|
Hi,
I'm using this Json_spirit library with boost 1_46_0, wxWidgets3.0 in Visual Studio 2008.
After linking and compiling the project I'm getting error like
"
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "bool __cdecl json_spirit::read(class std::basic_istream<char,struct std::char_traits<char=""> > &,class json_spirit::Value_impl<struct json_spirit::config_vector<class="" std::basic_string<char,struct="" std::char_traits<char="">,class std::allocator<char> > > > &)" (?J_read@json_spirit@@YA_NAEAV?$basic_istream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@AEAV?$Value_impl@U?$Config_vector@V?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@@json_spirit@@@1@@Z) referenced in function "private: class wxWindow * __cdecl HiFrame::ReadingJson(class wxWindow *,class wxString &,class wxString &)" (?ReadingJson@HiFrame@@AEAAPEAVwxWindow@@PEAV2@AEAVwxString@@1@Z) "
can anybody help me out to resolve this problem.??
thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong forum!
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
Not on this forum old chap, please try the correct one or be prepared for heaps of abuse
if you post on the correct forum there will be all number of people willing to help
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
No.
If you can't be bothered to read, why would I be bothered to help you?
There is text at the top of this page that tells you what this forum is for, and what you should do to ask a programming question. And if you can't even be bothered to read that why should I believe that you have bothered to:
1) Try to fix it yourself?
Or
2) Try to google and see if the problem has been solved already?
So what - exactly - is the reason I should help you, if you can't be bothered to try and help yourself?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I think they do it on purpose, most times 
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's just laziness: "I've found a site, this is busy, they'll do it for me nice and quick and I don't have to think".
Same attitude in QA these days... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Same attitude in QA these days...
New generation of coderZ
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
There are over 92k of results for this error, so obviously he either didn't bother to look or more likely does not understand what they are saying, basically that he is copy and pasting code without the basic understanding of what it does and how it does it.
So if you were to answer the question the answer would be - LEARN TO THE BASICS OF CODING BEFORE TRYING THE MORE COMPLEX
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: LEARN TO THE BASICS OF CODING BEFORE TRYING THE MORE COMPLEX RTFM
FTFY
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I am yet to be convinced they have reached the stage that they can actually understand the manual
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
The FM isn't always right, even if there is one. OK, maybe not a manual, but this week I quickly glanced through a book on "Building enterprise applications with windows presentation foundation", and all I found were what read like a high school child gushing about his latest crush[1], and a horribly weak attempt at domain modelling.
[1] E.g: "In my opinion, the most dangerous thing you can do in a database is create stored procedures (SPs) ."
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: LEARN TO THE BASICS OF CODING BEFORE TRYING THE MORE COMPLEX
Or grab hoe and shovel, there's always need of it!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
Don't "SAK", don't "stackoverflow", just redirect them to Q&A. Given the ratio "questions asked on the site" to "questions erroneously asked in the Lounge", we can make a little effort and not bash the lost souls when they happen to post here.
Or, with the very same reason, send them to burn in hell.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't think that a complete lack of effort on his behalf deserves some flak? my guess is that it probably is already in the Q&A and probably Stackoverflow too.
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Don't "SAK", don't "stackoverflow",
I'm not: he ignores clear directions as to what he does need to do. If he had posted it at QA, then he'd get a response, but there is clear, bright red, text at the top of this page, and he didn't bother to even read it, much less to try and help himself.
And I'm in a bad mood. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You've read the text in small chars in my post, haven't you ?
|
|
|
|
|
Nah: I just copy'n'pasted it into a question site and shoved the result up here, same as normal! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
someone pointed out that postings like this in the lounge is like accosting the desktop support guy in the toilet about your pc problems
Right person but due to the location you may not get the answer you were hoping for
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
You have found the correct site, but the wrong forum : Try to ask your question here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
You could try turning your computer off and on and see if it's solved! Good luck!
Wout
|
|
|
|
|
You could try turning your computer off and on and see if it's solved! Good luck!
FIFY
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11258353 wrote: can anybody help me out to resolve this problem.??
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
0. Windows containing grids that contain combos that scroll with the mousewheel when you meant to scroll the grid!
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
1. Windows containing data in grids that cannot be resized, even thought the grid is self-evidently too small for the window size.
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
2. Windows that, on change of a combobox value, perform time-consuming changes without confirmation
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
* excluding constipation
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd and the 3rd one, I agree.
But for the 1st one, I suspect you still had the combo focused when you scrolled. One must always click someplace else inside the grid in order to get the focus off the combo. 
And that's a feature!
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
I miss-spoke (or, more accurately, miss-moaned). It's not a combo in the grid - it is the combo that is the initial focus on the form, that changes on mousewheel, and automatically updates the contents of the grid - which can take a minute or more with our configuration - so really it's 0 and 2 combined - but lists of three are so much more, I dunno, neat?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
