|
Can you taste it?
So very close!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Yes but not quite sure which one!
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Read the clue again then.
It is all there and it should now be obvious.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
|
YE Gods...
8 and 4!!!!
How obvious is it now?
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I must be very dense; I'll come back to this.
|
|
|
|
|
Correction, I am very dense.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah...some you see immediately, some you don't.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Formerly an artist PRINCE
and was an artist it is said (Badly pronounced) CEZANNE by royal issue.
Princess Anne
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Griff, I knew it had to be her but I just couldn't see the artist.
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
My mother was the arty type, so I got a thorough grounding.
As kids I used to drag her to museums, she dragged me to art galleries...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
You mean you're sorry that I'm incredibly dense?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I'm sorry if I jumped the gun, when you would have got it soon!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Well Done Laddie.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Today i was exploring the visual studio toolbox and just count that there are almost 100 controls are provided by microsoft for web development + they have around 20-30 validation extender if we include ajax control toolkit options. i wondered that i have hardly used 40-50 controls in my projects during my 4 years of programming experience. may be they don't fit in project need or i don't exactly know how to use some particular control. i also remember that on some of controls i tried them just to see how they works and may use in the future but don't actually used them ever i.e. view multi view and adrotater.
now a days we all are moving with Some light weight development and mostly used html controls and jquery/other techniques to reduce the rendering time on the browser even in the asp.net but i really would like to start learning all of the controls which are provided in the tool box when i get some free time.
just wanted to share is it me only or you also feel the same.???
Ravi Khoda
|
|
|
|
|
I never used them for any of my projects and checked a few of them only...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Its not only you..there are may still be lots of people who have not used some of the controls in their years of development experience....
Still share your knowledge when you gain some by trying out some controls..It may still be useful for atleast one person...at some point of time!!!
Regards,
Dinesh Kumar.V.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer custom controls according to my need instead of MS controls. I also try to use HTML controls if possible.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
yes mostly we used HTML controls but sometime it may possible that we build our own user control based on some specific need.. at the same time there is a possibility that ms controls exactly provide the same feature with easy properties and attributes but we don't use them because we don't know how to use it or we just ignore.
if we at least know something about each controls it can be useful when we take a decision to build a user controls. sometimes creating a user control takes long development time and the ms control provide the same feature with less efforts...
just a thought....
Ravi Khoda
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like since console based companies (Like Playstation and XBox) still have not mastered the playing platform to this day. As I myself agree they will always be lacking in the area of getting true committed PC gamers. I mean really, as a gamer who would want to play on a console when you get so much more out of a PC?
Well I believe that gap might now be filled and the remaining of the people will be going for the Steam OS[^] System. Well that would be my opinion.
What would be your take on all this?
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Is Steam OS going to be as much of a PITA as Steam itself? If so, I rather gouge my own eyeballs out...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Well you can google it
or ask a forum[^]
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|