codewitch wrote: And speaking of problems, your inability to distinguish between two major Microsoft offerings is your problem. Must have been quite a post that you're referring to.
honey the codewitch wrote: I don't care about tone. I care about facts. Let me pick some more cherries for ya
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: I do WinForms, not some silly websites
I don't do websites either. That doesn't excuse your ignorance regarding where Visual Studio ends and ASP.NET begins.
And if you were a bit wiser you'd hold off arguing about subjects which you don't know about (by your own admission)
The post I was referring to is the OP. The words there are simple. You should have no problem understanding it if you could actually be bothered to read it rather than simply looking to pick a fight with me.
You're wasting my time. I'm done with you.
Now find a hobby that doesn't involve me. Bye.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Qoiet - saw BONES[^]
I was listening to some death metal and metalcore last week when Spotify put this one on shuffle.
At first it seemed totally normal to have this track in that particular playlist, but then things got a little different...
It sounds like death metal mixed with dubstep, but listening to some more of his tracks it turns out it's more like dubstep blended with death metal.
According to his biography "Qoiet (real name Bruno Brocker) is a producer whose incredibly unique style is as frenetic and ferocious as it is brutal and bombastic."
That sums it up nicely.
Not unlike anything I've heard before, but it's very nicely done and Qoiet takes things a bit further than most other bands and producers.
The biography also coins the term "metalstep".
In any case, sound of the week!
|
|
|
|
|
A whole new world that is a lot less angry: 【洗礼】名古屋で
|
|
|
|
|