|
He went West, reached one end of the flat earth and fell down.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting read. Haven't heard form him in years now I know why.
Used to like his stuff, but haven't heard anything in a very long time.
|
|
|
|
|
If you ate a clock, would it be time consuming?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You got that thought second hand, didn't you.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
yes, twice a day.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
You have to chew it minute bits if you expect to swallow it.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't get tic'd off, but how are we supposed to swallow that? Surely, if it would cause and up-set stomach when daylight savings time arrive. Let's not face this question.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Not if it was a Clockwork Orange...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you go back for seconds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just installed it and...
Shell and hotkeys became unresponsive after awhile of using it. Couldn't control alt delete. Had to hit the "Oh Elephant!" Button.
Browser pages becoming unresponsive and I'm on a Ryzen 7 32GB RAM @ 700MBits of pipe.
]
So it might be a networking issue. I've had problems with them hosing my drivers already this year, and it has been awhile since i've seen this but in prior windows when you had hangs deep in the network stack the whole system would crawl even if you didn't think you were doing much networking, mostly because of the timeouts on things like background UPNP and SMB pinging
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed that hotkeys are unresponsive unless I first click the taskbar. Seems like it matters what has the focus.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried clicking on the start menu and it wouldn't open. Ctrl Alt Del and Ctrl Alt Esc didn't even work.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked your keyboard connection? Wireless? plug in a wired one to test.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
i checked caps lock and my keyboard is lit anyway. Besides, that wouldn't explain the web pages going unresponsive or the shell not responding to clicks.
It wasn't my (< 6 month old) keyboard.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
It works on my computer (famous last word).
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
I've managed to avoid problems with VS updates - having not installed one for years.
Once upon a time it was a nice tight coding environment. And then it wasn't. And more wasn't.
So, tired of wasn't I went to isn't.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I just have to hit alt-ctrl-del to make the login button appear (instead of it being visible right away after restart by moving the mouse), but apart from that, it works. I have not restarted a second time though.
|
|
|
|
|
The news item posted by Kent today about a new "PriorityQueue" feature in NET 6 [^] triggered an itch i call: "i-could-make-one-of-those."
Since I had never experimented with SortedSet, I decided to use that and see where it took me. And, it took me to an interesting place as i wrestled with how to define a generic wrapper structure ... SortedSet<T> requires a Type with an IComparer implementation.
After muddling around for an hour or so (several mental buffers needed refreshing), i had a working example that i then tested.
And, then i got snagged as i changed a value in a SortedSet element ... a DateTime Property ... and it appeared the Set did not sort as expected.
With growing frustration, I tried different values, and re-tested.
i began to get angry as my cherished image of myself as an expert debugger began to resemble the aging wreck i see in any mirror i am unlucky enough to look into by accident
Finally, it dawned on me: i expected the wrong result ! Yes, the beast was doing what i told it to do.
i think we need a new word for this special kind of bruised-ego chagrin mixed with plummeting self-esteem ... i'll try to think of one, later ... first, I need to go outside and scream some more.
p.s. code on request
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
I heard a song when I read this response: [^]
fwiw: the "seems ugly" part of working with .NET sorted collections is having to remove, then re-insert a changed value, to force an update.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
When dealing with a straight collection class yes, but most dictionaries and lists have indexer properties that allow you to update a value.
I wasn't trying to show anyone up but I guess I see how it could come across that way. I posted it before coffee imbued me with appropriate tact.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
When you want a collection to auto re-sort based on changes to one or more properties of items in the collection ... I have yet to explore the idea INotifyPropertyChanged might be used. Be interested to hear your ideas. I need to go back and explore the various Sorted structures available.
"show anyone up" ? not to worry ... just my own wicked sense of humor
91F feels like 114F, humidity 57%, here, at 10AM ... brain-fog thickening ...
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Sorted collections are supposed to enforce sorted order *always*
So I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish.
If you want a container that's not sorted until you sort it you should consider using an unsorted list and then running sort on it.
Otherwise I don't understand why you'd need it to resort on property changed, unless wait .. are you trying to change the sorting rules?
Depending on the context, you might consider IBindingListView if you want it to be bindable. If you're thinking INotifyPropertyChanged, you're probably better off implementing the above ,or maybe just using BindingList<t> - i think that handles sorts with rules.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Sorted collections are supposed to enforce sorted order *always* Unfortunately .. not ... for Sorted-xxx reference Types where the re-sort "trigger" you want is a change to a Property
Here's what I have to do to force an update:
public void ChangeValue(Project ptochange, DateTime newdate)
{
Projects.Value.Remove(ptochange);
ptochange.DeadLine = newdate;
Projects.Value.Add(ptochange);
} And the Project Class:
public class Project : IComparable
{
public Project(string name, DateTime deadLine)
{
Name = name;
DeadLine = deadLine;
}
public string Name { set; get; }
public DateTime DeadLine { set; get; }
public int CompareTo(object y)
{
if (ReferenceEquals(this, y)) return 0;
if (ReferenceEquals(null, y)) return 1;
return this.DeadLine.CompareTo(((Project)y).DeadLine);
}
} I'll post an example on the C# forum, and, I hope you'll respond there.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|