|
It could have been a desert pizza, but these ingedients are often put together.
I do a 'mille feuille' of goats cheese, pistacios, honey and bric (a north african pastry like filo) as a salad starter, similar ingredients, and a combination much used around the med: goats cheese and mint parcels - Google Search[^]
|
|
|
|
|
...know people who release code without checking it at all?
(And do not tell you do it yourself!!!)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
"I do not have to forgive my enemies, I have had them all shot." — Ramón Maria Narváez
This applies equally to those that check-in untested code, much less release it!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Shooting him is an act of mercy... I was in the line of skinning, boiling in oil... You know, the whole pack from the middle ages...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: I was in the line of skinning, boiling in oil...
...then gibbeting on a lamppost outside the office, as a warning to others.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I must confess I've checked in non-compiling code once or twice...
And a couple of times that my checked in code didn't compile, but only because for some reason half of my code didn't get committed (like project A committed just fine, but project B didn't).
And I've had a few coworkers who did that at least once a week which is very annoying.
Or do you mean "release" as in a release to a customer? Because I can't imagine people not checking that
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Because I can't imagine people not checking that
You have to work on your imagination...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, perhaps I can imagine it.
It was more like wishful thinking
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: do you mean "release" as in a release to a customer? Because I can't imagine people not checking that
But you use Microsoft products!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
At one company we had automatic build that, originally, ran on all the dev environments each night. In our team we had a rule that if a build failed due to an untested checkin you bought treats - dog-nuts, cakes, etc - for those affected. One of my minions made a 'tiny tweak' to the build process itself. Next morning he came in to be confronted by 30+ failed builds...
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Oops!
Was his face red after that?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yup and his wallet was emptied
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Our penalty was a round of beers on friday night. It had been known that 2am was not an unreasonable time to get home after a bad week. With 6 dev, 2 QC and a PM it was a bloody expensive round.
It had been known to log on to a colleagues machine and insert a divide by zero if it looked like being a dry week.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Dog-nuts?! Nasty! I thought the punishment was for the one who didn't test, not the other team members?
|
|
|
|
|
One arrogant prick I worked with did this. Checked in and got straight on Facebook. What a foster!
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who does this better have a real fast car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surely, there's a MS joke in here somewhere.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I refuse to answer on the grounds I may incriminate myself.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, honestly.. such people exist on the earth...
___@sHubHa
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: ...know people who release code without checking it at all?
There are times where I have had to do this because the checked in code is part of the build process.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much all the time. It's the joys of PHP on a low volume website.
If I break something, I've pretty much got 30 mins before anyone notices.
For other languages, it the usual 'it works for me' scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
Release code me? NEVER! I have had team members who do this all the time. There Sh!t don't stink ya know. Never admits fault etc....
Check in code that doesn't compile. This I do alllllll the time. I leave a compile error where I was last working all the time. This helps me pick up where I left off in the code. Check in and commit code for even a dev rollout though. Nope don't do that.
But then again perhaps I work differently than others. (who knew )))
To err is human to really mess up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: know people who release code without checking it at all?
To stinking many of them. Not only not checking it, but leaving it broken for the weekend.
I've had people do that when just checking in code to the repo, and that's bad enough, but I've also seen people releasing code to production without checking, and then not responding to phone calls all weekend.
Bloody torture time.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm only 1 and I don't. How many people answer "How many of you..." questions without providing a quantity?
|
|
|
|