|
What really amuses me is the periodic calls for environments that will allow anyone, including non-programmers, to write programs or "code." As it is, we have more than enough individuals who pass themselves off as programmers and emit the stuff that Marc is ranting about (justifiably so.) Some people think programming should accessible to everyone. Just imagine the nonsensical detritus we will end up with if that happens. Considering how things are now, I think it is scary to contemplate.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
I don't disagree with the idea of coding being made "accessible" to everyone, because you never know where you'll find someone with the kind of mind that will make a good dev.
It's the idea that making it accessible means that everyone and his uncle Billy will be a great coder that's the problem.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: because you never know where you'll find someone with the kind of mind that will make a good dev.
Very true. I certainly started off as a "bad" dev many many years ago (too many moons to count, years are easier.)
Mark_Wallace wrote: It's the idea that making it accessible means that everyone and his uncle Billy will be a great coder that's the problem.
Worse, it's that these people then get hired and paid and they're surrounded by people that don't know better themselves. And they say that perpetual motion is impossible.
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Worse, it's that these people then get hired and paid and they're surrounded by people that don't know better themselves.
The number of times I've seen brilliant guys overlooked because someone who can do a half-@rsed job is better at selling himself is too painful to even try to calculate.
For the past 20 years, I've been in a position to kick back against such treatment, and you can rest assured that I've kicked bloody hard, whenever possible.
Bullsh1t may baffle brains, but it's good brains that get the work done and create the ROI.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: The number of times I've seen brilliant guys overlooked because someone who can do a half-@rsed job is better at selling himself is too painful to even try to calculate.
On the other hand, speaking humbly from my own experience, being hired to work on projects that were half-@rsed coded by those less-than-brilliant people is a rather torturous experience which in itself is surmountable unless one's manager and the department ASSistant VP were promoted from the ranks of said less-than-brilliant people and are responsible for a considerable amount of the half-@arsed code.
NOT a pretty environment, and I am soooo glad I was able to leave it last December. Which is what, humbly speaking, the brilliant guys (and gals) do when they realize the crock of sh*t environment they landed in. Entirely my fault, I should have vetted them better. 
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I am soooo glad I was able to leave it last December
I remember well sharing the relief you felt, at the time, because it radiated out from your words, as you told of how you'd found a place where you were better appreciated.
And just so you know: Your "Clifton Method" has not only been pretty handy to me, but I've passed it on to guys who have also found it useful, so it's obvious that you're doing something right.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: And just so you know: Your "Clifton Method" has not only been pretty handy to me, but I've passed it on to guys who have also found it useful
Wow, that's great to hear! Thanks! ![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote: Just imagine the nonsensical detritus ...
Or vist QA. 
|
|
|
|
|
You missed the part where even though all JavaScript developers know they're coding gods, the other developers who publish NPM packages are even better, so if there's a package in the NPM repositories it's obviously better than anything you could ever write however trivial it may be, like left-pad[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Add to everything you have mentioned the fact that browsers implement Javascript slightly differently as well as the still in use monstrosity known as Internet Explorer and the need to use a polyfill in order to fix the browser 'quirks'.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
modified 9-Feb-19 5:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the same applies to every programming language. A bad programmer can write (or copy 'n' paste) bad code in any language.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I think the same applies to every programming language.
Very true. 
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, but... The problem with JavaScript is also JavaScript 
Bad coders and a bad language are not mutually exclusive 
|
|
|
|
|
... Oh Elephant![^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wire you posting this? Cheap drills, I suspect.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa!
Are you on Oak Island?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If he was ON Oak Island it would more like "Whoa! there's a minuscule piece of wood! Obviously a sign that the vikings left a vast treasure here! Keep drilling!"
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
God, I love that show!
There's obviously nothing there, but Could it Be That...?
Have you seen the latest?
They found concrete, so it's Obviously the work of the Ancient Romans, who were able to make concrete!
... Erm... because the stuff needed for making conrete was near enough to Rome for them to transport it to Rome -- transporting it to north-north America (where there is no other evidence of the Ancient Romans having gone there), would maybe be another kettle of cookies.
It's the best comedy show on TV, right now. Riveting. And cool machinery.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: It's the best comedy show on TV, right now. Riveting. And cool machinery.
Not going to argue that, it's amazing they can keep a straight face sometimes.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is a cation the most purrfect meowlecule?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I keep an ion your post - and paws to reflect upon them beclaws of the whisker-thin implications to to your stability. Well - at least you don't charge for them.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
That Boron the nonsensical!
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing my tests due to problems with the timestamps on the reports...
I create a test file
HANDLE hFile = CreateFileW(L"D:\\PUBLIC\\myTest.txt", GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, CREATE_NEW, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
I get the file timestamp,
I close the file handle,
I convert it to system timestamp
print the results to compare.
First run: It works fine
Second run (file still there): Error already exists as expected
delete the file
Third run: It works semi fine, it goes through everything, but gives me the wrong timestamps
fourth run (file still there): Error already exists as expected
delete the file (second one)
fifth run: Still the same timestamp
delete the file (third one)
a couple of times more, each time getting deeper in the debugger, always the same 
IDEA...
delete the last file
empty recycle bin
Next run: It works good and gives the correct timestamp
As long as the previously generated files still exists in the bin, I get the timestamp of the first generated file although I am opening the handle and closing it again at each run  
Either I empty the bin after each test or I use a new file name... Not a big problem once found, but... seriously? 
EDIT: I have just tested, getting 3 files deleted, permanently delete #1, #3 and keep #2 in the bin... it works fine again. It is keeping the handle only to the very first file of group where the timestamps are read correctly.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 8-Feb-19 6:52am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
