|
I hope self driving cars are smarter than that and avoid the collision altogether, anyway, the only fair way to decide this is with a coin, if it's heads the owner survives, it it's tails, he/she doesn't...
Seriously, if not even a human is able to make such decision, I don't see why a robot should do it.
After ruminating this a bit, I came to realize that the issue as stated is pretty binary, but what it's really interesting is what if we add more variable that just life/death, perhaps, if we add disability or quality of life, an example would be that the robot is able to tell that by doing X maneuver will save the 4 little girls standing on the street and kill the driver, but that doing so will left them disabled (for example, one will have it's leg broken, the other will be hit and send against a wall with a protuberance at the level of the lower spine, etc.), while if it kills the 4 little girls, the driver will survive largely unscratched, should the robot be able to make such decision?, what would be to correct one?
|
|
|
|
|
It is a pity to install. Really. After trying more than 4 different "Download Managers" and "SDK Images" (all available from the Samsung Download page) I eventually got something that seems to do what it shall do - Install the damn SDK.
How hard is it to write a decent installer for an SDK? I mean even Microsoft managed to get their VS installer to run smooth.
Edit: Managed to install it. Hope the missing Intel Virtualization won't be an issue. And I'm not even surprised that they please me with yet another Eclipse variant...
As it is already 00:30 around here I'm going to sleep now.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
modified 13-May-14 18:30pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch. That doesn't bode well for Samsung
|
|
|
|
|
Installed it, see my update.
You might want to tell them that they *really* need to improve the error messages in their so called "Download Manager".
Website "http://" not found doesn't go well with developers using the software
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen that from a number of download managers. Usually the program had failed at reading the URL from some source, and went with the default.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only programmer that gets upset when clueless coworkers invade personal space? Surely I can't be the only one right?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! You have personal space?
I'm impressed!
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have to go with Walt on this, I'm jealous.
Try NOT responding when 2 creatures from another team start screeching at each other in Chinese directly behind your chair.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Try NOT responding when 2 creatures from another team start screeching at each other in Chinese directly behind your chair.
You got me beat man. That would drive me up a wall.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Distance doesn't matter; on a conference call today two or even three of my cow-orkers were chewing gum -- right into their elephanting microphones. I had to take my headset off.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok so chewing gum is not an issue here in Singapore however they have no issues with sniffing here and they refuse to use a handkerchief/tissue so getting that on a conference call can really curl your toes.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I bet.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
No, you're not. And frankly, the more I work at home, alone, the more I can't stand working near other people. No, let me correct that. The more I can't stand working with people.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: The more I can't stand working with people.
That's just it though. I love people. It's just some people in IT or the "office life" have like zero freaking clue. You say "piss off" and they think "nah, let's stalk this guy and get in his space." Cuz ya know, that's how friend are made.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Cuz ya know, that's how friend are made.
I could have fun with that.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I could have fun with that.
And that's why we're friends Marc.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you are the only one.
The rest of us just punch the first time, and find our personal space is rarely, if ever, invaded subsequently.
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: punch the first time
I'm taking notes...
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
This may explain it:[^]
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Amen brother!
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I presume there won't be any answers under 110 in a place for coders !
Also, I want to know if Im clever enough to do something really important at computers!( e.g working at intel,finding zero day exploits etc )..of course I know fluid intelligence is not the only factor...but it surely plays a major role!
So...my Intelligence Quotient is from 128 to 145(different tests,different results...most accurate was at~130 I think)
Is that good enough for what I want?
And what's yours?
Random fact: guitars with floyd rose tremolo system (floating tremolo)have less sustain than those with a fixed bridge since there is much energy lost on the bridge..sustain also varies by the wood used,distance between string and fretboard and material used at the end of the strings...who knows...maybe a stranger will call you and say "if you tell me a disadvantage of floating tremolo system i will give you 1.000.000€
|
|
|
|
|
EbolaHost wrote: Is that good enough for what I want?
If you have to ask...
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Well...is that a yes or a no?
Im 17 with no experience and half-asleep so I cant figure it out myself
|
|
|
|
|
This is what they won't tell you in academia land... measuring IQ is extremely subjective. And there are many types of intelligence that IQ simply does not measure. It's basically a number for geeks to geek out on much like how guys compare bench press.
Anyway, I have a genius level IQ that's like almost 200 (or did), but years of stress made that drop like a rock. And believe me I sure can be stupid at times. I'm sure I could climb it back up if I really wanted to. So could you. It only measures analytic intelligence where the prerequisite is some formal knowledge in XYZ despite the claims otherwise. The more you program the better your brain will learn to analyze and thus your IQ will go up, assuming stress doesn't kill you.
So, learn Zen, smoke pot, be a genius.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|