|
http://www.w3schools.com/jquery/jquery_intro.asp[^]
Quote:
Will jQuery work in all browsers?
The jQuery team knows all about cross-browser issues, and they have written this knowledge into the jQuery library. jQuery will run exactly the same in all major browsers, including Internet Explorer 6!
Wow that is a statement. Next time they write we 100% error free.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Also
Bruno Sprecher wrote: all major browsers
Bruno Sprecher wrote: Internet Explorer 6
Microsoft IE Team will be so proud! 
|
|
|
|
|
I did not wrote that, it is from the Quote I read 
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Just kidding you man! 
|
|
|
|
|
Except that jQuery dropped support for older browsers in V2. In fact, jQuery 1 wouldn't run in IE before IE 6. Source[^]
So, while the team may know all about cross-browser issues, it doesn't mean they've fixed them all.
|
|
|
|
|
Good, I see marketing lesson 1 is assimilated. Let's switch to lesson 2 then.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Except that jQuery dropped support for older browsers in V2.
... which is why they're still maintaining full feature parity 1.x. Splitting the code base into modern and legacy versions lets web sites that don't need to support legacy browsers serve a significantly (12%) smaller version of jquery. Sites that are doing it wrong and doing server side browser version string sniffing can send 2.x to most users and still feed 1.x to legacy IE.
My peanut gallery observation is that they should've stripped support from the android 2.3 browser from their 2.x build. When they first forked it, they said that Android 2.x browser was the worst remaining source of hacks in the code; and it seems likely to fade from the market much sooner than IE8 will Statcounter and Netmarketshare give very different estimates for how much IE8 is used; but neither of them is showing much movement in its share over the last year; while Android 2.x's share has plummeted from ~22% a year ago to 8% now.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Sites that are doing it wrong and doing server side browser version string sniffing can send 2.x to most users and still feed 1.x to legacy IE.
Why is this "doing it wrong"?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
<Insert any of the dozens of rantblogs about the evils of version string sniffing vs checking for capabilities and how doing so screws up modern versions of IE by forcefeeding them WTFeries designed for IE6/etc instead from the last 5 years of insider news here.>
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Oh that. Right.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
To justify backup...[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You know what?
I think I did it too!
|
|
|
|
|
I've been lucky enough never to do this in a production environment, but I am well aware that but for the grace of God (and backups...) - we all go there.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
/puts hand up and bows head
It's that icy feeling in the pit of one's stomach...
Thank Bob for Backups.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message removed
modified 13-Feb-15 0:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
You missed a couple. ![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
What if every country had ninjas, but we only know about the Japanese ones because they're rubbish?
|
|
|
|
|
Japan actually has none; the French made that up to draw attention away from their own.
|
|
|
|
|
Justb imagine it, 1000s of highly trained men, skilled in the art of stealth retreat and singing La Marseilles.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds terrifying. 1000 Cacofonixs making the heaven cry and rain forever? By the way the french name for this person is way better: Assurancetourix. Assurance = insurance, tourix (tout risque) = all risks.
For those who don't understand a word: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Asterix_characters[^]
I won’t not use no double negatives.
|
|
|
|
|
I was gonna say; take this to the soapbox, but then you ambushed me with some backstabbing ninja talk. 
|
|
|
|
|
 Just absolutely brilliant
|
|
|
|
|
The rest of the world does have them.
We just don't call them "ninjas", because it's a really stupid word.
ninja
ninnn-ja!
nin-nin-nin-ja-ja-ja!
Yeah, really gives the impression of a scary ghostly silent assassin.
(In a Looney Tunes cartoon, maybe.)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I call our network guy ninja as I never see him come or go.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporal Agarn wrote: I call our network guy ninja as I never see him data come or go.
Sounds more realistic.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
